Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 13 septembre 2009 à 02:23 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
>> The patch looks pretty much hackish and I could imagine that it will break a
>> backport of cdbs to Lenny as python2.4 is called with --install-layout=deb,
>> too.
>
> Of course, if you backport thi
Le dimanche 13 septembre 2009 à 02:23 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
> The patch looks pretty much hackish and I could imagine that it will break a
> backport of cdbs to Lenny as python2.4 is called with --install-layout=deb,
> too.
Of course, if you backport things without thinking of what they
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 12 septembre 2009 à 13:23 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
>> One thing that would make the transition simpler (that could be done now)
>> is to get CDBS to add the patch in
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537373
>
> Marc Dequènes agreed for
Le samedi 12 septembre 2009 à 13:23 -0400, Scott Kitterman a écrit :
> One thing that would make the transition simpler (that could be done now)
> is to get CDBS to add the patch in
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=537373
Marc Dequènes agreed for a NMU to add this patch, so I gu
>
>
>
> Akira Kitada wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Nicolas Chauvat
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It would indeed be nice if someone could list the hurdles that stand
>>> between us and Python 2.6 in Squeeze, or point us to the web page that
>>> lists them.
>>>
>>> Python2.6 is in experimental
Josselin Mouette that he will post an analysis of which
> packages need updating soon.
>
Thanks for updating this thread with that new information.
I think it would be great if Python 2.6 (and maybe even 3.1) could be part
of Squeeze. Whether 2.5 or 2.6 are the default is less important the
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Nicolas Chauvat
wrote:
>
> It would indeed be nice if someone could list the hurdles that stand
> between us and Python 2.6 in Squeeze, or point us to the web page that
> lists them.
>
> Python2.6 is in experimental:
> http://packages.debian.org/source/experimenta
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 26 août 2009 à 10:14 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
>> I saw recently that RT did not list 2.6 as default Python as a release
>> goal. I also saw a thread talking about the problems related to 2.6.
>> Does this mean Squeeze won't use it by default or ar
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 09:20:51PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> I'm confident that, if the right coordination of effort and publicity of
> the necessary to-do tasks were applied, there would be ample willingness
> From Debian members who want Python 2.6 in Debian Squeeze.
It would indeed be nice if
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le mercredi 26 août 2009 à 10:14 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
> > I saw recently that RT did not list 2.6 as default Python as a
> > release goal. I also saw a thread talking about the problems related
> > to 2.6. Does this mean Squeeze won't use it by default
Le mercredi 26 août 2009 à 10:14 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe a écrit :
> I saw recently that RT did not list 2.6 as default Python as a release
> goal. I also saw a thread talking about the problems related to 2.6.
> Does this mean Squeeze won't use it by default or are u guys working
> on it?
In
Hi,
I saw recently that RT did not list 2.6 as default Python as a release
goal. I also saw a thread talking about the problems related to 2.6.
Does this mean Squeeze won't use it by default or are u guys working
on it?
It always seems a great challenge everytime there's a switch of
defaults. Is
12 matches
Mail list logo
