Re: please test the numpy package

2009-02-06 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 05:57, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz (05/02/2009): Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a Ubuntu user that he will rather consider

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-02-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
hence no reason to allow for a transition to testing. Moreover, I promise that pymvpa will not attempt such thing ;-) What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it? Sphinx 0.4.3 is the classic example: It causes more trouble than it fixed. For example try building

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-02-05 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: 3) upload to experimental 3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental) I'd recommends this. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian:

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-02-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 17:21, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: 3) upload to experimental 3a) keep the sphinx docs (sphinx is in experimental) I'd recommends this. Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-02-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz (05/02/2009): Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA himself, because he cannot use debian experimental. Of course. So he needs to invest his time in the

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-02-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz (05/02/2009): Ok. But we are wasting people's time. I just got another email from a Ubuntu user that he will rather consider compiling it for Ubuntu's PPA himself, because he cannot use debian

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-26 Thread Michael Hanke
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:15:47AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]: I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine that -- it might provide some facts about

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-26 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26] On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:15:47AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]: I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine that -- it

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-26 Thread Michael Hanke
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:47:02AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: [Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26] On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:15:47AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: * Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]: I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually build-depend

Sphinx (was: Re: please test the numpy package)

2009-01-26 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-26] On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:47:02AM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: What about Sphinx 0.4.3? Does it mean we will not try to unblock it? Sphinx 0.4.3 is the classic example: It causes more trouble than it fixed. For example try building pymvpa's docs with it -- it

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25] There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on sphinx-0.5, which is currently only in experimental. And also upstream doesn't have it in the tarball. I originally fixed that by adding a new target into debian/rules, that downloaded the upstream tgz,

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:53:05AM -0800, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please test the package? There is a problem with documentation, that it depends on

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Ondrej Certik schrieb: Hi, I finally packaged the newest uptream and committed all fixes into our svn repo for numpy. Kumar (or others), do you think you could please test the package? numpy becomes big. see https://launchpad.net/bugs/309215. In the past the parts depending on external

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, Ondrej Certik wrote: I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that this is what unstable is for. Otherwise people will have to move from

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Ondrej Certik wrote: I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that this is what unstable is for. Otherwise people will have to move from

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote: Hi, Ondrej Certik wrote: I really want it in unstable. It's because the new scipy won't build without this upload etc. and many people are just waiting for it. It's a legitimate question though, but so far I understood that

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25] To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable? This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems which prevent successful building of docs (e.g. image/figure handling bug) -- and at least this one is solved in 0.5. if

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote: [Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25] To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable? This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems which prevent successful building of docs (e.g.

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Piotr Ożarowski
[Ondrej Certik, 2009-01-25] On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Piotr Ożarowski pi...@debian.org wrote: if you will help me convince release managers to unblock it, I will upload 0.5 to unstable (if Mikhail will not protest). So release managers are blocking any uploads of sphinx to unstable?

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Michael Hanke
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:47:06PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: [Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25] To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable? This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems which prevent successful building of docs (e.g.

Re: please test the numpy package

2009-01-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Michael Hanke [Mon, 26 Jan 2009 06:37:13 +0100]: I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine that -- it might provide some facts about the situation we are speculating about. % zcat