Re: Request for review for Poetry(Was: Re: Asking for help Poetry)

2021-08-26 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hello!!!

I just push some updates to salsa


Here are my comments:
>
> 1. d/control:
>
> You haven't set the Python Team either in Maintainer or Uploaders.
>
> Ready my bad! Also I note that some dependencies that I package for Poetry
were uploaded and DPT was not the Maintainer, I'll change those.

> -
>
> 2. d/control:
>
> If you require specific dependencies, you should make it clear in
> d/control. It's the kind of thing that helps a lot if people decide to
> backport it.
>
> Ready

> -
>
> 3. tests/repositories/fixtures
>
> This directory contains a bunch of tarballs from other projects. I'm not
> sure what should be done with this, as I guess they are used in the
> testsuite
>
> My first reflex would be to exclude them from the imported tarball and
> disable the tests that require them, but I don't know how much of the
> testsuite depends on those tarballs.
>
> Maybe someone else from the team can chime-in?
>
> I will look at that these days. I can try to remove them and "turn off"
the test
that uses the tarballs.  Some days ago, I started to look at the pypy
package,
and it has the suittest in another package (btw, that is new for me).
Maybe poetry can have that approach? Also, I don't know if that makes sense.

> -
>
> 4. d/tests
>
> There are no autopkgtests. This being a large project that's kinda hard
> to package, I don't really mind for now.
>
> I think it's fair to wait to have at least 1 version in unstable before
> working on that.
>
yes, that was my idea.

>
> -
>
> 5. d/rules
>
> Isn't the step in execute_after_dh_auto_install better suited in
> execute_after_dh_clean instead? At least, it seems to me you're cleaning
> the ./foo dir you patched in.
>
> yes you're right, that makes more sense, thanks!

> -
>
> 6. Lintian: W: python3-poetry: no-manual-page usr/bin/poetry
>
> Again, not something that needs to be fixed, but each subcommand of
> poetry should probably get a man page:
>
> https://python-poetry.org/docs/cli/
>
> I looked at the code and I have no idea how this website is built (they
> don't use sphinx). It seems like they do something manual?
>
> https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/3382
>
> Anyway, here's an example of how I added man pages to a program with
> multiple commands:
>
> https://github.com/spl0k/supysonic/tree/master/docs/man
>
>
thanks for note it, I'll take a look these days.

> -
>
> Overall it's very good! The trickiest part to fix will likely be #3 :S
>
> > I need to skip some tests because use a non versioned python, so that
> > give me some troubles like "python don't exist".
> >
> > Also, there're some package (or package version) that aren't in Debian
> > yet. So, to save your time looking which are them I tell you that I run
> > the buildpackage in this way:
> >
> > ```
> >
> > gbp buildpackage --git-ignore-new
> >
> --extra-package=/home/eamanu/Debian/DEPENDENCIES/python3-cleo_0.8.1-1_all.deb
> >
> --extra-package=/home/eamanu/Debian/DEPENDENCIES/python3-httpretty_1.0.5-0.1_all.deb
> >
> --extra-package=/home/eamanu/Debian/DEPENDENCIES/python3-pkginfo_1.7.0-1_all.deb
>
> This package has not been updated on Salsa, or at least, I couldn't find
> version 1.7.0-1 anywhere. Maybe you forgot to push?
>
> Oh yes, I'm just psuh to salsa. Sorry!


Cheers!
Emmanuel


Re: Request for review for Poetry(Was: Re: Asking for help Poetry)

2021-07-02 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2021-07-02 18 h 25, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> 2. d/control:
> 
> If you require specific dependencies, you should make it clear in
> d/control. It's the kind of thing that helps a lot if people decide to
> backport it.

Specific _versions_ of dependencies. Sorry, Friday afternoon :)

-- 
Louis-Philippe Véronneau



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Request for review for Poetry(Was: Re: Asking for help Poetry)

2021-07-02 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
On 2021-06-19 18 h 21, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> 
> I want to tell you that I push to salsa an advances of poetry packaging.
> 
> Now, we have a complete package of poetry, so I'm requesting some more
> experienced reviewers.

Sorry, I said I would do this but it took me some time to actually do it :)

Thanks for working on poetry, it's 100% going to make our lives easier.

I have not read the upstream code, so I might be missing things...
That's the kind of thing I only do when a package is ready to be sponsored.

Here are my comments:

1. d/control:

You haven't set the Python Team either in Maintainer or Uploaders.

-

2. d/control:

If you require specific dependencies, you should make it clear in
d/control. It's the kind of thing that helps a lot if people decide to
backport it.

-

3. tests/repositories/fixtures

This directory contains a bunch of tarballs from other projects. I'm not
sure what should be done with this, as I guess they are used in the
testsuite

My first reflex would be to exclude them from the imported tarball and
disable the tests that require them, but I don't know how much of the
testsuite depends on those tarballs.

Maybe someone else from the team can chime-in?

-

4. d/tests

There are no autopkgtests. This being a large project that's kinda hard
to package, I don't really mind for now.

I think it's fair to wait to have at least 1 version in unstable before
working on that.

-

5. d/rules

Isn't the step in execute_after_dh_auto_install better suited in
execute_after_dh_clean instead? At least, it seems to me you're cleaning
the ./foo dir you patched in.

-

6. Lintian: W: python3-poetry: no-manual-page usr/bin/poetry

Again, not something that needs to be fixed, but each subcommand of
poetry should probably get a man page:

https://python-poetry.org/docs/cli/

I looked at the code and I have no idea how this website is built (they
don't use sphinx). It seems like they do something manual?

https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/3382

Anyway, here's an example of how I added man pages to a program with
multiple commands:

https://github.com/spl0k/supysonic/tree/master/docs/man

-

Overall it's very good! The trickiest part to fix will likely be #3 :S

> I need to skip some tests because use a non versioned python, so that
> give me some troubles like "python don't exist".
> 
> Also, there're some package (or package version) that aren't in Debian
> yet. So, to save your time looking which are them I tell you that I run
> the buildpackage in this way:
> 
> ```
> 
> gbp buildpackage --git-ignore-new
> --extra-package=/home/eamanu/Debian/DEPENDENCIES/python3-cleo_0.8.1-1_all.deb
> --extra-package=/home/eamanu/Debian/DEPENDENCIES/python3-httpretty_1.0.5-0.1_all.deb
> --extra-package=/home/eamanu/Debian/DEPENDENCIES/python3-pkginfo_1.7.0-1_all.deb

This package has not been updated on Salsa, or at least, I couldn't find
version 1.7.0-1 anywhere. Maybe you forgot to push?

I'm getting test failures on tests/inspection/test_info.py, but I'm
taking for granted it's because I don't have the right version.

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Request for review for Poetry(Was: Re: Asking for help Poetry)

2021-06-19 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hello everybody,

I want to tell you that I push to salsa an advances of poetry packaging.

Now, we have a complete package of poetry, so I'm requesting some more
experienced reviewers.

I need to skip some tests because use a non versioned python, so that
give me some troubles like "python don't exist".

Also, there're some package (or package version) that aren't in Debian
yet. So, to save your time looking which are them I tell you that I run
the buildpackage in this way:

```

gbp buildpackage --git-ignore-new
--extra-package=/home/eamanu/Debian/DEPENDENCIES/python3-cleo_0.8.1-1_all.deb
--extra-package=/home/eamanu/Debian/DEPENDENCIES/python3-httpretty_1.0.5-0.1_all.deb
--extra-package=/home/eamanu/Debian/DEPENDENCIES/python3-pkginfo_1.7.0-1_all.deb

```


Thanks for your help :)

Cheers,


-- 

Emmanuel Arias
@eamanu
yaerobi.com



OpenPGP_0xFA9DEC5DE11C63F1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hello Everybody,

I left some advances on poetry. Happily (from my point of view) we are near
to
having poetry packaged. I've just push some new commits to salsa [0].

After spend several times with the tests (see patches), we just have two
test that still fail (I didn't looking it yet):

tests/installation/test_pip_installer.py - fail one unit test
tests/utils/test_env.py -  fail several unit tests.

To build poetry, you will also need to build locally python3-cleo still in
NEW [1], python-httpretty 1.0.5:
I prepare a new upstream release and a member of OpenStack sponsored its  to
experimental (thanks Michal Arbet) [2] and pkginfo 1.7.0, I ping @jandd on
#debian-python
for a new upstream release packaging, but if I haven't got news about it
these days, I will push
my work and I'll ask for sponsorship.

[0] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=958366
[2]
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1241115/accepted-python-httpretty-105-01-source-into-experimental/

Cheers,
Emmanuel

On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 8:55 AM Emmanuel Arias  wrote:

> Hello!
>
> On 5/11/21 1:25 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 9:56 PM Emmanuel Arias 
> wrote:
> >> On 5/8/21 10:37 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias 
> wrote:
>  On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi  wrote:
> >> * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
> > are you handling this failure?
> >>> looks like this is fixed in git: do you need a sponsor?
> >> Yes, please. Thanks!
> > sounds good, i'll have a look at this package soon and let you know
> Thanks!
> >
> >> * python-cleo in review
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo I hope finished this
> week
> >>> stefanor uploaded it a few days ago
> >> Yes.
> >> * poetry still in progress
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> need help and
> reviews
> >>> for this one it looks like you imported a new upstream release a week
> >>> ago: is there something we can help/check about poetry?
> >> I've just push some advances. Currently, I'm working on tests, if you
> >> want to take a look.
> > maybe just ask here (or directly to me) if you have questions and
> > what's failing/needs work, so we dont duplicate work
> ok!
> >
> >> We need new upstream release for python-httpretty (for tests), that I
> >> upload to mentors [0]. @zigo ask me about test that this new upstream
> >> release doesn't break
> >> cloud-init and python3-scciclient (I would like to take a look to ratt
> >> for that).
> > ratt is pretty great, and rather simple to use:
> >
> > - setup a sbuild schroot for unstable
> > - build a binary package from the source you're working on
> > - `ratt _amd64.changes`
> >
> > and then you'll get on screen the results for each package + a
> > directory with the build results and logs
> >
> > https://github.com/Debian/ratt
> >
> > keep in mind it rebuilds packages sequentially, so it can take some
> > time if the number of reverse deps is high.
>
> Thanks for the advice!
>
> >
> >> Perhaps a good help from a more experienced person would be check if all
> >> is ok with DFSG,that's my biggest concern.
> > for which package specifically? while it's boring and long work, it's
> > also rather trivial: look at every single file (yep, all of them) from
> > the upstream source, and document their copyright and license in
> > d/copyright -- happy to answer questions if you have something
> > specific in mind about this
>
> Thanks, I hope have more news at the finish of the week
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> >
> > Regards,
>


Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-05-11 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hello!

On 5/11/21 1:25 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 9:56 PM Emmanuel Arias  wrote:
>> On 5/8/21 10:37 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias  wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi  wrote:
>> * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
> are you handling this failure?
>>> looks like this is fixed in git: do you need a sponsor?
>> Yes, please. Thanks!
> sounds good, i'll have a look at this package soon and let you know
Thanks!
>
>> * python-cleo in review 
>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo I hope finished this 
>> week
>>> stefanor uploaded it a few days ago
>> Yes.
>> * poetry still in progress 
>> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> need help and 
>> reviews
>>> for this one it looks like you imported a new upstream release a week
>>> ago: is there something we can help/check about poetry?
>> I've just push some advances. Currently, I'm working on tests, if you
>> want to take a look.
> maybe just ask here (or directly to me) if you have questions and
> what's failing/needs work, so we dont duplicate work
ok!
>
>> We need new upstream release for python-httpretty (for tests), that I
>> upload to mentors [0]. @zigo ask me about test that this new upstream
>> release doesn't break
>> cloud-init and python3-scciclient (I would like to take a look to ratt
>> for that).
> ratt is pretty great, and rather simple to use:
>
> - setup a sbuild schroot for unstable
> - build a binary package from the source you're working on
> - `ratt _amd64.changes`
>
> and then you'll get on screen the results for each package + a
> directory with the build results and logs
>
> https://github.com/Debian/ratt
>
> keep in mind it rebuilds packages sequentially, so it can take some
> time if the number of reverse deps is high.

Thanks for the advice!

>
>> Perhaps a good help from a more experienced person would be check if all
>> is ok with DFSG,that's my biggest concern.
> for which package specifically? while it's boring and long work, it's
> also rather trivial: look at every single file (yep, all of them) from
> the upstream source, and document their copyright and license in
> d/copyright -- happy to answer questions if you have something
> specific in mind about this

Thanks, I hope have more news at the finish of the week

Cheers!


>
> Regards,


OpenPGP_0xFA9DEC5DE11C63F1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-05-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 9:56 PM Emmanuel Arias  wrote:
> On 5/8/21 10:37 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias  wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi  wrote:
>  * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
> >>> are you handling this failure?
> > looks like this is fixed in git: do you need a sponsor?
> Yes, please. Thanks!

sounds good, i'll have a look at this package soon and let you know

>  * python-cleo in review 
>  https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo I hope finished this 
>  week
> > stefanor uploaded it a few days ago
> Yes.
>  * poetry still in progress 
>  https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> need help and 
>  reviews
> > for this one it looks like you imported a new upstream release a week
> > ago: is there something we can help/check about poetry?
>
> I've just push some advances. Currently, I'm working on tests, if you
> want to take a look.

maybe just ask here (or directly to me) if you have questions and
what's failing/needs work, so we dont duplicate work

> We need new upstream release for python-httpretty (for tests), that I
> upload to mentors [0]. @zigo ask me about test that this new upstream
> release doesn't break
> cloud-init and python3-scciclient (I would like to take a look to ratt
> for that).

ratt is pretty great, and rather simple to use:

- setup a sbuild schroot for unstable
- build a binary package from the source you're working on
- `ratt _amd64.changes`

and then you'll get on screen the results for each package + a
directory with the build results and logs

https://github.com/Debian/ratt

keep in mind it rebuilds packages sequentially, so it can take some
time if the number of reverse deps is high.

> Perhaps a good help from a more experienced person would be check if all
> is ok with DFSG,that's my biggest concern.

for which package specifically? while it's boring and long work, it's
also rather trivial: look at every single file (yep, all of them) from
the upstream source, and document their copyright and license in
d/copyright -- happy to answer questions if you have something
specific in mind about this

Regards,
-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi



Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-05-08 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hello Sandro,


Thanks for write me.

On 5/8/21 10:37 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias  wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi  wrote:
 * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
>>> are you handling this failure?
> looks like this is fixed in git: do you need a sponsor?
Yes, please. Thanks!
 * python-cleo in review https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo 
 I hope finished this week
> stefanor uploaded it a few days ago
Yes.
 * poetry still in progress 
 https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> need help and 
 reviews
> for this one it looks like you imported a new upstream release a week
> ago: is there something we can help/check about poetry?

I've just push some advances. Currently, I'm working on tests, if you
want to take a look.

We need new upstream release for python-httpretty (for tests), that I
upload to mentors [0]. @zigo ask me about test that this new upstream
release doesn't break
cloud-init and python3-scciclient (I would like to take a look to ratt
for that).

Perhaps a good help from a more experienced person would be check if all
is ok with DFSG,that's my biggest concern.

[0] https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-httpretty/

Cheers!

Emmanuel



OpenPGP_0xFA9DEC5DE11C63F1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-05-08 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:29 AM Emmanuel Arias  wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi  wrote:
>>
>> > * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
>>
>> are you handling this failure?

looks like this is fixed in git: do you need a sponsor?

>> > * python-cleo in review https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo 
>> > I hope finished this week

stefanor uploaded it a few days ago

>> > * poetry still in progress 
>> > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> need help and 
>> > reviews

for this one it looks like you imported a new upstream release a week
ago: is there something we can help/check about poetry?

Regards,
-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi



Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-03-15 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hi,

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:22 AM Sandro Tosi  wrote:

> > * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
>
> are you handling this failure?
>
> > * python-cleo in review
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo I hope finished this
> week
> > * poetry still in progress
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> need help and
> reviews
>
> what kind of help do you need here?
>

Basically, with tests. There're so many setup.py on tests cases and we
should identify
if that test has some internet connections or not.  Also, each setup.py has
its Copyright and License
so that should be added to d/copyright, or repack?

Cheers,
Emmanuel

>
> --
> Sandro "morph" Tosi
> My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
> Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
>


Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-03-15 Thread Emmanuel Arias
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:50 AM Bastian Venthur  wrote:

> Hi Emmanuel,
>
> I find it amazing that you went through all the hassle of un-bundeling
> and actually packaging all the dependencies for poetry!
>
>
> Good job and thank you very much for your efforts!
>

Thanks!!

>
> Bastian
>
> --
> Dr. Bastian Venthur https://venthur.de
> Debian Developer venthur at debian org
>
>


Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-03-15 Thread Bastian Venthur

Hi Emmanuel,

I find it amazing that you went through all the hassle of un-bundeling 
and actually packaging all the dependencies for poetry!



Good job and thank you very much for your efforts!

Bastian

--
Dr. Bastian Venthur https://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org



Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-03-15 Thread Sandro Tosi
> * poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/

are you handling this failure?

> * python-cleo in review https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo I 
> hope finished this week
> * poetry still in progress 
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> need help and reviews

what kind of help do you need here?

-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi



Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-03-12 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hi everyone,

I leave an update about poetry packaging status.

* poetry-core failing https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/poetry-core/
* pastel in testing https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pastel
* pylev in testing https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pylev
* crashtest in testing https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/crashtest
* clikit in testing https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/clikit
* shellingham in testing https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/shellingham

* python-cleo in review https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/cleo
I hope finished this week
* poetry still in progress
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/poetry -> need help and
reviews

My goal is to finish poetry package before april.

Cheers,
Emmanuel

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 2:03 PM Sandro Tosi  wrote:

> Hello Emmanuel,
>
> > From the missing dependencies we have:
> > * poetry-core in NEW [0]
> > * pastel in NEW need for clikit [1]
> > * pylev in NEW need for clikit [2]
> > * crashtest has RFS need for clikit [3]
> > * clikit is ready on salsa but waiting for crashtest before RFS [4]
> > * cleo ready but waiting for clikit [5]
> > * shellingham not ready nor ITP yet.
> > * poetry some advances on salsa [6]
> >
> > For experience in the other packages (pylev, paste, etc) and for
> recommendation of DDs,
> > poetry package use upstream github repository where we have important
> things like
> > tests. I was looking and exist lot of setup.py that makes me think that
> we will need
> > repack the upstream package.
> >
> > I will continue working on it but after my reset week, I will be offline
> until 9 january
>
> can you provide a status update on poetry packaging? more and more
> upstreams are moving (or planning) to poetry, so having it available
> asap is definitely important.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Sandro "morph" Tosi
> My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
> Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
>


Re: Asking for help Poetry

2021-03-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Emmanuel,

> From the missing dependencies we have:
> * poetry-core in NEW [0]
> * pastel in NEW need for clikit [1]
> * pylev in NEW need for clikit [2]
> * crashtest has RFS need for clikit [3]
> * clikit is ready on salsa but waiting for crashtest before RFS [4]
> * cleo ready but waiting for clikit [5]
> * shellingham not ready nor ITP yet.
> * poetry some advances on salsa [6]
>
> For experience in the other packages (pylev, paste, etc) and for  
> recommendation of DDs,
> poetry package use upstream github repository where we have important things 
> like
> tests. I was looking and exist lot of setup.py that makes me think that we 
> will need
> repack the upstream package.
>
> I will continue working on it but after my reset week, I will be offline 
> until 9 january

can you provide a status update on poetry packaging? more and more
upstreams are moving (or planning) to poetry, so having it available
asap is definitely important.

Regards,
-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi



Re: Asking for help Poetry

2020-12-04 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hi everyone,

After read [0] and thinking about it, IMO the best solution is try to
package python-poetry,
and its dependencies. I make a very simple (and probably wrong) script [1]
to verify the
package that will be need package into Debian, before poetry package.

[{'name': 'cleo'}, {'name': 'clikit'}, {'name': 'crashtest'}, {'name':
'shellingham'}, {'name': 'pastel'}, {'name': 'pylev'}]

Please feel free to ITP them :)

[0] https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2346
[1] https://github.com/eamanu/pydebdep

On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 11:03 AM Emmanuel Arias  wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> In the last week I re-take this work.
>
> But, we need to discuss the poetry situation. First of all, poetry
> upstream doesn't consider
> adding vendor libs to the source. They have their reasons about this
> situation. I recommend
> you read this [0] [1].
>
> The problem here, is that poetry need some dependencies that are not in
> Debian yet,
> and that dependencies have more dependencies (not in Debian).
>
> Here there're some possibilities that from my point of view we can follow.
> If you read [0] @abn recommend use `sonnet` script to build poetry
> but is not maintained. In the other hand we can can try to package
> poetry-core
> that is a more pip similar case with the vendor libs.
>
> In this week I want to make some tests using `sonnet` and look poetry-core
> with the aim to  package poetry before freezing Debian.
>
> I can send you (not today) the list of the dependencies that will be need
> package if we want poetry in Debian.
>
> This is my analysis about poetry (from a not so experienced DM) I will
> happy to listen to more experienced people about this, and if you consider
> correct that I mention, please.
>
> Thanks!
>
> [0] https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2607
> [1] https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2346
>
>
> Cheers,
> Arias Emmanuel
> @eamanu
> yaerobi.com
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:16 PM Bastian Venthur 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see some updates on the salsa repository, any chance we can get this
>> package ready before the next freeze so we'll have it in the next stable
>> release?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bastian
>>
>> On 29.06.20 06:04, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On June 29, 2020 3:08:53 AM UTC, Emmanuel Arias 
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I'm working on poetry packaging, I created on salsa de repository [0].
>> >>
>> >> Note that there are many packages that are not in Debian like cachy,
>> >> cleo,
>> >> etc.
>> >>
>> >> I RFS python-cachy [1] and now I'm working on cleo, which depends on
>> >> clikit
>> >> that is not on Debian (if I search correctly).
>> >>
>> >> Bastian Venthur note me that pienv, pip have vendors folder with the
>> >> dependencies
>> >> but looking on poetry that _vendor folder is empty.
>> >>
>> >> So, looking for I more experienced opinion, do you think that we would
>> >> try
>> >> convince
>> >> to upstream to make available vendors on the release (if that is
>> >> necessary)
>> >> or
>> >> we need to package all the missing dependencies?
>> >
>> > Definitely they should be packaged.
>> >
>> > At least for pip none of the vendored libs are used in Debian's
>> package.  Fortunately upstream supports use of system libs with only minor
>> patching.
>> >
>> > Scott K
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Bastian Venthur  http://venthur.de
>> Debian Developer venthur at debian org
>>
>>


Re: Asking for help Poetry

2020-11-22 Thread Emmanuel Arias
Hi everyone,

In the last week I re-take this work.

But, we need to discuss the poetry situation. First of all, poetry upstream
doesn't consider
adding vendor libs to the source. They have their reasons about this
situation. I recommend
you read this [0] [1].

The problem here, is that poetry need some dependencies that are not in
Debian yet,
and that dependencies have more dependencies (not in Debian).

Here there're some possibilities that from my point of view we can follow.
If you read [0] @abn recommend use `sonnet` script to build poetry
but is not maintained. In the other hand we can can try to package
poetry-core
that is a more pip similar case with the vendor libs.

In this week I want to make some tests using `sonnet` and look poetry-core
with the aim to  package poetry before freezing Debian.

I can send you (not today) the list of the dependencies that will be need
package if we want poetry in Debian.

This is my analysis about poetry (from a not so experienced DM) I will
happy to listen to more experienced people about this, and if you consider
correct that I mention, please.

Thanks!

[0] https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2607
[1] https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2346


Cheers,
Arias Emmanuel
@eamanu
yaerobi.com


On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:16 PM Bastian Venthur  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I see some updates on the salsa repository, any chance we can get this
> package ready before the next freeze so we'll have it in the next stable
> release?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bastian
>
> On 29.06.20 06:04, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >
> >
> > On June 29, 2020 3:08:53 AM UTC, Emmanuel Arias 
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm working on poetry packaging, I created on salsa de repository [0].
> >>
> >> Note that there are many packages that are not in Debian like cachy,
> >> cleo,
> >> etc.
> >>
> >> I RFS python-cachy [1] and now I'm working on cleo, which depends on
> >> clikit
> >> that is not on Debian (if I search correctly).
> >>
> >> Bastian Venthur note me that pienv, pip have vendors folder with the
> >> dependencies
> >> but looking on poetry that _vendor folder is empty.
> >>
> >> So, looking for I more experienced opinion, do you think that we would
> >> try
> >> convince
> >> to upstream to make available vendors on the release (if that is
> >> necessary)
> >> or
> >> we need to package all the missing dependencies?
> >
> > Definitely they should be packaged.
> >
> > At least for pip none of the vendored libs are used in Debian's
> package.  Fortunately upstream supports use of system libs with only minor
> patching.
> >
> > Scott K
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dr. Bastian Venthur  http://venthur.de
> Debian Developer venthur at debian org
>
>


Re: Asking for help Poetry

2020-11-19 Thread Bastian Venthur

Hi,

I see some updates on the salsa repository, any chance we can get this 
package ready before the next freeze so we'll have it in the next stable 
release?



Cheers,

Bastian

On 29.06.20 06:04, Scott Kitterman wrote:



On June 29, 2020 3:08:53 AM UTC, Emmanuel Arias  wrote:

Hi,

I'm working on poetry packaging, I created on salsa de repository [0].

Note that there are many packages that are not in Debian like cachy,
cleo,
etc.

I RFS python-cachy [1] and now I'm working on cleo, which depends on
clikit
that is not on Debian (if I search correctly).

Bastian Venthur note me that pienv, pip have vendors folder with the
dependencies
but looking on poetry that _vendor folder is empty.

So, looking for I more experienced opinion, do you think that we would
try
convince
to upstream to make available vendors on the release (if that is
necessary)
or
we need to package all the missing dependencies?


Definitely they should be packaged.

At least for pip none of the vendored libs are used in Debian's package.  
Fortunately upstream supports use of system libs with only minor patching.

Scott K





--
Dr. Bastian Venthur  http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org



Re: Asking for help Poetry

2020-06-28 Thread Scott Kitterman



On June 29, 2020 3:08:53 AM UTC, Emmanuel Arias  wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm working on poetry packaging, I created on salsa de repository [0].
>
>Note that there are many packages that are not in Debian like cachy,
>cleo,
>etc.
>
>I RFS python-cachy [1] and now I'm working on cleo, which depends on
>clikit
>that is not on Debian (if I search correctly).
>
>Bastian Venthur note me that pienv, pip have vendors folder with the
>dependencies
>but looking on poetry that _vendor folder is empty.
>
>So, looking for I more experienced opinion, do you think that we would
>try
>convince
>to upstream to make available vendors on the release (if that is
>necessary)
>or
>we need to package all the missing dependencies?

Definitely they should be packaged.

At least for pip none of the vendored libs are used in Debian's package.  
Fortunately upstream supports use of system libs with only minor patching.

Scott K