Re: docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH

2009-12-09 Thread Michael Schutte
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:25:49AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I've been updating python-docutils to version 0.6. This version includes > the separate man page and ODT writers that were previously packaged by Ben > Finney and Michael Schutte, so I've made it conflict/provide/replace them, > and

Re: docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH

2009-12-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Simon McVittie , 2009-12-07, 10:40: Unrelated to 0.6, I've been thinking about handing over python-docutils to someone else - I hardly use it myself, and I'm not really in touch with upstream, so I'd welcome a takeover from anyone who can give it more attention than me. [...] Uploaders: mart

Re: docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH

2009-12-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 16:06:18 +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > The ‘rst2odt’ and ‘rst2man’ packages should stay in some form, I think. > That's the end-user package that people are generally looking for when > they want the writer. > > Perhaps ‘docutils’ 0.6 should ‘Provides: rst2man, rst2odt’ or the

Re: docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH

2009-12-06 Thread Ben Finney
Simon McVittie writes: > I've been updating python-docutils to version 0.6. This version > includes the separate man page and ODT writers that were previously > packaged by Ben Finney and Michael Schutte, so I've made it > conflict/provide/replace them, and put their maintainers in the > Uploader

docutils: 0.6, rst2man/rst2odt obsoleted, RFH

2009-12-06 Thread Simon McVittie
I've been updating python-docutils to version 0.6. This version includes the separate man page and ODT writers that were previously packaged by Ben Finney and Michael Schutte, so I've made it conflict/provide/replace them, and put their maintainers in the Uploaders (I hope you don't mind). If nobo