Removing w32 specific Python code from a package

Hello debian-python and DPMT, I have just noticed that a bug against one of the packages I help maintaining was reported [0] over at Launchpad that is caused by w32-specific code shipping with my package (python-pyglet). Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely free

Re: Removing w32 specific Python code from a package

* Stephan Peijnik [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:58 +0100]: Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely free anyways I thought I could get rid of this problem by simply removing the w32-specifics when repackaging the dfsg version of the tarball. What about just not

Leaving DPMT?

Hello. There's no f* way in hell I'm gonna keep using SVN. (That's not a troll, a flame, whatever. Just a statement.) That's why I'm planning to move python-{networkx,pygraphviz} out of DPMT's svn and move them to collab-maint's set of git repositories. Now, question: should I keep DPMT in

Re: Leaving DPMT?

Hi, [Cyril Brulebois, 2009-02-26] That's why I'm planning to move python-{networkx,pygraphviz} out of DPMT's svn and move them to collab-maint's set of git repositories. Now, question: should I keep DPMT in Uploaders, or drop it? please remove it, one exception will lead to other requests

Re: Leaving DPMT?

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote: Hi, [Cyril Brulebois, 2009-02-26] That's why I'm planning to move python-{networkx,pygraphviz} out of DPMT's svn and move them to collab-maint's set of git repositories. Now, question: should I keep DPMT in Uploaders,

Re: Leaving DPMT?

Ondrej Certik wrote: Currently I think Sandro is the last major contributor for DPMT who wants to stay in svn. I don't think I count as major contributor, but I'm distrustful about changing too. Emilio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#517308: python-syck: lacks a python-support dependency

Package: python-syck Version: 0.61.2-1 Severity: serious The package uses python-support but does not depend on it. The dependency should be auto-generated in a substvar, you just have to add the proper substvar. Note: the package is unmaintained, someone from the python team should probably

Re: Major update of python-support

Le mercredi 18 février 2009 à 23:55 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : However I wish I could be so sure about building packages, but the metadata format has changed so you can expect some big failures. I have used a few sample packages during my testing, but this is far from enough. I have