Hi,
With the release getting closer, I have the impression that some (a lot
of?) maintainers are unaware of the "buginess" status of their packages.
Of course, there's the weekly mail on d-d-a, but it doesn't really
answer the question of "are my packages OK ?".
Ideally, this would reuse a lot of
On dom, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> tla is wrong. The name of the protocol is arch; and tla and
> baz are competing implementations of the standard.
Agreed, will fix this.
> I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific
> header, XS-Vcs- wher
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 398332 qa.debian.org
Bug#398332: www.debian.org: QA pages claim to be W3C-clean but are not
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 14:02 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I suggest that we specify tow headers: and SCM specific
> header, XS-Vcs- where name is one keyword from a specified list
> (bzr, cvs, svn, darcs, git, hf, or arch), and XS-VCS-Browse, which is
> a plain old HTTP URL.
Yes, thi
4 matches
Mail list logo