On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 08:43:57PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> I don't understand why you need an overrides file. Why not just submit
> wishlist bugs, with a link to a QA page that explains why a watch file
> is a Good Thing[TM] even if it is of no use for the individual
> maintainer?
Because ma
Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had added to DEHS http://dehs.alioth.debian.org a new functionality
> about "by maintainer" dehs summary.
>
> Try it and make suggestion.
>
> Next step: dehs ovveride??
>
> Colud be need some access restriction features for enter an overrided
> wat
Hi,
I had added to DEHS http://dehs.alioth.debian.org a new functionality
about "by maintainer" dehs summary.
Try it and make suggestion.
Next step: dehs ovveride??
Colud be need some access restriction features for enter an overrided
watch file (and test)? How Maintainer will integrate it in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Barth wrote:
| * Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040611 12:55]:
|
|>Nobody wants to comment? Nobody has an idea about how to handle this?
|>Especially the copyright problems filed in 2002 that haven't had any
|>maintainer reaction i
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040611 12:55]:
> Nobody wants to comment? Nobody has an idea about how to handle this?
> Especially the copyright problems filed in 2002 that haven't had any
> maintainer reaction is IMHO a bit problematic, a maintainer should
> really do something about
Hey, my name is jen and I'm new to this online dating thing.
I've just my profile up, you should come check it out it's interesting.
I just want to get to know you a little better if you don't mind, come check my
profile out at:
www.starjen.com/cam.html
I also got a videocam so we can make it
* Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-11 12:52]:
> Nobody wants to comment? Nobody has an idea about how to handle
> this? Especially the copyright problems filed in 2002 that haven't
> had any maintainer reaction is IMHO a bit problematic, a maintainer
> should really do something
Nobody wants to comment? Nobody has an idea about how to handle this?
Especially the copyright problems filed in 2002 that haven't had any
maintainer reaction is IMHO a bit problematic, a maintainer should
really do something about at least the legal stuff of his package.
I'd prefer some respected
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail.
550 5.1.1 User unknown
Reporting-MTA: navadmin@dataviz.com
Final-Recipient: rfc822;udph5hetmd0617@dataviz.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; Cannot
9 matches
Mail list logo
