Re: ITP or RFP

2011-05-25 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Nicolas CANIART, 2011-05-24] Thanks for the faster than light answers. With respect to Sandro answer, I don't see why I couldn't join the Python Module Team, but my participation may remain marginal. I estimate I can almost guarantee a two year commitment to that package, beyond I cannot

Re: ITP or RFP

2011-05-25 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org, 2011-05-25, 10:15: source package name doesn't matter that much, but please use python-pages rather than python-django-page-cms as binary package's name (as Debian Python Policy suggests) And pages is very bad name for a public Python module, especially if

Re: Bug#627787: ITP or RFP

2011-05-25 Thread Nicolas CANIART
I'm still reading the Debian Python policy, but thanks for the advice. The upstream author has plans to rename the package. Maybe I can wait he completed the transition / help him with the transition so it happens sooner. 2011/5/25 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org: * Piotr Ożarowski

dh_strip and Python Extensions

2011-05-25 Thread Nikolaus Rath
Hello, I'm not quite sure when this started, but dh_strip is placing my Python .so extensions into /usr/lib/debug/..., which makes Lintian complain: $ dpkg-buildpackage [...] dh_strip -v -a -ppython-llfuse --dbg-package=python-llfuse-dbg; install -d