Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team]

2020-07-08 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, st 8. 7. 2020 v 12:14 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > There would be no point doing that, as all what pybuild would be doing > (ie: setup.py install and unit testing), I'd be overriding it. it's doing much more, but nevermind. > The other > (IMO preferred) way would be to contribute

Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team]

2020-07-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 7/7/20 8:20 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > po 6. 7. 2020 v 11:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand > napsal: > > This isn't about hating or loving pybuild. This is all about being able > to control how this set of packages are build globally (the whole set of >

Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team]

2020-07-07 Thread Ondrej Novy
Hi, po 6. 7. 2020 v 11:09 odesílatel Thomas Goirand napsal: > This isn't about hating or loving pybuild. This is all about being able > to control how this set of packages are build globally (the whole set of > packages. so you could wrap these global things around pybuild, right? -- Best

Re: pybuild vs os-pkg-tools [was: Maintaining all of the testing-cabal packages under the OpenStack team]

2020-07-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 6/29/20 8:34 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote: > for my packages (i'm uploader): no, sorry. > > Reasons: > 1. I hate openstack-pkg-tools > 2. I like pybuild > 3. you hate pybuild and don't want to use it I thought about this for a long time, thinking if I should leave it unanswered or not. Finally, I