Re: What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies?

2019-09-16 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 19-09-16 08 h 00, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > po 16. 9. 2019 v 9:55 odesílatel Mattia Rizzolo napsal: > >> I wonder, I think the historical reasons for papt and dpmt to be separated >> don't quite stand anymore. Perhaps the only difference left is the actual >> technical difference between

Re: Streamlining the use of Salsa CI on team packages

2019-09-16 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Louis-Philippe Véronneau: > On 19-09-05 01 h 40, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: >> Hello folks! >> >> I'd like to propose we start using Salsa CI for all the team packages. I >> think using a good CI for all our packages will help us find packaging >> bugs and fix errors before uploads :) >>

Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing?

2019-09-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Note that dak doesn't check autopkgtest deps. I'm using grep-dctrl -FTestsuite-triggers $pkg -sPackage /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources for that. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Streamlining the use of Salsa CI on team packages

2019-09-16 Thread Marcin Kulisz
On 15 September 2019 23:01:46 BST, Thomas Goirand wrote: snip >This tells "instance_type: g1-small", which doesn't match any name at: >https://cloud.google.com/compute/vm-instance-pricing > >Am I right that this is n1-standard-1, which is 1 VCPU and 3.75 GB? Nop, this is incorrect you're

Re: Packages depending on python-testtools are now RC: is bzr still a thing?

2019-09-16 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 9/16/19 12:31 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 at 23:39:46 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> reverse-depends takes sometimes forever in Sid for a reason I >> can't figure out. And if I'm not mistaking, that's the only tool we have >> that can check reverse dependencies in a

Re: What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies?

2019-09-16 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi, On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, 1:59 am Louis-Philippe Véronneau, wrote: > What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies? I feel the > DPMT policy is pretty good and I feel the PAPT policy could copy a bunch > of stuff from there. > I wonder, I think the historical reasons for papt and

Re: What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies?

2019-09-16 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, po 16. 9. 2019 v 1:59 odesílatel Louis-Philippe Véronneau napsal: > What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies? we don't have process/policy to update policy. So I will propose one and let's add this process to policy itself: - anyone can submit merge request - with

Re: What is the process to update the DPMT and PAPT policies?

2019-09-16 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, po 16. 9. 2019 v 9:55 odesílatel Mattia Rizzolo napsal: > I wonder, I think the historical reasons for papt and dpmt to be separated > don't quite stand anymore. Perhaps the only difference left is the actual > technical difference between an application and a module as described in > the

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#939181: cycle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-16 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Peter, On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 02:47:50PM +0100, peter green wrote: > > > tmp = rt.encrypt('Cycle{}'.format(pickle.dumps(objSave))) > > > > Thanks to this hint > This hint was *wrong*, it will introduce garbage into the string and the > "rotor" code is clearly designed to work with byte

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#939181: cycle: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2019-09-16 Thread Michael Kesper
Hi Andreas, On 16.09.19 11:38, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 02:47:50PM +0100, peter green wrote: tmp = rt.encrypt('Cycle{}'.format(pickle.dumps(objSave))) >>> >>> Thanks to this hint >> This hint was *wrong*, it will introduce garbage into the string and the