On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:05:32AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
The reason I said site-packages is the _right_ way, is it makes mailman
modules usable from other applications. However, I agree that we shouldn't
_require_ application specific modules to be in site-packages, particularly
when
send a patch for the policy.
Bastian Kleineidam writes:
python-central (0.4) unstable; urgency=low
* renamed register-python-package to python-register, this way
its prefixed with python (and its shorter ;)
as long as python-central handles libraries/modules only, it should be
called
.
The Depends option is what is in the current policy. The python-central
man page was not matching the current policy.
Bastian Kleineidam writes:
python-central (0.4) unstable; urgency=low
* renamed register-python-package to python-register, this way
its prefixed with python
Donovan Baarda wrote:
But this is redundant... if the package is installed, the corresponding *.py
files _should_ be unpacked. How is testing for the existance of a file any
better indication than testing for installation of the package?
True... I think I'll try to blame my flawed argument on lack
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 12:23:38AM +1200, Carey Evans wrote:
Donovan Baarda wrote:
[...]
It might also be nice to have separate files that list the directories
or source files to compile for each package, and have python-central
call compileall itself, but I guess this is a separate issue.
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 12:26:30AM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
Hi,
uploaded the new version 0.4 at
http://people.debian.org/~calvin/python-central/
python-central (0.4) unstable; urgency=low
* renamed register-python-package to python-register, this way
its prefixed
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 11:29:02PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
I've just had a look at this and it looks good. It perfectly meets the
requirement of allowing pure python module packages to support multiple
pythonX.Y python packages simultaniously.
The only problem is we are still missing
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 05:51:30PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 11:29:02PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
I've just had a look at this and it looks good. It perfectly meets the
requirement of allowing pure python module packages to support multiple
pythonX.Y python
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 08:19:49AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
| On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 08:13:23AM +1200, Carey Evans wrote:
| It also makes it easier for users to modify if a Python package's
| dependencies are incorrect, and it stops compiling under a newer version
| of Python, making
Hi,
uploaded the new version 0.4 at
http://people.debian.org/~calvin/python-central/
python-central (0.4) unstable; urgency=low
* renamed register-python-package to python-register, this way
its prefixed with python (and its shorter ;)
* add options to enable/suppress the compiling
10 matches
Mail list logo