Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote: > It's just something I've started doing to make these bugs easier to > ignore on . > > > I find this rather strange ... why not simply CC the bug greports so > > that anyone trying to fix it will discover that the pa

Bug#356776: PTS: lingering new upstream version todo

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:50:00PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: minor > > The package tracking page at: > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnubg.html > > still says that a new upstream version was found, despite the fact that > I uploaded a Debian package

Dehs and developer.php

I had seen some thread about problem with dehs and the qa pages. Actually i'm maintaining the dehs data and scripts. There was some problem on dehs in the past months about unavailability of changelog data on packages.debian.org. Actually i'm using packages.debian.net as source of changelog data

Bug#356776: PTS: lingering new upstream version todo

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor The package tracking page at: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnubg.html still says that a new upstream version was found, despite the fact that I uploaded a Debian package with that version some time back and it's migrated into testing. The watch colu

RM: python-bsddb3 -- RoQA; orphaned, bundled with Python 2.3+

retitle 264695 RM: python-bsddb3 -- RoQA; orphaned, bundled with Python 2.3+ reassign 264695 ftp.debian.org severity 352917 serious thanks Please remove python-bsddb3; it has been superseded by the bsddb module now bundled with Python itself. apt-proxy, the only reverse dependency left, has had a

Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives

Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote: >> retitle 275774 RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives >> reassign 275774 ftp.debian.org >> block 202764 by 275774 >> block 356098 by 275774 > > Is this a new policy to block (RC) bug by t

pts.d.o ?

Has anyone (recently) persued a dns record for pts.debian.org? It would only make sense to me, since this is a primary resource for developers, and I recall at one point someone indicating that they didn't use the PTS because of its obscure fqdn :) Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Bug#356730: qa.debian.org: developer.php has a bad link for "bug statistics"

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal developer.php has a link for "Bug Statistics": http://www.debian.gr.jp/~kitame/maint.cgi?num=srcs&limit=0&showpkgs=on&maint= but this link doesn't exist...indeed the host seems down. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Re: pts.d.o ?

Justin Pryzby wrote: Has anyone (recently) persued a dns record for pts.debian.org? It would only make sense to me, since this is a primary resource for developers, and I recall at one point someone indicating that they didn't use the PTS because of its obscure fqdn :) pts.debian.org pointin

Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 04:59:29PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote: > > retitle 275774 RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives > > reassign 275774 ftp.debian.org > > block 202764 by 275774 > > block 356098 by 275774 > > Is this a new poli

Re: RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Matej Vela wrote: > retitle 275774 RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives > reassign 275774 ftp.debian.org > block 202764 by 275774 > block 356098 by 275774 Is this a new policy to block (RC) bug by the request of removal bug ? I find this rather strang

Bug#311964: How to handle pseudo packages

On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 08:23:12AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > The PTS should download a list of pseudopackages so that it avoids giving > the current warning. The list is available via rsync: Also, the web interface could display a vanity page listing this info, and just the PTS subscription

RM: kbear -- RoQA; orphaned for 200+ days, unusable

retitle 315340 RM: kbear -- RoQA; orphaned for 200+ days, unusable reassign 315340 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we should remove kbear. * Orphaned for 264 days. * Unusable due to a long-standing RC bug (crashes on file transfers). * Already removed from testing. * Alternatives: gftp-gtk,

RM: gcombust -- RoQA; orphaned for a year, upstream inactive

retitle 288267 RM: gcombust -- RoQA; orphaned for a year, upstream inactive reassign 288267 ftp.debian.org thanks I think we should remove gcombust. * Orphaned for 1 year and 69 days. * 14 outstanding bugs. * Alternatives: eroaster, gcdw, gtoaster, xcdroast. * Last upstream release in 200

RM: memprof -- RoQA; orphaned for 200 days, RC bugs

retitle 324607 RM: memprof -- RoQA; orphaned for 200 days, RC bugs reassign 324607 ftp.debian.org block 119793 by 324607 block 309577 by 324607 block 349295 by 324607 block 349453 by 324607 thanks I think we should remove memprof. * Orphaned for 202 days. * 2 RC bugs (unusable). * Graphical

RM: rawrec, soundgrab -- RoQA; orphaned for a year, RC bug

retitle 288215 RM: rawrec -- RoQA; orphaned for a year, RC bug reassign 288215 ftp.debian.org retitle 288216 RM: soundgrab -- RoQA; orphaned for a year, depends on rawrec reassign 288216 ftp.debian.org block 167562 by 288215 block 225760 by 288215 block 323175 by 288215 thanks I think we should re

RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives

retitle 275774 RM: oonsoo -- RoQA; orphaned for 500+ days, many alternatives reassign 275774 ftp.debian.org block 202764 by 275774 block 356098 by 275774 thanks I think we should remove oonsoo. * Orphaned for 1 year and 154 days. * 1 soon-to-be-RC bug (build failure with g++ 4.1). * Many al

Re: Compiler transitions status report

On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 01:50 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > The following library packages still needs renaming for the C++ ABI change > (see http://people.debian.org/~djpig/gcc-transition/, among others): > Not in testing. > > postgis -- uninstallable, maintainer appears to be MIA Maintainer i