Il Sabato 5 Luglio 2014 17:26, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu ha scritto:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 10:41:09AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Andreas, thanks for doing this!
I propose also to change the maintainer if you think is better, don't
IMHO the maintainer should be a team (either Debian Science or Debian
Python) and it seems reasonable to put the team in charge which is
owning the VCS where the package is maintained. Since the package
technically fits into Python and from content into Science there is no
clear rule to decide. The Blends framework can be used in any case. It
is no requirement to maintain a package in a certain team.
Anyway I'm looking for a sponsor (I already have a busy one in
Since I think that the package clearly fits into Deban Science Blend I'm
if you would use Sponsering of Blends:
(I changed from python to science for a really good reason: python uses svn and
science uses git, and I'm a really a git user and supporter :p )
Wonderful, I added a line on that list.
Just some questions:
-I did not create the git on debian-science (I'm not yet accepted by the team),
but I put the url as it will be if accepted
(in the meanwhile the git is also here
-I'm not sure about the field Link to Web sentinel...
One drawback of using Debian Python VCS is that it is not (yet) scanned
for new packages and thus the package does not yet show up on the
Science viewing page. Since I'm aware about this I would not mind about
this requirement of SoB.
and BTW the KGB bots in debian-science are broken (mdtx tried many times to
unsuccessfully contact you, so I'm taking the opportunity to make you aware
of the problem)
I was contacted at least twice by somebody (may be mdtx - whoever this
might be) and I answered in publich to the Debian Med maintainer list (I
was contacted about Debian Med KGB) that I have no idea what needs to be
done and I also have currently no time to make up my mind. I personally
do not use KGB features and I expect somebody else in the team to do the
necessary means to fix this. If this is considered unsuccessfully
contact than yes, this was unsuccessful. But I have no idea why it
should be me who should fix each and any piece of infrastructure. B-)
So please in cases like this contact the team or use the BTS to report
Sorry, I was not so clear, I wrote unsuccessfully because the irc user asked
me many times about your mail, because he wasn't sure he ad the right mail
For this problem please forget about it, as soon as I'll be accepted on the
science team (I cannot see the kgb configuration file since I'm not in the
science group) I'll take care of it. I have already setup this on pkg-boinc, so
I have little knowledge about the troubleshooting of this stuff.
I would like just ask you if you can forward to me the kgb mail you received,
just to have a starting point about the problem.
Have a nice sunday,
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org