Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

2007-12-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:17:39AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Let's do this. Let's standardize on: > Ok, cool. Many thanks! > I'll implement the convention PTS side, let me know when the new scheme > is read on the lintian side. I'll sneak th

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

2007-12-04 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:17:39AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Let's do this. Let's standardize on: Ok, cool. Many thanks! I'll implement the convention PTS side, let me know when the new scheme is read on the lintian side. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ..

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

2007-12-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:42:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> I do, although I'd like to reorganize more than that too. For example, >> right now everything is written to one giant directory, which isn't a >> good idea. It would also be nice to

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

2007-12-04 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 06:18:28PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > What my patches actually do is switch to an email address-based naming (in > everywhere: lintian reports generator, developer.php and PTS). > As for what I understood that's what you want to do, am I mistaken? No, you're not. It's

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks

2007-12-04 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:42:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > If you like the email based approach I've mentioned in my former post > > and point please let me know, I would happy to contribute a patch for > > that. > I do, although I'd like to reorganize more than that too. For example, > rig