Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Josselin Mouette, 21.03.2007] * the deprecation of the current keyword; current keyword is deprecated? Why? I'm using it a lot and I like it... -- -=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpeuiDfwvZtU.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Pierre Habouzit, 21.03.2007] On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 08:28:47PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: current keyword is deprecated? Why? I'm using it a lot and I like it... What are you using it for exactly ? I mean, please give an example, with an actual package, that would be okay. Because

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Pierre Habouzit, 21.03.2007] On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:25:52PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: it's useful for Python applications that need specific Python version. f.e. if current Python version is 2.4 and my app. will work only with python2.5 and above, I can Build-depend on python

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Steve Langasek, 21.03.2007] So with current deprecated, what is the solution for a package which wants to build a single binary extension for the current python version in a package named python-foo, with no support for other versions of python returned by pyversions -s? I think depending on

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Steve Langasek, 21.03.2007] On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:59:40PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: I think depending on python-dev for current only modules/apps and python-all-dev for the rest should be enough (if both systems will recognize it correctly, I mean also: python-dev(=2.5)|python2.5

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Pierre Habouzit, 22.03.2007] On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:23:59AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: [Steve Langasek, 21.03.2007] On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 10:59:40PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: I think depending on python-dev for current only modules/apps and python-all-dev for the rest

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Tristan Seligmann, 22.03.2007] * Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-03-21 21:49:00 +0100]: On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:25:52PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: it's useful for Python applications that need specific Python version. f.e. if current Python version is 2.4 and my app

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Pierre Habouzit, 22.03.2007] On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:13:40PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: [Josselin Mouette, 22.03.2007] Le jeudi 22 mars 2007 à 19:56 +0100, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : Just nitpicking: the dh_ tool doesn't need to know that, as it can guess it from what

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Steve Langasek, 23.03.2007] On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:58:18AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: - relying on Build-Depends to indicate whether a package builds current or all doesn't seem to leave a way to differentiate between packages that follow the new policy and really

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Pierre Habouzit, 23.03.2007] current in X?-P-V sucks a lot because X?-P-V explains which python version the package supports, whereas current is not about that but about the kind of packaging ways it has. This information should never have been folded in the same field, I only recently got

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Steve Langasek, 24.03.2007] On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:39:45AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: I couldn't set python in hashbang (as I said before: gaupol will not work with python2.3). Package was build when python2.3 was default so hashbang was set to python2.4. Now when python2.3

Re: Proposed update to the python policy

[Josselin Mouette, 28.03.2007] While the discussion is still ongoing about the current keyword, it seems that everyone agrees with the other changes which are only loosely related. Can we proceed with these, until we agree on how current should be replaced? IMHO, yes -- -=[ Piotr

Re: PMPT membership

I'm the current maintainer for the python-scapy debian package. I want to join the Python Molules Packaging Team to maintain this and others future python related packages. I want to use the subversion repo for the debian files too. I see two accounts in Alioth for David Villa: dvilla-guest

Re: PMPT membership

[David Villa, 11.04.2007] Oh, I forgot to give you my Alioth login. Sorry for that. My login is davidvilla-guest. thank you. You have been added. Welcome! -- :wq! pgplYDTrSIVs2.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: PMPT membership

let me cite alioth's gforge: User Added Successfully Welcome Ondrej :-) PS OK, OK, I will also mention that I can add new members to the team next time I ask someone to consider joining DPMT... -- -=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpyLxWr2VuAB.pgp Description:

Re: Python modules team membership request

I would like to be added to the team. I intend to maintain my package pubtal within the team, and help out with general QA work. My alioth login is rodrigogc-guest You have been added. Welcome! :-) -- -=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpUodzuYufP5.pgp

Re: packages using python-support and renaming egg-info directories will FTBFS

[Gustavo Noronha Silva, 12.05.2007] Beware when updating your packages! Below you'll find a dd-list -i of packages containing .egg-info in the name in a directory or file, and also depending on python-support generated by me and POX. packages already updated: myghtyutils, nose, kid, pylons,

Re: Joining the team

Hi! I would like to join the team so I can maintain my packages within the team as well as help out with maintainance of Debian python-related packages. I currently maintain python-pmock, and have two python-related [1] packages needing sponsorship at mentors.debian.net (related to two

Re: new upstream versions of DPMT's packages

[Bernd Zeimetz, 24.06.2007] Hi, uscan detected some new upstream versions of packages maintained within the team (see below). My question is: how can I help you with uploading these new versions into Debian? If there are any problems, please ask on the mailing list or on #debian-python

new upstream versions of DPMT's packages

Hi, uscan detected some new upstream versions of packages maintained within the team (see below). My question is: how can I help you with uploading these new versions into Debian? If there are any problems, please ask on the mailing list or on #debian-python channel. Processing watchfile line

Re: Joining the team

I'd like to maintain python-feedparser (and some other packages in a near future) within the team. You're in. Welcome in the group :-) -- -=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgp3TYlFCsvxK.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: new upstream versions of DPMT's packages

[Jonas Meurer, 25.06.2007] On 24/06/2007 Piotr Ożarowski wrote: Processing watchfile line for package python-mysqldb... Newest version on remote site is 1.2.2c1, local version is 1.2.2 python-mysqldb: Newer version (1.2.2c1) available on remote site: ftp://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/m

Re: Making all DD members of the team by default

[Raphael Hertzog, 26.07.2007] I believe the perl and python team would benefit from using similar ACL so that any DD who wishes to integrate his packages in the team can do so without requesting access that we'll grant him anyway. We expect DD to be educated and to ask before messing up if

Re: RFS: feedparser (updated package)

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1-9 of feedparser package. uploaded -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor.txt pgpl2QvSJ5rSc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Making all DD members of the team by default

[Gustavo Franco, 05.08.2007] Piotr, would you mind update our dpmt policy, please? If you're busy with other stuff ping me. :-) I'm not really a good doc writer, but my changes are in SVN already. Please fix them ;-P -- -=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=-

Re: ITS: tftpy

I am looking for a sponsor for my package tftpy. see my tiny change in SVN, if you're OK with it, I'll upload -- -=[ Piotr Ozarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpvSXbgGBLPG.pgp Description: PGP signature

Join the Python Applications Packaging Team

Hi, Do you need help with your Python application package but DPMT guys don't want to inject it in their repo because it's not a module? Do you have problems with finding sponsor due to this new nasty Debian Python Policy? I have something for you: new, shiny: *Python Applications Packaging

Re: Joining the PATP

Hi Julien I created an initial packaging for screenlets, a python program to display tiny stuffs on the desktop. I'm quite new in the world of packaging so my work is far from perfect, and I have some difficulties to find a sponsor for previous works I done. So, someone advise me to join

Re: RFS: python-pyglew + join team

Hi [Sandro Tosi, 23.10.2007] http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/debian/python-pyglew_0.1.2-1.dsc I will check it tomorrow if no one will be faster. [...] As soon as I'll find time, I'll inject (this and other python pkgs) into group's svn repository; in the meantime, I'd like to request to

Re: Joining the team and RFS python-avc

Hi Fabrizio I am looking for sponsorship for my new python module: python-avc, ITP http://bugs.debian.org/448646, mentors http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-avc. * remove Provides: ${python:Provides} - architecture independent packages don't need it * you've missed some

Re: Joining the team and RFS python-avc

Le lundi 05 novembre 2007 à 15:40 +0100, Piotr Ożarowski a écrit : Hi Fabrizio I am looking for sponsorship for my new python module: python-avc, ITP http://bugs.debian.org/448646, mentors http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-avc. * remove Provides

Re: Why still 2.4? How can I help you?

But Lenny and Sid are both still at Python level 2.4... If not now, then when? don't worry, Lenny will not have python2.4 as a default Python version (or it will be released with python2.4 over my dead body ;) How can you help? See this thread:

Re: RFS: feedparser (updated package)

[Carlos, 02.01.2008] I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1-11 of feedparser. my motherboard is working again, no need to mail @lists.d.o. anymore :) I will take care of it this evening. -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pycha packaging

Hi Vincent, I have packaged Pycha, a simple chart-drawing library using Cairo as backend. [...] Any feedback on the packaging is welcome. * Priority: extra - why not optional? * Build depend on python-support (= 0.6.4) or you will have some problems with Eggs * add python-setuptools (=

Re: Pycha packaging

[Bernd Zeimetz, 04.01.2008] Vincent Bernat wrote: I have uploaded to SVN using svn-inject -o. Because of the modified SOURCES.txt, I have now a not-so-clean SVN tree. Should I leave as is or should I remove SOURCES.txt from trunk and branches? please remove it and add a patch using

Re: python-modules team membership request

Cześć Jakub, I'm the author of the pipeline[1] module. Please add a full copy of GPL licence inside the upstream tarball, we cannot distribute it without it. Removing debian dir would make our lives a little bit easier as well... :-) I'd like to join the python-modules team in order to

Re: Pycha packaging

[Vincent Bernat, 04.01.2008] I have removed it. I will upload this to SVN shortly and will ask you for upload when the description review by debian-l10n-english is complete. ping me via private mail or on IRC (#debian-python, OFTC network, nickname: POX) you're added, welcome in

Re: RFS: pondus

Hi Eike, [Eike Nicklas, 2008-02-04T17:51] It would be great if you had a look at the package, provided some feedback on the packaging and eventually sponsored the package once it is packaged properly. * you've missed python-gobject (src/pondus/gui/dialog_add.py, line 23), but since

Re: RFS: pondus

Hi, [Eike Nicklas, 2008-02-05T17:44] Thanks for the hint, I will add the dependency on the next upload (or I can reupload, if you prefer that). no need to upload it anywhere anymore, just inject it into the repo (please remember about svn-inject's -o option [1]) and ping me. * how about

Re: I want to join the Python Modules Packaging Team

Jan, you're a new team member. Welcome :) Please add DPMT [1] to Uploaders or Maintainer field, add these two fields to debian/control (in source stanza): Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/python-modules/packages/migrate/trunk Vcs-Browser:

to DDs: sponsors needed in DPMT and PAPT

Hi, We need more sponsors in Debian Python Modules Team and Python Modules Packaging Team. If you have few free hours, please take a look at our TODO pages [1,2] and put your name in DD column if you're willing to work on a package with our non-DD member (and remove row once package is uploaded).

Re: On team maintainership of DPMT (PAPT) packages

Hi, [Sandro Tosi, 2008-03-09] I'd like to report here my feelings about the current way to maintain package in our repositories (DPMT and PAPT). my turn. How I understand the team relationship: [0] * if DPMT/PAPT is in our repo. (no matter where the team name is, in Maintainer or in

Re: On team maintainership of DPMT (PAPT) packages

[Piotr Ożarowski, 2008-03-09] * if DPMT/PAPT is in our repo. (no matter where the team name is, in s,DPMT/PAPT,package sorry pgpN28nSzs0aN.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: handling /usr/local/lib/python2.x/site-packages in sys.path

[Matthias Klose, 2008-03-11] - add another path (e.g. /usr/local/python/lib2.x/site-packages), and remove the /usr/local/lib/python2.x/site-packages path after the next release. Does provide an upgrade path, but doesn't solve the probem immediately. I would choose this option or

Re: handling /usr/local/lib/python2.x/site-packages in sys.path

[Sebastian Rittau, 2008-03-11] On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:58:56PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: I would choose this option or even remove /usr/local/* from sys.path completely. If one wants to play with unsupported Python modules or Eggs, he should sys.path.append(his_path) by hand, IMHO

Re: Request: mother

Hi Antonio, [Antonio De Luci, 2008-03-24] I would like to be added to Team DMTP. I intend to keep the mother's package on DPMT. You're a new team member, welcome! BTW: you will need to list some good advantages over SQLAlchemy to get it sponsored by me (python-sqlalchemy maintainer :-) --

Re: Would like to join the PMPT

-- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpN3mbsyrOZq.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bugs that'll block python 2.5

[Raphael Hertzog, 2008-04-15 09:31] On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: Finally, and quite importantly, there is what to do with modules that have been added to the standard library in 2.5 (ctypes, celementtree, wgsiref). These use either pycentral or pysupport, and since they mark

Re: Bugs that'll block python 2.5

[Josselin Mouette, 2008-04-15 12:32] On lun, 2008-04-14 at 22:57 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: Finally, and quite importantly, there is what to do with modules that have been added to the standard library in 2.5 (ctypes, celementtree, wgsiref). These use either pycentral or pysupport, and

Re: RFS: mutagen (1.14-1)

[Tristan Seligmann, 2008-06-03] http://mithrandi.net/debian/pool/main/m/mutagen/mutagen_1.14-1.dsc uploaded -- http://people.debian.org/~piotr/sponsor.txt pgpqV9oLTfQy3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Namespace and packaging

: http://dl.share-spirit.net/aditam.core-0.1.tar.gz please point us to .dsc file next time, it's easier to download all the files with dget. -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgp78ZynJSLgP.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Joining the team with new packages: rope and ropemacs

[David Spreen, 2008-07-30] I am interested in joining the python-modules team with two new netzwurm user added, welcome Any feedback on the packages is appreciated. * debian/docs - README.txt is listed twice (in both packages) * rope-0.8.4: python-svn and mercurial packages are missing in

Re: New versions of packages with DPMT in Uploaders field

[David Spreen, 2008-08-08 00:52] What's the policy for new versions of packages that have DPMT in the Uploaders field instead of the Maintainers field? see this[1] thread, my opinion is here[2] Is it okay for team members to upload new versions to the SVN or is that discouraged? update it

Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)

[Y Giridhar Appaji Nag, 2008-08-15] I am looking for sponsors for my sclapp and pytagsfs packages. What about your previous sponsor (who-uploads reports the same person for both packages)? Is he busy? If yes, ping me in private, I will check and upload it (if everything is ok). --

Re: RFS: sclapp and pytagsfs (updated packages)

both packages uploaded and tagged (I fixed lintian warning in sclapp before uploading) [Alexander Reichle-Schmehl, 2008-08-18] Yes, I am busy. Sorry :( no problem; some of my sponsorees are asking on various mailing lists for sponsoring packages I uploaded once without even trying to reach me

Re: request to join debian python teams

Hi Serafeim, [Serafeim Zanikolas, 2008-08-20] I'd like to join the python modules and apps teams to help with general QA. I've added you to both teams, welcome :-) -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpzvprMBvBtR.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: json-py (updated package)

[Daniel Watkins, 2008-08-21] I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.4-4 of my package json-py. uploaded. Please contact release managers about unblocking it (note that -3 didn't propagate to testing) -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl

Re: RFS: json-py (updated package)

2008/8/22 Daniel Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:27:32 +0200 Piotr Ożarowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: uploaded. Please contact release managers about unblocking it (note that -3 didn't propagate to testing) Thanks for your sponsorship (once again). I'm not totally convinced

Re: [Python-modules-commits] r6316 - in packages/python-feedvalidator/trunk/debian (watch)

2008/8/27 Carlos [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 9:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Added: packages/python-feedvalidator/trunk/debian/watch === [...] +version=3 +http://code.google.com/p/feedparser/downloads/list

Re: RFS: gwibber

[I just took a quick look at the package, I'm still on VAC] [Daniel Watkins, 2008-09-02 23:08] I am looking for a sponsor for my package gwibber. PAPT is in Uploaders so you can add the package to our TODO list[1] and/or ping us on #debian-python from homepage: | Please note that this is

Re: status of python2.6

[Ondrej Certik, 2008-10-03 11:41] is there anyone packaging python2.6? Any plans for it? I'm sure Matthias will upload python2.6 to unstable short after releasing Lenny. For now Lenny has the highest priority. (i.e. if you want python2.6 in Debian - fix some RC bugs :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: status of python2.6

[Ondrej Certik, 2008-10-03 12:44] When will Lenny be released? When the number of RC bugs goes to 0? mostly, yes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian lenny update : nxutils.so: undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0

[oc-spam66, 2008-10-08 11:55] I went back to the former python-matplotlib package (0.98.1-1) and could import pylab again. So I think there is a problem with python-matplotlib 0.98.1-1+lenny1.1 could you please try unstable one? (0.98.3-3) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: python-uniconvertor breaks help(modules) in python

FYI: python-uniconvertor 1.1.2-2 uploaded to testing-proposed-updates pgphpKtnUTWxI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Joining the PMPT, got a package to add

[Vernon Tang, 2008-12-17] I've got a Python module package to add (python-pytc, ITP #508822) and would like to have it maintained within the PMPT, so I'd like to join. You're a new Python Modules Packaging Team (aka Debian Python Modules Team) member. Welcome on board :-) -- -=[ Piotr

Re: ITP: Name for real python-pgsql module

[Paweł Tęcza, 2008-12-18 10:49] I'm not DD, but I would like to make Debian package with python-pgsql module [1]. I need it for PostgreSQL support for Courier-Pythonfilter framework [2]. It has been debianized by Frederik Dannemare [3] and still waits for sponsoring at mentors.d.n site

Re: [Python-modules-team] ITP: python-pivy -- Coin binding for Python

sources, make sure Debian's one is used Pleas note that I didn't build it as libsoqt4-dev's required version is still not available, any progres on this one? [1] see jinja2 package for an example -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgp4ClGVPnLnm.pgp Description

Re: RFS: python-pytc

package without CDBS, IMHO * add Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser fields * did you send patches upstream? -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgp9QwhG1IVyY.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [RFR] urlwatch

[Adeodato Simó, 2008-12-18] * Piotr Ożarowski [Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:06:35 +0100]: You can even install it as /usr/share/urlwatch/urlwatch.py (but still symlink it without the extension) - this way you'll have additional .pyc file which will speed urlwatch a little bit AFAIK, .pyc files

Re: [RFR] urlwatch

[Adeodato Simó, 2008-12-18] Yes, I got that. You mean: /usr/bin/urlwatch - /usr/share/urlwatch/urlwatch.py But even with that, strace does not show that a /usr/share/urlwatch/urlwatch.pyc file would get used when invoking urlwatch. oh, right, thanks -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski

Re: numpy 1.2.1, switching to git?

[Piotr Ożarowski, 2008-12-23 13:37] unfortunately I use Git only outside Debian, so I don't know about issues git-buildpackage might have. I know it doesn't have mergeWithUpstream but it's written in Python, so we can implement this. The problem is (FWIK) that it's better to use Git

Re: Python 3.0 ?

[andmalc, 2008-12-27 23:00] I'd appreciate a package, if only to play with and not for production. $ dget -x https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/python3.0/3.0-0ubuntu1/+files/python3.0_3.0-0ubuntu1.dsc $ cd python* $ debuild -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: mercurial 1.1.2

/changelog * in debian/control: s/Description: Scalable/Description: scalable * could you add comments to patches? * why not use trunk (IMHO there's no need to use new branch) -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpc6NjThzKJp.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Python-webpy: unnecessary Recommends?

[Andrew Malcolmson, 2009-01-08] I am installing Pylons in Aptitude and noticed that MySQL is one of the automatic dependencies to be installed. It appears that the responsible package is python-webpy which recommends python-mysqldb. python-mysqldb depends on libmysqlclient15off so it should

Re: Python-webpy: unnecessary Recommends?

I wrote: [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/python-modules-team/2009-January/thread.html oops, it was sent to debian-python@lists.debian.org, so this is the right link: http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2009/01/msg00013.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Python-webpy: unnecessary Recommends?

BTW: I'm also not sure why Pylons depends on webpy. Webpy isn't mentioned in the Pylons Install Guide python-pylons does not depend on python-webpy looks like python-flup (which is in python-pastescript's Recommends, PasteScript is one of Pylons' dependncies) recommends python-webpy and

Re: mercurial 1.1.2-2

[Vernon Tang, 2009-01-18] Could you please upload mercurial 1.1.2-2 from papt svn to close a serious bug? uploaded -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgp6rbZP9qndI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: please test the numpy package

[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25] There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on sphinx-0.5, which is currently only in experimental. And also upstream doesn't have it in the tarball. I originally fixed that by adding a new target into debian/rules, that downloaded the upstream tgz,

Re: unstable semi-frozen (was: please test the numpy package)

) -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpDWuDrQdsoB.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: please test the numpy package

. if you will help me convince release managers to unblock it, I will upload 0.5 to unstable (if Mikhail will not protest). -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpJ8JereMtfS.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: please test the numpy package

[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25] On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote: if you will help me convince release managers to unblock it, I will upload 0.5 to unstable (if Mikhail will not protest). So release managers are blocking any uploads of sphinx to unstable

Re: please test the numpy package

packages has RC-bugs, Are you sure? It doesn't have reported RC bugs, yes ;-P hence no reason to allow for a transition to testing. Moreover, I promise that pymvpa will not attempt such thing ;-) What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it? -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski

Sphinx (was: Re: please test the numpy package)

[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26] On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:47:02AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it? Sphinx 0.4.3 is the classic example: It causes more trouble than it fixed. For example try building pymvpa's docs

Re: RFS: python-libasyncns

it) * if 'import libasyncns' is not how you import the module, you have to change the binary package name * consider building docs (ship it in -doc package if they're big) * short description is too long (lintian will warn you about it) -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl

Re: RFS: rednotebook (NEW)

[Jonathan Wiltshire, 2009-01-04] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rednotebook/rednotebook_0.4.0-1.dsc I used http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rednotebook/rednotebook_0.4.1-1.dsc * pyversions contains 2.5, why not 2.5-? * it's Python app. - consider installing it to

Re: [RFR] Courier-Pythonfilter

. Update: Frederik has just uploaded his Debian source package with version 1.5 at mentors.d.n site :) Please point me to .dsc file, I cannot find it on mentors.d.n. BTW, what does RFR stand for? Ready for Release? -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl

Re: [RFR] Courier-Pythonfilter

[Piotr Ożarowski, 2009-01-28] Please point me to .dsc file, I cannot find it on mentors.d.n. found it :-) http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/courier-pythonfilter/courier-pythonfilter_1.5-1.dsc -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpr31wUfB9hh.pgp

Re: [RFR] Courier-Pythonfilter

[please CC me or debian-pyt...@l.d.o as I didn't subscribe this bug] * 1.6 is mentioned in bug #504080, is .dsc available somewhere? * it's Architecture: all package, not any, or did I miss something? * please merge patches 01-31 into one file * s/Debian packaging is (C)/Debian packaging is © *

Re: RFS: python-libasyncns

[Yann Leboulanger, 2009-01-28] * consider building docs (ship it in -doc package if they're big) Any example package where I could look for the way to do that? use `make doc` to build them and put doc/* into debian/python-libasyncns-doc.docs example package? jinja2 -- -=[ Piotr

Re: RFS: rednotebook (NEW)

name is the same as module name | mv $(CURDIR)/debian/rednotebook/usr/bin/rednotebook \ | $(CURDIR)/debian/rednotebook/usr/share/rednotebook/run.py | dh_link /usr/share/rednotebook/run.py /usr/bin/rednotebook -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl

Re: RFS: rednotebook (NEW)

[Jonathan Wiltshire, 2009-02-03] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rednotebook/rednotebook_0.5.3-1.dsc `dh install --remaining` invokes dh_auto_install which is installing files into old location. Please fix it. You can reply me off-list once it's done, I'll upload the package. PS

Re: Request for review - Charm 1.9.1

[Christopher Lunsford, 2009-02-05] - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/charm/charm_1.9.1-1.dsc * PAPT is in Maintainer field, join PAPT and inject the package into our repo * python-feedparser is missing in Recommends (Depends?) * add ${misc:Depends} to Depends * no need to build

Re: Presentation and some questions/remarks about numpy/scipy packages

that you'll have commit rights. If you IRC, you can find us on #debian-python @ OFTC [1] http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/python-modules-policy.html -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpMVtpJS2oE7.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: A first patch for python-numpy to avoid build conflicts against atlas

only here[1]. [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/pts.cgi?what=advancedpackage=python-numpyemail=y...@email.tld -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpN4AWrUNyn7.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Python related changes for unstable/squeeze

that depend on it (Python applications mostly) should use private directories and thus not pollute the global namespace (we should add this to the Python policy, IMO) -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgpyAgDLs28RO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Python related changes for unstable/squeeze

[Matthias Klose, 2009-02-16] Piotr Ożarowski schrieb: - 2.5 is superseded by 2.6; currently there doesn't seem to be a reason to ship 2.5 and modules for 2.5 with the next stable release. The upstream 2.5 maintainance branch doesn't see bug fixes anymore, only security releases

Re: Python related changes for unstable/squeeze

[Piotr Ożarowski, 2009-02-18] that's exactly what I meant, /usr/lib/py{3,}shared will be equivalent of /usr/share/py{,3}shared but for Python extensions, sorry if I sounded differently and by that I mean /usr/lib/py{3,}shared/python2.5, /usr/lib/py{3,}shared/python2.6 and so on (including .py

Re: ITP: skype4py -- Skype API wrapper for Python

[Rafael Laboissiere, 2009-02-18] I just filed a request to join the DPMT at Alioth, but I am not sure it is enough. Please, add me (alioth login: rafael) to the team. I will add you to the team this evening, you have commit rights already as you're a DD. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Request for review - Charm 1.9.1

FTR: this package is already uploaded (after few more changes) pgpB2DeZbw0HL.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Python related changes for unstable/squeeze

Yes, I know that if everything will work out my way, decision about my preferred tool will be irrelevant -- -=[ Piotr Ożarowski ]=- -=[ http://www.ozarowski.pl ]=- pgp4H4H08RF03.pgp Description: PGP signature

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >