On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:41:08PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Julian (2023.02.05_10:38:23_+)
>
> > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
> > bookworm?
>
> Because we aim to have a single Python release supported in every stable
> release.
I am not
I'd like to join the team. Right now I'd like to just fix
python-service-identity in order to fix an FTBFS in one of my packages
(python-trustme, bug 1030487). It just needs a cherry-pick of
https://github.com/pyca/service-identity/commit/705f4af829adf4d1b6e44250d8039635a73199d5,
but it's about
Hi Danial (2023.01.15_09:54:38_+)
> I am Danial Behzadi and I want to join Debian Python Team to maintain
> package [python-fire](1) through this team as that's an orphaned
> dependency of my current package [tractor](2) as [requested](3) by DDs.
Added, sorry about the delay, welcome.
SR
--
Hi Julian (2023.02.05_10:38:23_+)
> Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
> bookworm?
Because we aim to have a single Python release supported in every stable
release.
> I was trying to run some experiments in a virtual environment a few
> days ago, and it turns
Our social contract #4 says "Our priorities are our users and free
software". What benefits would having the python3.10 base packages in
bookworm bring for our users (as I point out, for some users, this is
a necessity) and what disadvantages would it bring (none that I can
think of)? Why would
Hi Julian,
Am 05.02.23 um 11:38 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
bookworm?
Because it would amount to about double the work for all those involved.
Besides, Python 3.11 has some points for it:
- Real performance gains for real
On February 5, 2023 5:22:33 PM UTC, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:41:08PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote:
>> Hi Julian (2023.02.05_10:38:23_+)
>>
>> > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
>> > bookworm?
>>
>> Because we aim to have a single
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:29:10PM +0100, Michael Kesper wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Am 05.02.23 um 11:38 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
> > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
> > bookworm?
>
> Because it would amount to about double the work for all those
Hi Robie (2023.02.05_20:47:01_+)
> I'd like to join the team. Right now I'd like to just fix
> python-service-identity in order to fix an FTBFS in one of my packages
> (python-trustme, bug 1030487). It just needs a cherry-pick of
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Edward Betts
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-countrynames
Version : 1.14.1
Upstream Author : Friedrich Lindenberg
* URL : https://github.com/occrp/countrynames
Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
bookworm?
I was trying to run some experiments in a virtual environment a few
days ago, and it turns out that several of the Python packages I
needed do not yet run on Python 3.11. I was saved by being able to
run in a Python
How about fixing the 3.11 issues if you hit them ? How about using Buster and
3.9 if 3.11 doesn't work (yet) for you ?
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
On Feb 5, 2023 11:38, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>
> Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in
> bookworm?
>
> I was trying to run
12 matches
Mail list logo
