Automated mails to maintainers to inform them of their pkg status

2006-11-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, With the release getting closer, I have the impression that some (a lot of?) maintainers are unaware of the "buginess" status of their packages. Of course, there's the weekly mail on d-d-a, but it doesn't really answer the question of "are my packages OK ?". Ideally, this would reuse a lot of

Re: XS-Vcs-field

2006-11-13 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On dom, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > tla is wrong. The name of the protocol is arch; and tla and > baz are competing implementations of the standard. Agreed, will fix this. > I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific > header, XS-Vcs- wher

Processed: Re: Bug#398332: www.debian.org: QA pages claim to be W3C-clean but are not

2006-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 398332 qa.debian.org Bug#398332: www.debian.org: QA pages claim to be W3C-clean but are not Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Re: XS-Vcs-field

2006-11-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific > header, XS-Vcs- where name is one keyword from a specified list > (bzr, cvs, svn, darcs, git, hf, or arch), and XS-VCS-Browse, which is > a plain old HTTP URL. Yes, thi