Re: New version of mayavi2 fails to build

2022-02-17 Thread Scott Talbert
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, as you can see in Salsa-CI build log[1] the new version of mayavi2 fails with something like: ... File "/builds/python-team/packages/mayavi2/debian/output/source_dir/mayavi/mlab.py", line 16 in File "", line 228 in _call_with_frames_removed

New version of mayavi2 fails to build

2022-02-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, as you can see in Salsa-CI build log[1] the new version of mayavi2 fails with something like: ... File "/builds/python-team/packages/mayavi2/debian/output/source_dir/mayavi/mlab.py", line 16 in File "", line 228 in _call_with_frames_removed File "", line 850 in exec_module File "",

Re: scikit-learn in unstable FTBFS on arm64, armel, armhf, i386, ppc64el and s390x

2022-02-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, Am Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:09:23PM +0100 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz: > > So, I have skimmed over the build logs and one of the main issues is the use > of > -march flags to enforce a certain baseline [1]: > > powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option >

Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello all, the question is essentially all in the subject line, and my answer is yes. I receive notifications for all MRs opened against DPT packages, and Janitor's are always pretty much ready to merge as is, and so i think we should let Janitor commit directly to the team packages. Jelmer is

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2022-02-17 12 h 39, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello all, > the question is essentially all in the subject line, and my answer is yes. > > I receive notifications for all MRs opened against DPT packages, and > Janitor's are always pretty much ready to merge as is, and so i think > we should let

Request to join the DPT

2022-02-17 Thread Georges Racinet
Hi, I'd like to join the Debian Python Team. My salsa handle: gracinet I have read the team policy [1] and agree with it. My immediate concern would be to package the Evolve Mercurial extension [2], which is an important piece in many recent Mercurial workflows. I see there is an old RFP about

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Sandro Tosi
> I admit I'm hesitating a bit for different reasons. While I agree that > direct commits are better than MRs I found several DPT packages with > very sensible changes in Git but no uploads following these. For > instance fixing VCS fields and Maintainer name should be followed by an > according

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Nilesh Patra
On 2/18/22 2:23 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: I admit I'm hesitating a bit for different reasons. While I agree that direct commits are better than MRs I found several DPT packages with very sensible changes in Git but no uploads following these. For instance fixing VCS fields and Maintainer name

Re: New version of mayavi2 fails to build

2022-02-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Scott, Am Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:27:12AM -0500 schrieb Scott Talbert: > Looking at the full log, it appears as if something in the build process is > trying to open an X display and fails. Perhaps try running dh_auto_build > with Xvfb? Yes, thanks for the very helpful hint Andreas.

Re: Should we allow Janitor to commit directly to all DPT packages?

2022-02-17 Thread Emmanuel Arias
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 2:48 PM Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 2022-02-17 12 h 39, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Hello all, > > the question is essentially all in the subject line, and my answer is > yes. > > > > I receive notifications for all MRs opened against DPT packages, and > > Janitor's