Re: on the lack of a `python-` prefix for source packages

2022-12-19 Thread Steffen Moeller
Am 12.12.2022 um 02:24 schrieb Sandro Tosi: Proposal: the DPT will start adding a `python-` prefix to NEW source packages names, unless the upstream project already contains it AFAICT all other major languages ecosystems packaging teams use a (semi?)mandatory tag to identify their source

Re: bumping python3-multiplex to v0.6 assistance

2022-12-19 Thread Sandro Tosi
i just uploaded multiplex_0.6.0-1 it's gonna reach the archive soon On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 5:39 PM Marcel Partap wrote: > > Hi deb-py, > to simultanously write images of our debian-based live distro > https://github.com/fsfw-dresden/usb-live-linux to USB pen drives, I've > managed to create a

Re: How do you create entry-points for Python applications?

2022-12-19 Thread Stuart Prescott
On 20/12/2022 00:09, Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی wrote: > The only package I maintain that I can think of at the moment with entrypoints and project.toml is too complicated to be a good example. That shouldn't be so much different from setup.py projects and there are plenty of them in

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2022-12-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 06:02:58PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 04:10:05PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > On 12/13/22 13:34, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > If Python 3.11 is the default, then it is highly likely that Spyder > > > will not be included: debugpy, which is a

Re: How do you create entry-points for Python applications?

2022-12-19 Thread Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی
> The only package I maintain that I can think of at the moment with > entrypoints and project.toml is too complicated to be a good example. That shouldn't be so much different from setup.py projects and there are plenty of them in archive.

Re: How do you create entry-points for Python applications?

2022-12-19 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 07:18:44PM +, c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: > Hello, > a python application isn't a binary but a script. So to invoke such an > application there need to be a shell script somewhere in PATH that invoke > that script via python3 interpreter. Imagine an application with a GUI

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2022-12-19 Thread Julian Gilbey
Hi Jochen, On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 04:53:58PM +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Hi Julian, > > * Julian Gilbey [2022-12-19 09:41]: > > Quick update: with the updating of python3-bytecode from 0.13 to 0.14 > > in unstable/testing, which allows it to handle Python 3.11, something > > has changed

Re: Python 3.11 for bookworm?

2022-12-19 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Hi Julian, * Julian Gilbey [2022-12-19 09:41]: Quick update: with the updating of python3-bytecode from 0.13 to 0.14 in unstable/testing, which allows it to handle Python 3.11, something has changed and now pydevd doesn't even pass the tests on Python 3.10. The python3-bytecode underwent a

bumping python3-multiplex to v0.6 assistance

2022-12-19 Thread Marcel Partap
Hi deb-py, to simultanously write images of our debian-based live distro https://github.com/fsfw-dresden/usb-live-linux to USB pen drives, I've managed to create a tool using the multiplex python library requiring version 0.6 which is not yet updated in debian. I tried applying the upstream

Re: bumping python3-multiplex to v0.6 assistance

2022-12-19 Thread Marcel Partap
Ah thanks, that was quick, very awesome : ) i just uploaded multiplex_0.6.0-1 it's gonna reach the archive soon