Re: reference package python3 PAPT

[Dmitry Shachnev]

Hi Geert!

On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:29:01PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > I think pymilter-milters is in pretty good shape (as of the version I just 
> > uploaded), keeping in mind it's still python2 and if your upstream supports 
> > it, you should try to go python3.
>
> Thank you,  it got me started.
>
> And I have updated the subject line with the intention
> that more possible reference packages are being reported.

You can take a look at my retext package.

It is Python 3 and in a good shape. The --no-rename option is specific
to retext, but everything else is quite generic.

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: reference package python3 PAPT

[Geert Stappers]

On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 05:52:22PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sunday, December 23, 2018 05:22:07 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Which PAPT package is a fairly good shape to be used as reference
> > for bringing another PAPT package in better shape?
> > 
> > 
> > Context:
> > I'm new to PAPT and would like to have some examples packages.
> 
> I think pymilter-milters is in pretty good shape (as of the version I just 
> uploaded), keeping in mind it's still python2 and if your upstream supports 
> it, you should try to go python3.

Thank you,  it got me started.

And I have updated the subject line with the intention
that more possible reference packages are being reported.


Groeten
Geert Stappers
Who cautiously begins to understand that there is nothing really special
about packaging Python applications. But still in doubt.
-- 
Leven en laten leven