Hi Piotr (2015.09.29_23:05:19_+0200)
> we agreed to something - 1 package per person, just for tests, with
> reports sent to this mailing list. Can you point me to a single report?
> Can you point me to a single person who converted only one package?
Me. I didn't report-back as such. I just rolled
Hi Sandro (2015.10.02_22:46:00_+0200)
> those are not many days to review the results of the conversions: can
> you (or Stefano) share what were the problems that delayed the
> transition, so that we can check in particular those aspects of the
> packages we know the most?
I did that several month
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Sandro (2015.10.02_22:46:00_+0200)
>> those are not many days to review the results of the conversions: can
>> you (or Stefano) share what were the problems that delayed the
>> transition, so that we can check in particular those aspects
On jeu. 01 oct. 2015 à 18:48:08, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, October 01, 2015 02:11:29 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Oct 01, 2015, at 07:47 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > >I am a bit worried that the team is handled behind closed walls.
> >
> > I have no particular interest in either grab
[Pierre-Elliott Bécue, 2015-10-03]
> Yes, do-it-o-craty is good, at some point, but this is exactly what brought
> Thomas out. So nope, it's not enough.
and if I didn't do it, it would be better because...
It's easy to point fingers if it's not you who cleans after each mess.
/me (AKA dictator wh
On Oct 03, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>what were the problems that -in the last period- delayed the conversion? were
>they just lack of time (understandable) or were they technical in the
>conversion process?
The very last patch I forwarded to Stefano involved correctly setting the tag
On sam. 03 oct. 2015 à 16:15:53, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Pierre-Elliott Bécue, 2015-10-03]
> > Yes, do-it-o-craty is good, at some point, but this is exactly what brought
> > Thomas out. So nope, it's not enough.
>
> and if I didn't do it, it would be better because...
> It's easy to point finge
> A good way to test that (when Stefano puts up the next test conversion) is to
> make some change, then `git-dpm tag` and verify that the tag form is correct.
> Be sure you don't have any settings in ~/.gitconfig though.
if the last is a strong requirement, honestly it seems fragile:
~/.gitconfig
On Oct 03, 2015, at 03:50 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>if the last is a strong requirement, honestly it seems fragile: ~/.gitconfig
>applies to all the git repos I have (and I may want to specify a tag format
>there), while what is set in debian/.git-dpm (is this the file where the tag
>format is set r
Hi Sandro (2015.10.03_12:47:20_+0200)
> I probably didnt make myself clear at first, let me retry: what were
> the problems that -in the last period- delayed the conversion?
No significant failures, but I wanted to setup an mr config, which I've
done now:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-mod
Hello Stefano,
many thanks for working on this!
On Saturday 03 October 2015 20:52:21 Stefano Rivera wrote:
[CUT list of packages]
> Cannot "git-dpm init" package: python-charade
charade was fortunately merged into chardet so we can also remove the SVN
repository (or ignore it).
Cheers,
--
Da
Hi Daniele (2015.10.03_21:36:52_+0200)
> charade was fortunately merged into chardet so we can also remove the SVN
> repository (or ignore it).
Yeah, I think there'll be a bunch of those. I basically migrated
everything from the SVN history, that didn't break horrifically. Then we
can strip it do
12 matches
Mail list logo