On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 05:57, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz (05/02/2009):
Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
Ubuntu user that he will rather consider
hence no reason to allow for a transition to testing. Moreover, I
promise that pymvpa will not attempt such thing ;-)
What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it?
Sphinx 0.4.3 is the classic example: It causes more trouble than it
fixed. For example try building
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
3) upload to experimental
3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental)
I'd recommends this.
Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
3) upload to experimental
3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental)
I'd recommends this.
Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz (05/02/2009):
Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA
himself, because he cannot use debian experimental. Of course.
So he needs to invest his time in the
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz (05/02/2009):
Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a
Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA
himself, because he cannot use debian
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz writes:
I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
understand that with the current setup (e.g. unstable, testing, ..),
there is probably no other way.
I'm unhappy about it too, but I don't understand it. Where can I find
an explanation
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:17:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz writes:
I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
understand that with the current setup (e.g. unstable, testing, ..),
there is probably no other way.
I'm unhappy about
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au (06/02/2009):
I'm unhappy about it too, but I don't understand it. Where can I find
an explanation for the necessity of freezing ‘unstable’ when preparing
to release ‘testing’?
For more than verbose explanations, see -devel@ a few weeks ago,
starting at
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:24:47AM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:17:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz writes:
I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time, but I
understand that with the current setup (e.g. unstable,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:50:36AM +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:24:47AM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:17:11PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz writes:
I am unhappy that unstable gets frozen for such a long time,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:15:47AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]:
I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually
build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine
that -- it might provide some facts about
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26]
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:15:47AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]:
I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually
build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine
that -- it
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:47:02AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26]
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:15:47AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]:
I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually
build-depend
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26]
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:47:02AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it?
Sphinx 0.4.3 is the classic example: It causes more trouble than it
fixed. For example try building pymvpa's docs with it -- it
Hi,
I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our
svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please
test the package?
There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on sphinx-0.5,
which is currently only in experimental. And also upstream
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on sphinx-0.5,
which is currently only in experimental. And also upstream doesn't
have it in the tarball. I originally fixed that by
adding a new target into debian/rules, that downloaded the upstream
tgz,
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:53:05AM -0800, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our
svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please
test the package?
There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on
Ondrej Certik schrieb:
Hi,
I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our
svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please
test the package?
numpy becomes big. see https://launchpad.net/bugs/309215. In the past the parts
depending on external
Hi,
Ondrej Certik wrote:
I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build
without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's
a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that this is
what unstable is for. Otherwise people will have to move from
Ondrej Certik wrote:
I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build
without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's
a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that this is
what unstable is for. Otherwise people will have to move from
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
Hi,
Ondrej Certik wrote:
I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build
without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's
a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
I really want it in unstable.
I want unstable not to be affected by testing freeze as well, but that's
all what I will say in this topic before Lenny's release.
For now, if we want to give maintainers, whose packages are depending on
our packages, a possibility to
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25]
To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable?
This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems
which prevent successful building of docs (e.g. image/figure handling
bug) -- and at least this one is solved in 0.5.
if
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25]
To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable?
This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems
which prevent successful building of docs (e.g.
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
if you will help me convince release managers to unblock it, I will
upload 0.5 to unstable (if Mikhail will not protest).
So release managers are blocking any uploads of sphinx to unstable?
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote:
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25]
I really want it in unstable.
I want unstable not to be affected by testing freeze as well, but that's
all what I will say in this topic before Lenny's release.
For now, if we want to give
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:47:06PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25]
To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable?
This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems
which prevent successful building of docs (e.g.
* Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]:
I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually
build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine
that -- it might provide some facts about the situation we are
speculating about.
% zcat
29 matches
Mail list logo
