Hello.
I have a lot of packaging experience for ALT Linux and some experience
with Python programming, but no experience with Debian Python packaging (I
have some understanding of general Debian packaging). I want to help with
Python in Debian, what can I do?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:19:36PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
I have a lot of packaging experience for ALT Linux and some experience
with Python programming, but no experience with Debian Python packaging (I
have some understanding of general Debian packaging). I want to help with
Hello.
Many Python modules ship unit tests which do not require module
instalation or user interaction and so can be run automatically during the
build time. They can be a very good QA tool, but it looks like they are
not used in all packages.
python-pylons: not used
python-pybabel: not used
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:17:47AM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
It would be nice if dh auto-detected a setup.py (and/or missing Makefile)
and didn't run 'make test' in that case, so that the
override_dh_auto_test wasn't necessary. Yah, I should create a bug and
patch for that.
I
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:47:20AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
It would be nice if dh auto-detected a setup.py (and/or missing Makefile) and
didn't run 'make test' in that case, so that the override_dh_auto_test wasn't
necessary. Yah, I should create a bug and patch for that.
Note that tests
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:23:51PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
I wasn't aware of the existence of a test target.
It's a setuptools feature if I understand correctly
(setuptools.command.test) and it needs specific test* arguments to
setup(). Not all modules support it, some have custom
Some results for popular modules:
http://wiki.debian.org/AndreyRahmatullin/PythonTests
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name
* Package name: ipdb
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Godefroid Chapelle got...@bubblenet.be
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ipdb
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:21:37AM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
After switching python-defaults to python2.7, I'm not sure we discussed
whether to keep python2.6 for Wheezy or not. In theory, we should be able
to
get rid of python2.6 in time for the release (I'd likely be able to act as
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:17:40AM +, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
I have been keeping an eye on pkgme, but I'm not sure it solves the
problem. My concern with automated tools is that they tend to to work for
about 75% of stuff, but there's always a substantial proportion of things
that just do
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:00:03PM +0100, Christoph Mathys wrote:
I try to package mercurial-keyring. However, if I build the binary
package and then try to build the source package, this process fails
because SOURCES.txt has been modified by the binary package build.
Apparently, dh_python2
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Tomás Di Domenico td...@tdido.com.ar, 2012-12-11, 19:41:
I'm trying to get the docs for my python-csb package to build from
source. I've declared the binary package in debian/control along
with the dependency to python-epydoc (=
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:29:05PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
My understanding was that package has Debian Python Team set as
maintainer, such that improvements and co-maintainership is welcomed.
and they are, but switching python helper or introducing a new package
are huge changes enough to
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:09:33PM +0200, B. Clausius wrote:
I am packaging Pybik 1.1 that uses python3-pyicu. python3-pyicu is in
Ubuntu, but not in Debian (bug #671361). What should i do?
1. Just Recommends: python3-pyicu and rely the package is coming sometime
2. Recommends: python3-pyicu
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 03:15:36PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
Note that adding dh-python to Build-Depends enables multiarch support in
dh_python2
What does this change exactly?
--
WBR, wRAR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:44:05PM -0700, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
That seems like an unlikely problem in real world cases - how often will
two people decide to package the same, currently unpackaged, piece of
software, within the couple of days or so before the first one publishes
their work.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 04:17:25PM -0700, Thomas Kluyver wrote:
Packaging often takes much longer than a couple of days, especially if the
packager is not experienced. And when the work is published somewhere, but
not yet uploaded, there is no general way to know if it's published and
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 07:02:59AM +0200, Antoine Musso wrote:
I find the ITP/wnpp annoying as well. I usually end up browsing
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ , opening all links then searching for
my package :-]
I use Google for this.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 08:50:46AM +0200, Etienne Millon wrote:
I find the ITP/wnpp annoying as well. I usually end up browsing
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ , opening all links then searching
for my package :-] I then bootup an instance and try to remember
to report the bug against
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 04:36:23PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
I keep forgetting filling an ITP. It is usually caught on final review
because for some reason lintian is not being run by default by my
packaging chain :-(
For ‘pbuilder’, you can add a hook that automatically runs Lintian on
Hello.
I'm packaging a new version of python-babel and as it now builds 2.x and
3.x packages I decided to move the locale data into /usr/share and package
it separately. Currently the data is installed using 'package_data'
setup() argument and accessed via os.path.dirname(__file__). I've added
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:52:35PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Though probably writing in this bug would
have been more efficient than writing in the topic of the IRC channel?
Yes, that's my only mistake.
Though of course it's a fundamental problem with non-DD packages: I've
made a package I
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 06:35:56PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Sandro has orphaned python-concurrent.futures:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736714
Since it is team maintained, I don't think it really makes sense. Should
we just close the bug report and remove Sandro
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:05:25PM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote:
Hi all,
I'm one of developer of InVesalius [1], an open source medical software.
InVesalius is already packaged to Debian thanks to Debian med. Now I'm
updating the package [2] to the last release of InVesalius.
Until
Uploaded and tagged, thanks!
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Is it still --delay 2 though?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:37:13AM +0200, Onur Aslan wrote:
> I can't use --buildsystem=pybuild to install python wrappers,
> this package is not providing a configure script or Makefile. pybuild
> is not invoking autoreconf to generate a configure script. I have
> to build C library manually if I
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:39:44PM +0200, Onur Aslan wrote:
> > Nothing is invoking autoreconf unless you use --with autoreconf. Are you
> > saying that with pybuild this option has no effect?
>
> I am already using --with autoreconf but when I use:
>
> dh $@ --with
We are down to slightly more than 100 bugs (that includes several packages
that are RC-buggy and dozen or two packages in open transitions, so there
is slightly less things to work on right now) and we need YOUR help.
For majority of packages the work is simple and doesn't require Python
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 12:54:47PM +0200, Cornelius Kölbel wrote:
> It is written in flask and requires additional packages, which are not
> available in Jessie, yet:
>
> * python-flask-cache
> * python-pymysql
This one exists in sid (and in jessie-backports).
> * python-pyjwt
This one exists
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 05:26:08PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I've done hundreds of uploads. Lots of them uploading stuff maintained
> within the DPMT. So far, only a single person complained...
That's not really true.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 08:18:13AM -0800, Ant Dude wrote:
> Again, I renamed the old requests directory for me to use pip again. :(
Why don't you just uninstall the package you've installed manually to
/usr/local? It seems to me you don't need it.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:43:31PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Running virtualenv with interpreter /tmp/bbb/bin/python2
Huh?
> Using real prefix '/usr'
> New python executable in /tmp/virtual/bin/python2
> Also creating executable in /tmp/virtual/bin/python
> Installing setuptools, pip...done.
>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:20:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I would like to come up with a recommendation that if a python module ships
> scripts, Python3 is used for these scripts, and the Python2 version of these
> scripts should be dropped (and python -m ...) should be used instead. An
>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:50:02AM -0500, Thomas Nyberg wrote:
> I've been looking at the offlineimap package on my system (jessie), but in
> my case `/usr/bin/offlineimap` is _not_ a symlink. Also the python code is
> not installed to `/usr/share/offlineimap` and instead to
>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:15:06PM +0100, Ángel Luis wrote:
> I am trying to package |numpy 1.12.1| into deb package.
testing, unstable and jessie-backports contain 1.12.0.
If you really need 1.12.1 you should start with the existing package and
update it, not write all the packaging from
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:39:50AM +0200, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I wanted to fix my terrible track record lately, fix bugs and update my
> packages
> but I ran into problems with sbuild on my package eric.
>
> dpkg-buildpackage -B fails with the following error message:
>
>
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:16:25AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> When it comes to python:Depends, I try to add the right entries in the
> setup.py
Isn't just adding the package names to Depends easier?
> I: dh_python2 pydist:220: Cannot find package that provides opengl. Please
> add
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 04:52:55PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> I usually start to use software, when it arrives in Debian.
> Or I package it. If there is some snap or other third party
> package, I'm unsure how to work with it:
>
> How to install?
I expand the tarball to ~
> How to
On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 06:38:03PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> PS: Is there maybe something broken with the quoting function of
> your MUA? I cannot differentiate between text written by you and
> quoted text. There is no '> ' or whatever...
That's how text parts of text+html mails often
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:32:44AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > After the events of April, I've realized that I have a lot less time,
> > and to be frankly honest, motivation for contributing to Debian right
> > now. So I'm scaling back, but not retiring.
>
> (I don't know what “the events of
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 03:38:09PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I am trying to make our DataLad package to be bi-python finally, but I
> cannot make pybuilder
It's "pybuild".
> neither populate python3-datalad package, nor
> to run tests (using nose) during the build against python3 (runs
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 05:01:21PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I would've expected some info or error message though
> (since I do request python3 explicitly in the call to dh),
I think pybuild doesn't care about --with python3
Maybe it could, though.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 12:11:21AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Yes, I'm talking about the automatically generated -dbgsym packages that
> contain the /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/... files.
Have you read Scott's email?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 08:38:56PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> I was just looking for documentation about what's keeping us from
> getting to python 3
Depends on your definition of "getting to python 3".
> I have also been trying to understand which packages/modules are
> remaining for python 3
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:20:13PM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Maybe it would have been better to say that right now python gives
>
> $ python --version
> Python 2.7.15
>
> To be more precise, I meant to know if 'Bullseye' i.e Debian 11 would
> have python 3.0 as default or not.
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:49:39AM +0100, Guðjón Guðjónsson wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I would like to close bug: #787300 <787...@bugs.debian.org>
>
> and ask for removal of pyqwt5 plus some more Qt4 only packages. But I
> cannot find
>
> info on how to ask for removal of package from the Debian
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 11:47:37PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that will ring a bell for some Python3 programmer and I
> hope to be able to fix this quickly with your help to be able to easily
> provide the Python3 version in addition to Python2.
The package code does not support
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 09:40:44PM +0530, Manas Kashyap wrote:
> While building package i am encountering an error , as per my knowledge the
> changes are made and so they have to be a new patch for it , so should i
> create one or is there some other error , which i don't know .
> error is
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 09:57:50PM +0530, Manas Kashyap wrote:
> Thats what i am saying , the previous author changed some files to upstream
What do you mean? How did they do that?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I try to package porechop[1] but somehow it does not find its dynamic
> library. If I install the resulting package I get:
>
> $ porechop
> could not find cpp_functions.so - please reinstall
SO_FILE = 'cpp_functions.so'
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 09:44:00AM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> sorry if this question has been asked before. What is the currently
> recommended way to make `python` point to `python3`? I'd like to have it set
> on a system default level if possible.
We don't recommend it so there is none
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 09:00:15AM -0400, Dean Serenevy wrote:
> Hello, I am a user of the python3-kivy package and just noticed that kivy is
> no longer listed in buster [1].
>
> Is help needed? (I am not a DD, but I am willing to test and submit packaging
> patches if it would help.)
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 04:33:21PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> looking at the bug log of scikit-learn[1] it seems to be a simple means to do
>
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), dh-autoreconf,
>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:18:50PM -0300, eamanu15 wrote:
> When I build the package using gbp:
>
> *gbp buildpackage --git-upstream-tag="v%(version)s" --git-ignore-new*
>
> This create some other files/folder like this:
> build/
> debian/.debhelper/
> debian/debhelper-build-stamp
> debian/files
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 09:45:52AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> As per [2] I added dh-python to the Build-Depends but it seems I would
> need python-minimal in addition to get /usr/bin/pyversions. For me it
> is a bit strange to realise that this basic functionality is not provided
> by
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:01:20PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > As per [2] I added dh-python to the Build-Depends but it seems I would
> > > need python-minimal in addition to get /usr/bin/pyversions. For me it
> > > is a bit strange to realise that this basic functionality is not provided
>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:11:03AM +0700, Nguyễn Hồng Quân wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > How is this related to my suggestion?
> >
>
>
> Your suggestion is:
>
> "
>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:01:45AM +0700, Nguyễn Hồng Quân wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@wrar.name> wrote:
>
> > > > Adapt it from the 3.6.1 one?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Excuse me. What do you mean by "
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:00:51AM +0700, Nguyễn Hồng Quân wrote:
> Do you mean to use "
> python3.6_3.6.1-1.debian.tar.xz" (of 3.6.1) and change its number to
> "python3.6_3.6.4-4.debian.tar.xz" (of 3.6.4) and change its changelog
> content?
No, I meant to use the debian/ directory from that
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:27:08PM +0700, Nguyễn Hồng Quân wrote:
> > It's not enough to backport the interpreter, all binary modules will need
> > to be recompiled too.
> >
>
> Why?
To be able to be imported in Python3.6.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 01:58:23PM +0700, Nguyễn Hồng Quân wrote:
> Could you please provide an official packaging script for Python 3.6 and
> Debian 9?
It's not enough to backport the interpreter, all binary modules will need
to be recompiled too.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:07:03PM +0700, Nguyễn Hồng Quân wrote:
> So, I try to build Python as deb and use apt to install to my board. I was
> successful to do so with Python 3.6.1, using the .dsc file found on Debian
> buster repo. But since Python 3.6.4, the build script has changed
>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:00:13AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> I've got a package where I need to pass an argument to setup.py as part of
> the build process. Is there a way to do this with dh_python2, ie, without
> using overrides?
dh_python2 doesn't call setup.py, the build system
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:21:16AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> > > I've got a package where I need to pass an argument to setup.py as part of
> > > the build process. Is there a way to do this with dh_python2, ie, without
> > > using overrides?
> > dh_python2 doesn't call setup.py, the build
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:23:21PM +, Weatherby,Gerard wrote:
> My test debian/postinst is:
Debhelper config files without the subpackage package name apply to the
first subpackage and not to all subpackages as you apparently think.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 09:13:30PM +0200, Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> I am a python developer and from time-to-time I also build some
> packages. I recently re-built python-rfoo for the latest version and I
> was suggest to make the packaging on salsa. Does the Debian-Python
> community have
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:17:31PM +0200, Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> > Salsa is only for official Debian packages. Are you going to update
> > python-rfoo in Debian?
>
> Well, I created the version which is in debian for a few years and yes,
> I would like to update it (with migration to python3,
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 04:39:44PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> The question is: if I drop Python2 support, what happens with the
> >> package names? Should I simply provide the python3-debianbts and
> >> drop python-debianbts, or shall I attempt some kind of migration
> >> to make the
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:09:22AM +, MARIE Alexandre wrote:
> override_dh_installdocs:
> ln -s /usr/share/javascript/mathjax/MathJax.js
> $(CURDIR)/doc/build/html/_static/MathJax.js
> find doc/build/html -name "*.html" -exec sed -i
>
Telling us the commands you used to get to this stage would be helpful, I
think. Right now it's only clear that the listed files are different in
the upstream and in the master branches, but dgit already told you that.
Also, what is the package name? "apt search xrayutilities" returns nothing
for
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 02:15:43PM +, MARIE Alexandre wrote:
> Sorry, my mistake, the name of the package is python-xrayutilities !*
No such package in Debian either (and if it existed, my apt search command
would return it).
There is only an old RFP #723017.
This is not related to the topic
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 03:20:24PM +, MARIE Alexandre wrote:
> gbp:error: Automatic merge failed.
You need to find why there are conflicts and fix them. Good first steps
are running gbp with --no-rollback and/or finding what upstream files are
modified in the master branch in the current
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 09:43:19PM +, llu...@autistici.org wrote:
> I changed the strategy to git revert and now I am able to build the package
> with the following commands:
>
> gbp clone g...@salsa.debian.org:python-team/applications/visualequation.git
> cd visualequation/
> uscan
> git
I have no idea about gbp-pq but I guess resetting just master is not
enough to fix that repo.
Please also note that force pushes are bad and deleting tags in published
repos doesn't really work so please don't do that, especially when the
problem is mainly with the unpublished pq branch and some
Both your patches look very wrong. How did you make them? The patch
patching debian/changelog looks especially wrong.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 07:16:01AM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> it would be nice, if the python2 packages could be skipped in bulleye but not
> for backports in buster.
>
> Is it something which could be envision ?
Not in the main backports, maybe in -sloppy. And it will be hard or
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:16:28AM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> While tidying up some packages before taking some time off I realized
> that some packages like django-tables had binary packages that took
> the convention of creating -doc packages using -doc (a
> very long time ago).
>
> The
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:05:33AM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote:
> > Yes, this is the third email on this in the last month, previous two
> > didn't get any replies.
>
> Sorry I didn't mean to anger you or be disrespectful in any way. My
> apologies if I did.
I wasn't angered, the second of those
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 02:08:41PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> According to the daily graph I built here:
> http://py2graph.infomaniak.ch/py2.7.deps.svg
>
> we can work on Python 2 removal for the below packages. Note that I have
> *not* checked for reverse dependencies, please
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 01:35:35AM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> During DebConf19 we¹ have tried to figure out how to manage Python 2 and PyPy
> module removal from Debian and below is our proposal.
> After discussing it on this mailing list we plan to send an email to
> debian-devel@l.d.o with
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
No upstream releases since 2009.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-gpiv
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:38:33AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> One package that stood out from the rest was python-monotonic.
> python-monotonic is maintained by the Debian openstack team, but it doesn't
> seem to be in any way openstack specific, nor does upstream seem to have
> dropped
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
Looks like it doesn't work at all in the current state.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rn python-uniconvertor
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
The latest upstream code at https://github.com/pearu/pyvtk seems to
support Python 3, but the Debian package contains code from 2007.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-pyvtk
--
WBR,
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
No upstream releases since the last packaged one in 2012.
python3-xcffib description says "This package is intended to be a (mostly)
drop-in replacement for xpyb. xpyb has an inactive upstream,
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
Last release in 2009.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-excelerator
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
Last release in 2003.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-jabber
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
Upstream Python 3 bugreport:
https://bitbucket.org/blais/optcomplete/issues/2/python3-compatibility
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-optcomplete
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
There is some Py3 fork at https://github.com/tynn/PyAO
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rn pyao
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
I couldn't find if the upstream source supports Python 3.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-libavg
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
Native package by a retired DD. Homepage gives 404. Last release in 2012.
Popcon 8.
Depends on several py2 packages.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb rebuildd
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
From the O bug (#906195): "If it is still RC buggy at the time of the
freeze, I'll ask for its removal from Debian."
The only reverse dep is python-googlecloudapis which has other problems
and isn't
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
http://www.nullcube.com/software/pygdchart2.html (from the O bug) is dead.
No new releases in Debian since initial packaging in 2005.
The only reverse dep is rebuildd for which an RM bug was just
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
Source in Debian was first packaged in 1999.
Depends on cruft python-imaging.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-htmlgen
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
Depends and build-depends on python3-protorpc-standalone which is not
installable on Python 3.7, and on python-oauth2client which is dropped
from Debian.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rn
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
Control: block -1 by 935073
Control: block -1 by 911171
According to #884616 (RC bug on python-visual) and #911171 (RC bug on
epigrass) it's broken and should not be used. Its only reverse dep is
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
No upstream releases since 2008.
Popcon is 17.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-unipath
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
https://github.com/piranha/opster/ supports Python 3.
Popcon is 14.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-opster
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertag: py2removal
Latest upstream code supports Python 3. There is a Python 3 request bug,
#737790, 5.5 years old.
Popcon is 34.
Reverse deps checked with dak rm -Rnb python-xmlrunner
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
