Ok.. i tried to apply this patch (i commented the old version of the
function).
Seems quite good.
For the whole Dehs system data update we will wait Sunday for the
regular alioth cron dehs run.
Cheers,
Ste
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 269493 patch
Bug#269493: developer.php: fault in watch version comparison
There were no tags set.
Bug#376252: DDPO: watch column has same version but is magenta
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
On 11100 March 1977, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I recently uploaded the xl2tpd package, which went into NEW. On my QA
> page [0], it gives a link [1] that returns a 404 error.
> [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/new/xl2tpd_1.1.11.dfsg.1-1_i386.html
Thats simply because those ~ajt/new files
On Fri, 03 Aug 2007, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Friday 3 August 2007 10:30, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> > It would be nice to be able to check reverse depends without an up to
> > date distribution installation. So please add reverse depends to the
> > packages.qa.d.o and/or packages.d.o sites.
>
>
Your message dated Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:24:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#431319: marked as done (uscan in
dehs broken?)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:24:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#431319: marked as done (uscan in
dehs broken?)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:24:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#431319: marked as done (uscan in
dehs broken?)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:24:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#431319: marked as done (uscan in
dehs broken?)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Fri, 3 Aug 2007 17:24:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Bug#431319: marked as done (uscan in
dehs broken?)]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Sorry for dsfg typo in regex, the Dehs version control code is on
svn.debian.org.
I attend the Justin and Thijs agree on a common patch to this function.
Please consider the debian general packages number situation and user
cases and not only packages that you maintain :)
Cheers,
Stefano
--
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> >
> > Still, a part of the bug here could still be addressed. What is needed is
> > to
> > scan for a dash from the end of the version string, and separate it there
> > into 'debian revision' and 'upstream'.
> >
> > E.g. this versio
On Friday 3 August 2007 16:48, Bluefuture wrote:
> This is actually the convertion function with regular expression:
>
> function vers_conv($debvers) {
> preg_match("/(.+:)?([^-]+)(ds|dsfg|debian)/",$debvers,$matches);
I would change "dsfg" to "dfsg" :-)
But for the rest... I've just reimpl
>
> Still, a part of the bug here could still be addressed. What is needed is to
> scan for a dash from the end of the version string, and separate it there
> into 'debian revision' and 'upstream'.
>
> E.g. this version number:
> 1.4.6-20060409-1
> should be split in upstream '1.4.6-20060409' a
>
> Still, a part of the bug here could still be addressed. What is needed is to
> scan for a dash from the end of the version string, and separate it there
> into 'debian revision' and 'upstream'.
>
> E.g. this version number:
> 1.4.6-20060409-1
> should be split in upstream '1.4.6-20060409'
Hi,
* Bluefuture <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-03 15:03]:
> > No it's not, have a look at
> > http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=fetchmail
> > Cheers
> > Nico
>
> It is not an alioth or dehs problem is a berlios one.
> Have u never tried to whet wget
> http://developer.berlios.de/pr
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 01:45, Bluefuture wrote:
> We need to have more statistical data about debian and upstream strange
> version numbering to do a better comparison. For example there is no
> standard way to cvs and svn version naming in debian.
Still, a part of the bug here could still be add
> No it's not, have a look at
> http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=fetchmail
> Cheers
> Nico
It is not an alioth or dehs problem is a berlios one.
Have u never tried to whet wget
http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=1824 from an
alioth account?
Problably berl
On Friday 3 August 2007 00:22, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> I recently uploaded the xl2tpd package, which went into NEW. On my QA
> page [0], it gives a link [1] that returns a 404 error.
This link is now there. I guess the problem is that that page is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 431319
Bug#431319: uscan in dehs broken?
Bug#295374: ddpo: watch/uscan is not running and/or doesn't show results
Bug#356042: qa.debian.org: watch column broken, completely no results for any
package
Bug#431265: developer.php: watch column outda
On Friday 3 August 2007 10:30, Adriaan Peeters wrote:
> It would be nice to be able to check reverse depends without an up to
> date distribution installation. So please add reverse depends to the
> packages.qa.d.o and/or packages.d.o sites.
I've been thinking about this before and I definately th
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to be able to check reverse depends without an up to
date distribution installation. So please add reverse depends to the
packages.qa.d.o and/or packages.d.o sites.
Thanks,
--
Adriaan Peeters
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
21 matches
Mail list logo
