Re: ponyorm v0.7.15rc1, python3.10 and github releases

2022-01-11 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Hi Louis-Philippe,

Yeah, that sounds good to me - thanks for working on ponyorm!

Jelmer

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:05:06PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Upstream ponyorm released v0.7.15rc1, which adds python3.10 support and
> thus fixes #1000716. I ran a quick sbuild and the testsuite passes and
> everything seems good.
> 
> Since it is team maintained, I'd have updated the package in unstable,
> but the latest pypi tarball changes the default carriage return, and
> creates a huge diff on the upstream branch. This causes some patches to
> fail to apply, etc.
> 
> Would you mind if I migrated ponyorm to the github releases, using
> uscan's git mode? I've made a quick test and it does solves this issue :)
> 
> Asking, since I'd be pretty upset if someone were to do the opposite on
> a package I team maintain :P
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -- 
>   ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
>   ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
>   ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
>   ⠈⠳⣄





ponyorm v0.7.15rc1, python3.10 and github releases

2022-01-10 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
Hello!

Upstream ponyorm released v0.7.15rc1, which adds python3.10 support and
thus fixes #1000716. I ran a quick sbuild and the testsuite passes and
everything seems good.

Since it is team maintained, I'd have updated the package in unstable,
but the latest pypi tarball changes the default carriage return, and
creates a huge diff on the upstream branch. This causes some patches to
fail to apply, etc.

Would you mind if I migrated ponyorm to the github releases, using
uscan's git mode? I've made a quick test and it does solves this issue :)

Asking, since I'd be pretty upset if someone were to do the opposite on
a package I team maintain :P

Cheers,

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature