On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 03:16:19PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> 2) There are some wnpp bugs "fixed in NMU". I haven't got a clue
>what that's supposed to mean.
Typically a screw-up, where somebody made a maintainer upload which
looked like an NMU because the names in debian/control an
microwindows is not building on powerpc, but I don't know why. The
bug report filed seems wrong to me, and the buildd report at
http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=powerpc&state=Dep-Wait
reports:
libs/microwindows_0.88pre11-4: Dep-Wait by schmitz-pb [optional:uncompiled]
Dependencies: freet
* Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020103 15:10]:
> Ok, I've gone through all the ITAs on the wnpp list and used Adrian's
> algorithm.
> [...]
Thanks Thomas!
--
-- Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ok, I've gone through all the ITAs on the wnpp list and used Adrian's
algorithm.
Two more wnpp maintenance questions:
1) There are a metric ton of ITPs. *Something* should be done. But I
don't know what.
2) There are some wnpp bugs "fixed in NMU". I haven't got a clue
what that's suppo
* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011219 02:11]:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 07:56:12PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> > > > Why aren't these pages in the debian-wml CVS with the rest of the
> > > > Debian WWW site? It is due to the PHP generated charts?
> > > >
> > > > http://qa.debian.org
On 1 Jan 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> So Adrian Bunk seems to have done the last run-through of this, and
> there are a number of packages for which the last mention was his "do
> you really still want to adopt this?"--so, Adrian, what's the status?
> I don't want to collide with your work.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:57:23AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > You're right, but you certainly shouldn't do uploads just for the sake
> > of changing the maintainer field. Fix the maintainer field with other
> > bugs (or lintian warnings or update to the latest policy) and then it's
> >
> See the referenced bug.
It first craps out when looking for libnano-X.a which is in
devel/libmicrowindows0-fb-dbg or devel/libmicrowindows0-x11-dbg. Ditto for
libmwdrivers.a.
Looks like it build depends on itself and needs special bootstrapping?
Other problems: needs sys/io.h which appears to
Hullo,
On http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/testing_probs.html would it be
possible to link the names of source packages
e.g.
* Binaries from cannot be installed:
to the relevant debcheck page on the qa website
http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=testing&package=
This should help tracki
* Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020103 11:45]:
> Hmm, maybe lintian should warn for wrong QA maintainer addresses.
There's a bug filed about this already (#126687).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:57:23AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > You're right, but you certainly shouldn't do uploads just for the sake
> > of changing the maintainer field. Fix the maintainer field with other
> > bugs (or lintian warnings or update to the latest policy) and then it's
> >
Hi Thomas!
You wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] was the right address some months ago ... the
> > mail (bug reports) is still delivered here. So not much is lost.
>
> Indeed. It's mostly record keeping and BTS simplicity that I'm
> concerned about.
Hmm, maybe lintian should warn for wrong QA maint
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:09:10PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG écrivait:
> > However, many packages have debian-qa@lists.debian.org, and a few have
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] was the right address some months ago ... the
> mail (bug r
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020102 21:24]:
> > a package has been orphaned for three months, it's moved from the
> > main archive to the "project/orphaned" directory. And, after
>
> There is no project/orphaned. What we should be
* Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020102 21:24]:
> a package has been orphaned for three months, it's moved from the
> main archive to the "project/orphaned" directory. And, after
There is no project/orphaned. What we should be doing before woody is
released is go through the listing
Le Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:09:10PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG écrivait:
> However, many packages have debian-qa@lists.debian.org, and a few have
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] was the right address some months ago ... the
mail (bug reports) is still delivered here. So not much is lost.
>
Hi Thomas!
You wrote:
> http://qa.debian.org/documentation/qa.html/ch-rules.html
>
> This says that for packages with Priority: lower than standard, after
> a package has been orphaned for three months, it's moved from the main
> archive to the "project/orphaned" directory. And, after another y
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the purposes of the freeze, standard includes everything that is in
> a tasksel task, and all of their dependencies.
Ah, now I understand. Thanks for clarifying.
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> > Why is slapd listed in http://base.debian.net/?
Probably because it has the same source package as libldap2, on which
exim depends.
> And also, there are many "optional" packages listed in
> standard.debian.net.
See the referenced bug.
I would be happy to try and fix this myself, but I don't have access
to a powerpc running sid.
If someone could either work on fixing this and submit a patch, or
alternatively, point me at a powerpc sid box, then I'd work on it
myself.
Please CC me and debian-qa directly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Why is slapd listed in http://base.debian.net/?
And also, there are many "optional" packages listed in
standard.debian.net. What's up with these two pages?
Why is slapd listed in http://base.debian.net/?
22 matches
Mail list logo
