Hi !
I would like some comment on a very simple package that I just made.
* Package name: pyvnc2swf
Version : 0.9.3-1
Upstream Author : Yusuke Shinyama
* URL : http://www.unixuser.org/~euske/vnc2swf/
* License : GPLv2
Section : graphics
It builds
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 21:11:40 +0200, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a talk with POX (fellow developer) who reminded me that the
package might not be suited too well for the Python modules team yet.
It doesn't provide any public modules and since it's a *modules* team.
:)
Yes,
Hi !
nevow seems not maintained any more. Its maintainer, Tommi Virtanen,
seems MIA. I have tried to contact him during last month without
luck. Almost all his packages have been NMUed:
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to hijack nevow since I am using it
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 03 septembre 2007, vers 22:23,
je disais:
I would like to hijack nevow since I am using it everyday. I have
packaged the new upstream version.
In fact, it is orphaned. I have done an ITA on it. Therefore, I am still
seeking a sponsor for it. :)
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 04 janvier 2008, vers 00:11,
Piotr Ożarowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
I have packaged Pycha, a simple chart-drawing library using Cairo as
backend.
[...]
Any feedback on the packaging is welcome.
* Priority: extra - why not optional?
Well, I
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du vendredi 04 janvier 2008, vers 00:56, je
disais:
* add python-setuptools (= 0.6b3-1) to Build-Depends
lintian asked me to add it to Build-Depends-Indep unless it was
necessary for clean. Since python setup.py clean is called on clean
target, I have
On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:29:11 +0100, Piotr Ożarowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have uploaded to SVN using svn-inject -o. Because of the
modified
SOURCES.txt, I have now a not-so-clean SVN tree. Should I leave as is
or
should I remove SOURCES.txt from trunk and branches?
please remove
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du vendredi 04 janvier 2008, vers 16:10,
Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
The file exists in the upstream tarball, so I cannot remove it.
sure, you can. Just delete it in the clean target.
You are right, it worked without any problem. I feared that
OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 02:06,
Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
The only way I can see to fix this is to move one of those commands so
the corrent ordering is achieved in the postinst. Where should I be
moving the rules around to? Should
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 18:17:34 +1100, Ben Finney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Vincent, please don't send me copies of messages sent to this list.
This is spelled out on the mailing-list code of conduct
URL:http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct.)
Sorry for that.
See:
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 12:50,
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Le lundi 07 janvier 2008 à 07:56 +0100, Vincent Bernat a écrit :
Well, if you can change the order for postinst, you will get wrong order
in prerm.
debhelper (5.0.44
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 18:52, je
disais:
I have just tested and #386970 is still present with py_support at
least. In postinst, I have first the snippet by dh_installinit and then
the snippet by dh_pysupport. In prerm, I have exactly the same
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 22:12,
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
debhelper (5.0.44) unstable; urgency=low
* prerm and postrm scripts are now generated in a reverse
order than preinst and postinst scripts. For example, if
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 07 janvier 2008, vers 22:38,
je disais:
And we use cdbs :
- depends on debhelper (= 5.0.44)
- set debian/compat to 6
- add a lintian override for this
- add this in debian/rules to disallow first run of dh_installinit to
modify
OoO En ce début de soirée du vendredi 04 janvier 2008, vers 21:07, Piotr
Ożarowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
May I also add nevow to the list of team-maintained packages?
http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nevow.html
it's a Python module, you're a team member - I don't see a reason why you
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du mardi 08 janvier 2008, vers 10:34, Ben
Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
- set debian/compat to 6
- add a lintian override for this
I get no error from 'lintian' for this.
Try with -vIi.
Rather, an error from 'linda':
E: gracie; DH_COMPAT is greater
OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du mercredi 16 janvier 2008, vers
02:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
* For specifying supported Python versions, the policy recommends using
XS/B-Python, whereas the python-support documentation recommends
debian/pyversions. Which
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du samedi 26 janvier 2008, vers 00:51, Bernd
Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
I attach a diff for this change using quilt. I have also upgraded the
package to the new 0.5.27. I have added myself to Uploaders. I have
tried to commit this but I get this
: debhelper (= 5), cdbs (= 0.4.43), python, python-support (= 0.4)
+Uploaders: Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tristan Seligmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), cdbs (= 0.4.43), python, python-support (= 0.4), quilt, patchutils (= 0.2.25)
Build
OoO Pendant le repas du vendredi 25 janvier 2008, vers 19:45, je disais:
I attach a diff for this change using quilt. I have also upgraded the
package to the new 0.5.27. I have added myself to Uploaders. I have
tried to commit this but I get this error:
svn: Commit failed (details
Hi!
I am now an official DD :)
Could someone with appropriate rights remove my account bernat-guest and
add bernat instead?
Thanks.
--
Use the good features of a language; avoid the bad ones.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du samedi 19 avril 2008, vers 16:05,
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Could someone with appropriate rights remove my account bernat-guest and
add bernat instead?
Already done by Piotr apparently.
Thanks.
--
BOFH excuse #193:
Did you pay the new
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 04 mai
2008, vers 23:38, Monty Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Hi Vincent,
Vincent Bernat wrote:
I have not looked at your package yet, but did you consider joining DPMT
to maintain this package (with you as maintainer
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du lundi 05 mai 2008, vers 22:44, Monty
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
You may want to add Homepage field to source stanza of debian/control
and a debian/watch file (this will help the use of svn-buildpackage
too).
Moreover, there should be a
OoO En ce début de soirée du mardi 13 mai 2008, vers 21:55, Clement
Lorteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package nautilus-clamscan.
* Package name: nautilus-clamscan
Version : 0.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Clement Lorteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 21:27, Clement
Lorteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait:
Thank you for the review. I followed your recommendations and uploaded
the new package to debian.mentors.net. See my comments below.
You can use test_files/* for
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du samedi 14 juin 2008, vers 14:33,
Clement Lorteau [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
I uploaded a new version that has a debian/watch file, per standards version
3.8.0: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nautilus-clamscan. Could
you have a look?
Seems
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du lundi 21 juillet 2008, vers
14:05, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
python-sclapp (0.5.2-1) - framework for Python command-line applications
* New upstream release
+ sclapp.txt is now licensed under GPLv2+
* Update
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du dimanche 03 août 2008, vers
13:02, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
I did declare a stronger dependency, but 0.7 onwards pytagsfs also
build-depends on sclapp and I don't know how I ignored this. I fixed this and
also updated
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du dimanche 24 août 2008, vers
11:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
Date: Sunday, August 24, 2008 @ 09:55:21
Author: piotr
Revision: 6347
add python-pkg-resources to Depends (recaptcha/__init__.py needs it)
Thanks for spotting it. However,
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du lundi 25 août 2008, vers 20:16, je
disais:
This path does not exist.This explains why the first import
fails. However, I don't have any clue why Python thinks that the path of
the module is /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/recaptcha
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du lundi 25 août 2008, vers 20:42, je
disais:
import sys,new,os; p = os.path.join(sys._getframe(1).f_locals['sitedir'],
*('recaptcha',)); ie = os.path.exists(os.path.join(p,'__init__.py')); m = not
ie and
OoO Peu avant le début de l'après-midi du mercredi 27 août 2008, vers
13:12, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
import sys,new,os; p = os.path.join(sys._getframe(1).f_locals['sitedir'],
*('recaptcha',)); ie = os.path.exists(os.path.join(p,'__init__.py')); m =
not ie and
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du mercredi 27 août 2008, vers 22:45,
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
Could you please test the python-support package at
http://malsain.org/~joss/debian/ to see whether it handles this case
correctly?
Yes, this works correctly with this
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du dimanche 24 août 2008, vers 05:13,
Daniel Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait :
It builds these binary packages:
python-configobj - a simple but powerful config file reader and writer
for Python
Hi Daniel!
It seems there is a missing
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mardi 17 février 2009, vers 17:09,
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org disait :
This is not a technical problem. The technical divergences can be solved
if consensus is reached about them or if a decision body (TC or GR)
forces them. This is purely a
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du mercredi 18 février
2009, vers 23:55, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org disait :
As such, it would be very nice if people maintaining various kinds of
Python packages could test building them with the new version and see
whether the resulting
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du lundi 23 février 2009, vers 10:12,
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org disait :
Do we need to upload a new version when there is a fix needed? In this
case, I suppose we should use python-support in unstable instead of the
one in experimental?
Yes, it is
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du lundi 02 mars 2009, vers 16:21,
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org disait :
I ask this because I have many packages that use unittests after the
build. I add /var/lib/python-support to PYTHONPATH and launch those
tests. Because the path has
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du lundi 02 mars 2009, vers 16:21,
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org disait :
I ask this because I have many packages that use unittests after the
build. I add /var/lib/python-support to PYTHONPATH and launch those
tests. Because the path has
OoO Pendant le repas du lundi 02 mars 2009, vers 19:44, je disais:
I use this snippet then (with cdbs):
ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
common-install-indep::
PYTHONPATH='debian/$(cdbs_curpkg)/$(cdbs_python_support_path)/' \
python tests/runner.py
OoO Pendant le repas du lundi 02 mars 2009, vers 19:57, je disais:
Which can be shorten to:
ifeq (,$(findstring nocheck,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
common-install-indep::
PYTHONPATH='debian/$(cdbs_curpkg)/$(cdbs_python_support_path)/' \
python tests/runner.py
endif
Which is
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du mercredi 18 mars 2009, vers 22:11,
ber...@users.alioth.debian.org disait :
Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 @ 21:11:23
Author: bernat
Revision: 7926
Add a patch to handle sqlite = 3.6.4. Closes: #520338. Older
databases need to be fixed by hand.
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du mercredi 18 mars 2009, vers 22:21,
je disais:
Date: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 @ 21:11:23
Author: bernat
Revision: 7926
Add a patch to handle sqlite = 3.6.4. Closes: #520338. Older
databases need to be fixed by hand.
The patch is not complete:
OoO En cette soirée bien amorcée du mercredi 18 mars 2009, vers 22:38,
Tristan Seligmann mithra...@mithrandi.net disait :
The patch is not complete: upgrading from old databases still fail.
Please don't upload a package based on this patch; it's highly likely
that the patch that will be
OoO En ce début de soirée du mardi 25 août 2009, vers 21:56, Carl Chenet
cha...@ohmytux.com disait :
If you need help for one of your packages, feel free to contact me :)
I have some difficulties with this bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533922
I just tagged it help.
--
OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du samedi 29 août 2009, vers 02:58,
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com disait :
If we are all Python developers to some degree and know about PEP 374
Decision presented in PEP 374 does not really apply to us:
- Windows support is unimportant
- Python
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 26 décembre 2009, vers 18:43,
deavid deavidsed...@gmail.com disait :
Make me know if I could do anything to help maintaining this package
in Debian.
I can offer comaintaine on this package if you wish. You will need to
register yourself on
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du samedi 09 janvier 2010, vers
14:58, Umang umang...@gmail.com disait :
pbuilder (or cowbuilder) should be enough (yes, you have to test it on
Debian, but you can use chroot env.)
I've unsuccessfully tried to build a base.tgz on three different days
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du dimanche 10 janvier 2010, vers 01:59,
Umang umang...@gmail.com disait :
What message error did you get?
This is the last part of the output from pbuilder. This doesn't happen
with DIST=lenny or DIST=etch
I: Configuring dpkg-dev...
I: Configuring
OoO En cette nuit striée d'éclairs du lundi 11 janvier 2010, vers 02:36,
Umang umang...@gmail.com disait :
It seems that debootstrap was not that successful. Try:
sudo mkdir sid
sudo debootstrap sid sid http://ftp.XX.debian.org
Then check that sid/usr/bin/apt-get exists.
Which version of
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du mercredi 25 novembre 2009, vers
11:49, Jakub Wilk uba...@users.sf.net disait :
Package: python-axiom
Version: 0.5.31-2
Severity: important
User: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6 ftbfs
Hello,
When rebuilt against
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 23 janvier 2010, vers 20:15,
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org disait :
as you probably know, python2.6 has recently been added to supported
Python version in unstable [1].
Why currently compiling a package which contains binary extensions only
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du dimanche 24 janvier 2010, vers 12:58,
Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org disait :
as you probably know, python2.6 has recently been added to supported
Python version in unstable [1].
Why currently compiling a package which contains binary extensions only
OoO Pendant le journal télévisé du samedi 27 février 2010, vers 20:19,
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org disait :
after some discussions on #debian-python, I'd like to propose
increasing severity of Python 2.6 related bugs [1] to serious.
Well, I disagree. Python 2.6 is not the default.
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 28 février 2010, vers 16:46,
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org disait :
It would be far easier to let Python 2.6 be the default, then file (or
upgrade) serious bugs and solve them in a week or two.
Yeah sure, let’s knowingly break dozens of
OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du dimanche 28 février 2010,
vers 15:29, je disais:
Well, I disagree. Python 2.6 is not the default. Packages are currently
built with Python 2.5 and do not fail to build in a current pbuilder. We
already had a bunch of bug reports about
OoO En ce milieu de nuit étoilée du dimanche 06 juin 2010, vers 04:43,
Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com disait :
A couple of weeks ago, Jakub Wilk noticed this issue and prepared both a DD
list of affected packages and the grep output that was used to detect
potentially affected
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 11 juillet
2010, vers 23:05, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org disait :
I'm working on package that uses CDBS
That's not a very good choice.
Why?
--
printk(VFS: Busy inodes after unmount.
Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mercredi 14 juillet 2010, vers 17:17,
Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de disait :
I'm working on package that uses CDBS
That's not a very good choice.
Why?
Because cdbs is an unmaintainable beast of Makefiles. I'm not sure who is
willing to keep the Python
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mercredi 28 juillet 2010, vers 17:04,
je disais:
Looks like the exaile[1] package is very out-of-date.
I use debian and program in python for years and I think its time
to me contribute somehow, and I would like to start with exaile.
I tried to contact the
OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du dimanche 22 août 2010, vers 09:44,
Paul Wise p...@debian.org disait :
I don't think this is a bug at all. I'd rather say it's an user error.
I disagree, stuff written in C or Perl doesn't crash when the locale
is not set properly and neither should stuff
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du dimanche 22 août
2010, vers 23:16, Floris Bruynooghe f...@devork.be disait :
Perl spits out a lot of annoying warnings when using a non existing
locale. And it does this for any perl script.
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du mardi 31 août 2010, vers 14:56,
Giacomo A. Catenazzi c...@debian.org disait :
I disagree, stuff written in C or Perl doesn't crash when the locale
is not set properly and neither should stuff written in Python.
hmm.
In C it is because the POSIX
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 21 novembre 2010, vers
16:37, Filippo Rusconi listes.rusc...@laposte.net disait :
OK, so I may test if the content of the PYTHONPATH variable is empty
the way below, so that I can set the path in differenciated manners :
~~
Hello and happy new year!
Do you know any Python module that the author states as being licensed
under Python license? Since Python license is stated as a contract
between the licensee and the PSF, I wonder how to put that in
debian/copyright.
My problem is in python-cerealizer:
Hi!
I am switching some packages to dh_python2. I am using CDBS. I don't
find much documentation on how to do the transition. Here is what I have
done:
1. Remove DEB_PYTHON_SYSTEM from debian/rules
2. Update Build-Depends:
cdbs (= 0.4.90),
python (= 2.6.5)
Is
OoO En cette matinée ensoleillée du lundi 21 février 2011, vers 09:29,
Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org disait :
Is there anything else?
There will be a quick guide for maintainers in dh_python2 manpage¹ after
next upload, see also this² wiki page.
[¹] http://deb.li/dhp2
[²]
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du mardi 22 février 2011, vers
11:51, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name disait :
Many Python modules ship unit tests which do not require module
instalation or user interaction and so can be run automatically during the
build time. They can be a very
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mardi 01 mars 2011, vers 00:53, Piotr
Ożarowski pi...@debian.org disait :
cdbs and dh doesn't support Python 3.X yet. I provided a patch for CDBS
but it was rejected, dunno why.
I suppose that this is bug #604721. Why do you say this was rejected? It
just
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du dimanche 06 mars 2011, vers
14:48, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org disait :
There was some discussions about switching from SVN to git. I don't
remember everything but a major blocker was that it is not possible to
checkout a subtree with git
Hi!
Could someone look at nevow in the repository. I have upgraded it to
use dh_python2 (from python-central). However, the Python-Version
field in the binary package did disappear, ${python:Breaks} is expanded
to nothing and I have a new lintian warning.
debian/control (partial):
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du mardi 08 mars 2011, vers 18:56, Jakub
Wilk jw...@debian.org disait :
Breaks: python2.3-nevow ( 0.7.0-1.1), python2.4-nevow ( 0.7.0-1.1),
${python:Breaks}
Apparently dh_python2 doesn't cope with Breaks spanning across
multiple physical lines. Yay for new and
it.
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://www.luffy.cx
Treat end of file conditions in a uniform manner.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger)
pgpRjE9vU8KHM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
this package team
maintained. Would that be preferred? My alioth login is
nikratio-guest.
I can sponsor you. Please join the team. Piotr, could you add Nikolaus
to the team?
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://www.luffy.cx
Don't patch bad code - rewrite it.
- The Elements
, +1 for
only one helper in Wheezy.
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://www.luffy.cx
Use self-identifying input. Allow defaults. Echo both on output.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger)
pgpNdPjRc9SRS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. Also ensure that you applied what
Jakub said in debian-mentors@.
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://www.luffy.cx
Use statement labels that mean something.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger)
pgpVh9VEtPxzN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the Sphinx 1.1 hits the archive.
When that has happened, it's just a matter of uncommenting one line in
debian/rules.
I was also a bit surprised that so many DD did agree to not rebuild the
documentation. I would prefer that the documentation is rebuilt. Why do
you need Sphinx 1.1?
--
Vincent Bernat
changesets:
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/changeset/de340a6098c7
https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/changeset/a8b0ef275438
I also added a sphinx wishlist bug to backport this feature (Bug
#630409).
OK to wait for Sphinx 1.1 (or for the resolution of bug #630409).
--
Vincent Bernat
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert d'encre ce jour du lundi 13 juin 2011,
vers 23:23, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org disait :
Ah, of course. This should be fixed as well now.
OK. Uploaded.
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://www.luffy.cx
Indent to show the logical structure of a program
a single line in debian/packagename.links to do that.
Don't you need to remove jquery.js from your package as well?
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://www.luffy.cx
Use free-form input when possible.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger)
pgpH48B6xGw7Q.pgp
Description: PGP
report on reportbug. ;)
It seems that it is the BTS which declares python as a dependency
package. Maybe this makes more sense for other packages. I still need
to find the list of deppkgs to check what kind of packages is here.
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im
Write clearly
Hi!
Is this page up-to-date?
http://wiki.debian.org/Python/DbgBuilds
Does dh_python2 handle this part itself now?
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im
Make input easy to proofread.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan Plauger)
pgpB8brVrfl7W.pgp
Description
(in ${python:Depends}) and install (keep only debug files).
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im
/*
* Should be panic but... (Why are BSD people panic obsessed ??)
*/
2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/ip_fw.c
pgpoIgYEalYER.pgp
Description: PGP signature
using echo.
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im
#if 0
2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/buffer.c
pgpRVc6ievHkE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
translators.
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im
printk(What? oldfid != cii-c_fid. Call 911.\n);
2.4.3 linux/fs/coda/cnode.c
pgpl3T22DPB16.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I could
add the appropriate bits to each clean target in debian/rules, it seems
better to fix the problem either in dh_python2 or in setuptools. Any
thoughts?
--
Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im
Don't just echo the code with comments - make every comment count
❦ 4 février 2013 20:00 CET, Örjan Persson ora...@fobie.net :
I don't have the time to maintain my packages anymore. I just wanted to
check with you guys first if you're interested in adopting the packages
before I RFA them. The packages are python-setproctitle[1],
python-greenlet[2] and
❦ 22 février 2013 16:12 CET, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org :
From a server in a data center in Seattle, it took me 90 seconds
to download the packaging sources of python-eventlet. Compare
this to the 4 seconds it takes me to clone python-warlock from
Alioth, upstream source included !!!
❦ 21 juillet 2013 09:47 CEST, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org :
Just to let you know about some good news regarding the deprecated
python helpers.
python-central has just been removed from unstable, as you can see in
[0]. The only package still using python-central is gozerbot-plugins
❦ 2 août 2013 16:36 CEST, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org :
Worse, it doesn't even try to parse Build-Depends. The relevant logic
appears to be:
if [ -f /usr/share/dh-python/dh_python2 ] \
grep -q dh-python ./debian/control 2/dev/null
then
exec /usr/share/dh-python/dh_python2 $@
❦ 2 août 2013 15:15 CEST, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org :
dh-python is already in unstable \o/
While upgrading some of my packages, I have switched to pybuild and this
works well. In the SVN, there is cerealizer and pycha.
However, about python2/python3 packages, I did also notice that I
❦ 24 septembre 2013 00:25 CEST, ber...@users.alioth.debian.org :
Date: Monday, September 23, 2013 @ 22:25:40
Author: bernat
Revision: 25933
Let ${pythonX:Depends} find the dependencies on its own.
Hi!
I have a little problem with python3:Depends. The dependency with
python3-crypto
❦ 24 septembre 2013 09:59 CEST, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org :
Date: Monday, September 23, 2013 @ 22:25:40
Author: bernat
Revision: 25933
Let ${pythonX:Depends} find the dependencies on its own.
Hi!
I have a little problem with python3:Depends. The dependency with
python3
❦ 24 septembre 2013 10:15 CEST, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org :
ups, looks like I forgot to install/usr/share/dh-python/dist/*_fallback
files. Will be fixed in next dh-python upload
for now, simply add python-crypto and python3-crypto to Build-Depends
and dh_python* will find the right
❦ 8 octobre 2013 07:18 CEST, Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name :
Though probably writing in this bug would
have been more efficient than writing in the topic of the IRC channel?
Yes, that's my only mistake.
Though of course it's a fundamental problem with non-DD packages: I've
made a
Hi!
Has someone already packages something depending on CFFI?
The verification phase of CFFI expects to be able to write a C file to
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/module/__pycache__/. This could be
triggered on postinst but maybe there is something better to do, like
some way to explain to
❦ 20 octobre 2013 14:09 CEST, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org :
Has someone already packages something depending on CFFI?
The verification phase of CFFI expects to be able to write a C file to
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/module/__pycache__/. This could be
triggered on postinst
❦ 16 novembre 2013 10:06 CET, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au :
Alternatively, I don't really care about the special features of ‘tox’;
I only want to run the test suite with the specific PYthon version. What
can I do in the build environment to run the test suite as ‘tox’ would
run
❦ 26 janvier 2014 02:49 CET, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org :
Modules managed by python-support are installed in another directory
which is added to the sys.path using the .pth mechanism.
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-python.html#s-paths
Oh ok. Thanks!
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
