Any Project Admins for python-modules on Alioth around?
I sent a request to join on Alioth some time ago but it hasn't been approved.
My username on Alioth is 'ginggs-guest'.
I'd like to do some QA work on python-messaging , orphaned in bug #787110.
Python-messaging's VCS is already on
Try the following in debian/rules:
export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all,-pie
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 18:01, Scott Talbert wrote:
> However, there's one package that seems like it is going to cause a
> problem. I uploaded pytest-xdist 1.29.0-1, which *requires* pytest 4, so
> pytest-xdist won't migrate to testing until pytest 4 does. On the other
> hand, pytest 4
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 19:28, Scott Talbert wrote:
> Thanks. As an aside, what does the tilde at the end of the version number
> mean? I have seen that in control files before, but I've been unable to
> find anything in the documentation about it.
The tilde is to accommodate backports.
On Sat, 16 Nov 2019 at 16:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Its not about testing. Its the usual build time test. If I'd do a
> source upload of this package it will FTBFS under the current state
> of the archive.
If you look on the numpy tracker page , you'll see there is a note:
On Sun, 1 Dec 2019 at 20:36, Andreas Tille wrote:
> according to the answer to an issue I opened agains scikit-bio the
> test suite would work with scipy version 1.3.1. I wonder what might be
> the reason to stick to version 1.2.2 instaed of upgrading to the version
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 at 06:41, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I've gone through and statused the issues currently listed on the package
> tracker for python3-defaults migration that are autopkgtest related . I
> stuffed it into a pastebin .
Thanks for your work on this!
I filed bug
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020 at 10:54, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> src:monster-masher has no build dependencies on python2, the only
> binary package it builds (monster-masher) has no runtime dependencies
> on python2, and this package has no autopkgtests. There's actually not
> a single line of
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 02:19, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> So: let's just make that automatic? Thoughts?
+1 from me.
Apparently, all that's required is to give @janitor-bot commit
access to the repositories.
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 08:04, Diane Trout wrote:
> Does Mo Zhou want to review the commits to numba? Or should I push them
> to the main numba packaging repository? (I'm in the python, science,
> and med teams)
Numba is orphaned, see #935626, so I think go ahead and adopt the
Mail list logo