setcd_1.5-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
setcd_1.5-5.dsc
setcd_1.5-5.diff.gz
setcd_1.5-5_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Accepted:
setcd_1.5-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/setcd/setcd_1.5-5.diff.gz
setcd_1.5-5.dsc
to pool/main/s/setcd/setcd_1.5-5.dsc
setcd_1.5-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/s/setcd/setcd_1.5-5_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
setcd_1.5-5.dsc - source utils
setcd_1.5-5_i386.deb - optional
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#455321: fixed in setcd 1.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
the documentation
into voluntary
by your IFA (the Firm) in
is more good,
own thing,
would worry if
He's also phasing
talking on cell phones
significant others while
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
En caso de no poder ver correctamente este correo favor de dar clic aquí
Felipe Moreno
LUNES NEGRO PARA LA DEMOCRACIA MEXICANA
Día lunes 10 de diciembre de 2007
La Comisión de Gobernación de la H. Cámara de Diputados ignora impugnaciones y
propuestas ciudadanas. 4000 ciudadanos fueron
le_1.13.4-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
le_1.13.4-2.dsc
le_1.13.4-2.diff.gz
le_1.13.4-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
libbinio_1.4-8_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libbinio_1.4-8.dsc
libbinio_1.4-8.diff.gz
libbinio1ldbl_1.4-8_alpha.deb
libbinio-dev_1.4-8_alpha.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Accepted:
le_1.13.4-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/le/le_1.13.4-2.diff.gz
le_1.13.4-2.dsc
to pool/main/l/le/le_1.13.4-2.dsc
le_1.13.4-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/le/le_1.13.4-2_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
le_1.13.4-2.dsc - source editors
le_1.13.4-2_i386.deb - optional editors
libbinio-dev_1.4-8_alpha.deb
to pool/main/libb/libbinio/libbinio-dev_1.4-8_alpha.deb
(new) libbinio1ldbl_1.4-8_alpha.deb optional libs
binary I/O stream class library
The binary I/O stream class library presents a platform-independent way to
access binary data streams in C++. The library is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 454964 libbinio
Bug#454964: adplug - FTBFS: undefined reference to
`binostream::writeFloat(__float128, binio::FType)'
Bug reassigned from package `adplug' to `libbinio'.
forcemerge 430247 454964
Bug#430247: ldbl128 transition for alpha,
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:32:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#449348: fixed in le 1.13.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:32:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#295955: fixed in le 1.13.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 454964 libbinio
forcemerge 430247 454964
thanks
This is actually a case of breakage in the underlying libbinio library,
which has never been properly updated for the ldbl128 ABI transition.
Ironically, shortly after the adplug build failure, libbinio was orphaned,
which means it was
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
reassign 430247 libbinio
Bug#430247: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390
Bug reassigned from package `libbinio-dev' to `libbinio'.
forcemerge 432047 454964
Bug#432047:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
forcemerge 430247 454964
Bug#430247: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390
Bug#454964: adplug - FTBFS: undefined reference to
`binostream::writeFloat(__float128,
Am Sonntag, den 09.12.2007, 15:39 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
[docbook-defguide ITA]
Have you made some progress on this stuff?
Ok, so this is JFTR. After a long night, most of the work is done (maybe
around 70%):
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 04:20:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please apply this patches to remove the .la files.
You know, sometimes it's helpful to include a reason for a change.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Accepted:
tilp_6.80-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tilp/tilp_6.80-5.diff.gz
tilp_6.80-5.dsc
to pool/main/t/tilp/tilp_6.80-5.dsc
tilp_6.80-5_amd64.deb
to pool/main/t/tilp/tilp_6.80-5_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
tilp_6.80-5.dsc - source math
tilp_6.80-5_amd64.deb - optional math
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#416341: fixed in tilp 6.80-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#432430: fixed in tilp 6.80-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tilp_6.80-5_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tilp_6.80-5.dsc
tilp_6.80-5.diff.gz
tilp_6.80-5_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
dfm_0.99.9-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dfm_0.99.9-2.dsc
dfm_0.99.9-2.diff.gz
dfm_0.99.9-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Accepted:
dfm_0.99.9-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dfm/dfm_0.99.9-2.diff.gz
dfm_0.99.9-2.dsc
to pool/main/d/dfm/dfm_0.99.9-2.dsc
dfm_0.99.9-2_amd64.deb
to pool/main/d/dfm/dfm_0.99.9-2_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
dfm_0.99.9-2.dsc - source x11
dfm_0.99.9-2_amd64.deb - optional
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:32:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#442541: fixed in dfm 0.99.9-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
The Canadian Subsidy Directory 2007 updated edition is now available.
Over 3200 Canadian Subsidies, Grants or Loans listed.
Cd-Rom..$ 69.95
Printed + free cd...$ 149.95
Canadian Publications
Toll free 1-866-322-3376, local 1-819-322-5756
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
#
tags 337828 pending
Bug#337828: ITP: libjogl-java -- Java bindings for OpenGL
There were no tags set.
Bug#456177: ITP: libjogl-java -- Java bindings for OpenGL API (java library)
Tags added: pending
Package: qc-usb-source
Version: 0.6.6-2
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Trying to build qc-usb against kernel 2.6.24-rc5-git3 fails with the
following error message:
mkdir -p /tmp/pkg/modules/qc-usb-source/.tmp_versions ; rm -f
le_1.13.5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
le_1.13.5-1.dsc
le_1.13.5.orig.tar.gz
le_1.13.5-1.diff.gz
le_1.13.5-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Accepted:
le_1.13.5-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/le/le_1.13.5-1.diff.gz
le_1.13.5-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/le/le_1.13.5-1.dsc
le_1.13.5-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/l/le/le_1.13.5-1_amd64.deb
le_1.13.5.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/le/le_1.13.5.orig.tar.gz
Override entries for your package:
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 07:02:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338110: fixed in le 1.13.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
tags 456294 + confirmed
thanks
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:52:19PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
The PTS has a link to svnbuildstat for every package now, which is quite
useful for the listed packages. However, the link does not provide useful
information for non-svnbuildstat-listed packages.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 456294 + confirmed
Bug#456294: PTS: please make svnbuildstat link conditional
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Dear QA and Lintian people,
While observing the lintian sources, I observed that Dep.pm has hard
coded package names for all the obsolete, essential packages etc. I
was wondering, why are these lists not generated at runtime? One
reason could be that I can't trust that the source of the data on
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
When I go to http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mantycomaint=no I see
not only my packages but also those for which I'm only listed as an uploader
like those of the voip team.
Seems that the comaint=no has stopped working.
Regards...
-- System
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While observing the lintian sources, I observed that Dep.pm has hard
coded package names for all the obsolete, essential packages etc. I was
wondering, why are these lists not generated at runtime? One reason
could be that I can't trust that the source
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:59:50 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#453705: PTS says wrongly package has new bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:23:16 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269493
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:08:32 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: Debian Bug report logs is lax
about bogus package names.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:13:21 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#455214: qa.debian.org: add a usercategory for svnbuildstat
on the qa.debian.org BTS pseudo package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:23:16 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#269493
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:14:38 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452323: developer.php DM-Upload-Allowed field
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 437675 pending
Bug#437675: Seems, the watch handler is not able to handle mangles in wath files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
severity 437675 wishlist
Bug#437675: Seems, the watch handler is not able to handle mangles in wath files
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:29:43 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line developer.php: merge watch and wwiz columns
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tag 437675 pending
severity 437675 wishlist
retitle 437675 Compare versions using the mangled Debian version string
thanks
The code on developer.php/.wml has been updated so this feature can be
integrated.
What is left is update the DEHS backend including the database structure,
afterwards an
Russ Allbery wrote:
Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In particular, if some package enters or leaves a black/whitelist,
wouldn't a new lintian version be warranted in the current scheme of
things?
Yes. If there are significant packages that become obsolete and warrant a
lintian
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Yes. If there are significant packages that become obsolete and
warrant a lintian warning to aid in a transition, please file a
wishlist bug against lintian and we'll include that check in the next
release.
debcheck is available for
Russ Allbery wrote:
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Yes. If there are significant packages that become obsolete and
warrant a lintian warning to aid in a transition, please file a
wishlist bug against lintian and we'll include that check in the next
release.
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, libglib1.2ldbl, libgtk1.2 and maybe libgd2-xpm would qualify to be
included?
Do you want me to file a bug to include them or is mentioning them over
here enough?
Could you explain more why that would be? For the first two, do you think
there are
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, libglib1.2ldbl, libgtk1.2 and maybe libgd2-xpm would qualify to be
included?
libgd2-xpm isn't even in oldlibs and there's no hint in the package
description that it shouldn't be used. Is it really being phased out?
--
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 16/12/2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
So, libglib1.2ldbl, libgtk1.2 and maybe libgd2-xpm would qualify to be
included?
libgd2-xpm isn't even in oldlibs and there's no hint in the package
description that it shouldn't be used. Is it really being phased out?
I am unsure about this, as the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 452905 !
Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: Debian Bug report logs is lax about bogus package
names.
Bug reopened, originator set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
reopen 452905 !
thanks
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:27:13 +
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Namely, that BTS pages for bogus names can be accessed:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=Microsoft%20Windows%20Vista;dist=unstable
I don't see a bug here.
Just
52 matches
Mail list logo
