Updating python-pint, and python-pint vs python-babel

2022-11-29 Thread Stuart Prescott
Hi folks The version of python-pint currently in sid is not compatible with the version of python-babel, with the version of babel being too new. The result is that pint currently FTBFS in sid: #1022469. The pint package has received a substantial update from its upstream authors. This new

Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix?

2020-11-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/27/20 1:13 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > A good way to decide this is to think about what we would do if we had a > Python 4 that is incompatible with Python 3 (which I assume will happen > eventually, although hopefully not for a few years). It is very likely that you're wrongly guessing. Num

Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix?

2020-11-27 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 22:33:19 +0100, Steffen Möller wrote: > On 26.11.20 13:16, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Currently src:python-babel provides 3 binaries: > > > > * python3-babel > > * python-babel-doc > > * python-babel-localedata > > > > of which py

Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix?

2020-11-26 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Nilesh, On 26.11.20 13:16, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > > Currently src:python-babel provides 3 binaries: > > * python3-babel > * python-babel-doc > * python-babel-localedata > > of which python3-babel is the main binary, -babel-doc is for the > documentatio

Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix?

2020-11-26 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/26/20 1:16 PM, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > > Currently src:python-babel provides 3 binaries: > > * python3-babel > * python-babel-doc > * python-babel-localedata > > of which python3-babel is the main binary, -babel-doc is for the > documentation and -b

Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix?

2020-11-26 Thread Nilesh Patra
Hi, Currently src:python-babel provides 3 binaries: * python3-babel * python-babel-doc * python-babel-localedata of which python3-babel is the main binary, -babel-doc is for the documentation and -babel-localedata is for storing locale data files used by python3-babel. Should this be renamed

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
On 11.02.2020 16:55, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: On 11.02.2020 15:44, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 2/11/20 11:16 AM, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: # Generate the local

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 2/11/20 4:45 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> In such case, could you provide me with the source package, rather than >> just letting me try with Git? Maybe this is going to work then... > > whatever turns out to be, please ensure the package is buildable from > the git repo. and matches what's going

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
On 11.02.2020 15:44, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 2/11/20 11:16 AM, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: # Generate the localedata folder data out of the xml files # download

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Sandro Tosi
> In such case, could you provide me with the source package, rather than > just letting me try with Git? Maybe this is going to work then... whatever turns out to be, please ensure the package is buildable from the git repo. and matches what's going to be uploaded. We have already enough packages

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 2/11/20 11:16 AM, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: > >> >> I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the >> Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: >> >> # Generate the localedata folder data out of the xml files >&

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: # Generate the localedata folder data out of the xml files # downloaded in debian/repack scripts/import_cldr.py common Processing root.xml (Language = root; Territory

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Jonathan Carter
On 2020/02/11 12:16, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: > I can't replicate this. I tried with cowbuilder/pbuilder and sbuild and > the build completes fine on my systems. Ok, thanks. I'll check on a chroot on my system later too to try to see what's going on, but swamped at the moment so can't check righ

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: # Generate the localedata folder data out of the xml files # downloaded in debian/repack scripts/import_cldr.py common Processing root.xml (Language = root; Territory

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hi Håvard On 2020/02/11 10:33, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I tried to build python-babel to sponsor the upload from what's in the > Git in the DPMT, and it failed to build for me: I'm removing it from the channel topic in the meantime, please re-add when the building is resolved,

Re: python-babel

2020-02-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 1/10/20 8:50 PM, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: > Hello, > > The python-babel [1] package is currently broken, there isn't any bugs > reported yet, but after the transit to > python3.8 it failed the testsuite. New upstream version 2.7.0 and above > fixes these issues. > T

python-babel

2020-01-10 Thread Håvard Flaget Aasen
Hello, The python-babel [1] package is currently broken, there isn't any bugs reported yet, but after the transit to python3.8 it failed the testsuite. New upstream version 2.7.0 and above fixes these issues. To update the package there is a 'repack' script which i believe i

Re: Python-babel 1.3 available from Sid

2013-10-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
uctive, this attitude doesn't help. Mind you, I spent hours on this update, and did quite some work. It's not a perfect work I admit, but it did what it should have: have python-babel and python3-babel available for others to use, on time for my purpose (which is to have OpenStack ready fo

Re: Python-babel 1.3 available from Sid

2013-10-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2013-10-08 12:52:35, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/08/2013 03:34 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Hi > > > > On 2013-10-08 00:50:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> FYI, I have uploaded python-babel 1.3 in Sid. I couldn't wait fo

Re: Python-babel 1.3 available from Sid

2013-10-08 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2013-10-08 09:13:54, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 8 octobre 2013 07:18 CEST, Andrey Rahmatullin  : > > >> Though probably writing in this bug would > >> have been more efficient than writing in the topic of the IRC channel? > > > Yes, that's my only mistake. > > Though of course it's a fundamen

Re: Python-babel 1.3 available from Sid

2013-10-08 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 8 octobre 2013 07:18 CEST, Andrey Rahmatullin  : >> Though probably writing in this bug would >> have been more efficient than writing in the topic of the IRC channel? > Yes, that's my only mistake. > Though of course it's a fundamental problem with non-DD packages: I've > made a package I fi

Re: Python-babel 1.3 available from Sid

2013-10-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
, though I'd like to know what's the way to > fix the VCS. What's the new path for it? svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/python-modules/packages/python-babel/trunk -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Python-babel 1.3 available from Sid

2013-10-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/08/2013 03:34 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi > > On 2013-10-08 00:50:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi, >> >> FYI, I have uploaded python-babel 1.3 in Sid. I couldn't wait for more, >> so I did the work... >> >> I haven't pus

Re: Python-babel 1.3 available from Sid

2013-10-07 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Hi On 2013-10-08 00:50:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > FYI, I have uploaded python-babel 1.3 in Sid. I couldn't wait for more, > so I did the work... > > I haven't pushed to the SVN, because git-svn is producing some weird > errors. Andrey, could yo