On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:38:16PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
| On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 22:03, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
| > > Hrm, this could be achieved quite simply, /methinks. It needs little
| > > changes in dh_python and some prerm/postinst stuff in the python package
| > > (not the pythonX.Y
Hi,
Donovan Baarda wrote:
> Note that there is currently a bug in dpkg-query where ${Depends} output
> is prefixed with some binary garbage... this means your modification
> will not match where $PYTHONXY is the first dependency.
>
Ouch.
> I don't believe you could use python in this case... thi
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 12:54, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > Using this the python package can "notify" all packages that depend on
> > it by calling dpkg-reconfigure on them;
>
> That would work for me too, of course.
>
> >> egrep "^install ok installed:[^:]*:.*$PYT
> Depending on Python 2.3 when a package works fine with 2.1 and 2.2
> as well is not a good solution in my opinion.
Modem users must spend an extra hour downloading just to get a tiny
package too.
Hi,
Donovan Baarda wrote:
> Using this the python package can "notify" all packages that depend on
> it by calling dpkg-reconfigure on them;
That would work for me too, of course.
>> egrep "^install ok installed:[^:]*:.*$PYTHONXY([ ,]|$)" | \
That regexp looks like it should look like this ins
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 22:03, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > Hrm, this could be achieved quite simply, /methinks. It needs little
> > changes in dh_python and some prerm/postinst stuff in the python package
> > (not the pythonX.Y package) to rebuild all .pyc's and .pyo'
Hi, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Hrm, this could be achieved quite simply, /methinks. It needs little
> changes in dh_python and some prerm/postinst stuff in the python package
> (not the pythonX.Y package) to rebuild all .pyc's and .pyo's in this
> directory upon upgrade.
>
> Matthias, do you think
Le lun 11/08/2003 à 01:08, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> The recently suggested alternative of putting modules in
> /usr/lib/site-python (or wherever) with only one set of *.pyc's for
> the default python is much simpler. It does rely on "root" only using
> the default python to avoid re-compiling pyc
Le lun 11/08/2003 à 01:04, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> you end up with multiple packages where the only difference is the
> versioned depends on python not very efficient.
I'm not saying it is efficient, but it is simple and it works.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:58:21PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Donovan Baarda writes:
> > Does anyone want me to contibute some code to try and do this? I think
> > the "python-central" stuff has most of the code to handle this, it just
> > needs a little bit of tweaking.
>
> sure, that would b
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 09:45:29PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dim 10/08/2003 ? 16:12, Lars Wirzenius a ?crit :
> > Depending on Python 2.3 when a package works fine with 2.1 and 2.2 as
> > well is not a good solution in my opinion. It prevents, for example,
> > being able to use the packag
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 05:26:23PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
> > (There will be a problem when the default version of Python changes. I
> > don't think we have a way to deal with that.)
>
> Why not simply call compileall.py for each dirctory in the PYTHONPATH
>
Le dim 10/08/2003 à 16:12, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> Depending on Python 2.3 when a package works fine with 2.1 and 2.2 as
> well is not a good solution in my opinion. It prevents, for example,
> being able to use the package on woody, even if it is uploaded only into
> stable. (This happens to be
Hi, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> (There will be a problem when the default version of Python changes. I
> don't think we have a way to deal with that.)
Why not simply call compileall.py for each dirctory in the PYTHONPATH
from "python"s postinst?
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de
On su, 2003-08-10 at 15:56, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> If you can provide a good solution to achieve this, it will surely be
> welcome. In the meantime, please don't do what you describe with
> packages shipping .py files. You should depend on python (>= 2.3),
> python (<< 2.4) - this can be done au
I subscribe debian-python. Please don't Cc me when you reply to the
list.
On su, 2003-08-10 at 13:06, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius writes:
> > Um, yeah, it does contain a .pyc. I don't think it should: the postinst
> > compiles the eoc.py file. The inclusion of the .pyc file seems like a
Le dim 10/08/2003 à 14:44, Donovan Baarda a écrit :
> There are probably some packages that have "Depends: python" that work
> with a whole variety of versions of python. Provided they compile their
> modules with "/usr/bin/python" in their postinst, and remove the pyc's
> and pyo's in their postrm
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 17:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This seems to be a common misunderstanding. Therefore the CC to
> debian-python that I have something as a reference.
[...]
> > As far as I know, it already works with Python 2.3. And 2.2. And 2.1. I
> > like the fact that the same package works
Lars Wirzenius writes:
> Um, yeah, it does contain a .pyc. I don't think it should: the postinst
> compiles the eoc.py file. The inclusion of the .pyc file seems like a
> bug due to unforeseen interaction with the upstream Makefile's install
> target. I'll have to remove the .pyc from the .deb in t
On su, 2003-08-10 at 10:55, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This seems to be a common misunderstanding. Therefore the CC to
> debian-python that I have something as a reference.
ACK. (I'm on -python, so further Cc's are not necessary.)
> Lars Wirzenius writes:
> > As far as I know, it already works with
This seems to be a common misunderstanding. Therefore the CC to
debian-python that I have something as a reference.
Lars Wirzenius writes:
> On la, 2003-08-09 at 03:22, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Please upgrade your packages soon, or ask on debian-python for NMU's or
> > help.
> > If the package d
Le sam 09/08/2003 à 02:24, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Please upgrade your packages soon, or ask on debian-python for NMU's or help.
> If the package doesn't work with 2.3, please explicitely depend on the 2.2
> packages.
>
> I'll do NMU's for some "base" packages, if I see missing these packages.
22 matches
Mail list logo
