Dear Python-modules team,
is anyone interested (or already working on) packaging python-dotenv?
From all *dotenv packages it is currently the most famous one for
python. It allows for using .env files in python and provides a command
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi
> > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch.
> > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3
> > python3-seaborn - statistical
On 2017-06-20 16:40:26 +0200 (+0200), Matthias Klose wrote:
> another one many openstack packages.
Spot checking the source packages in the archive currently, it looks
like Thomas already has most of these done.
By way of background there, a coordinated effort has been underway
On 10.06.2017 05:32, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 06, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> if we plan (and it looks like we do) to support and distribute 2.7
>> with buster, why not support it *properly*? what's the point of
>> deprecating python2.7? either we ship it or not, but if we do
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi
> I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch.
> % apt-cache search statsmodels python3
> python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library
statsmodels is maintained by Debian
Mail list logo