Your message dated Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:47:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#135296: fixed in docbook-defguide 2.0.17+svn7549-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:47:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#280740: fixed in docbook-defguide 2.0.17+svn7549-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:47:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#257715: fixed in docbook-defguide 2.0.17+svn7549-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:47:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#173710: fixed in docbook-defguide 2.0.17+svn7549-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:47:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#208031: fixed in docbook-defguide 2.0.17+svn7549-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:47:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#280485: fixed in docbook-defguide 2.0.17+svn7549-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:47:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#248364: fixed in docbook-defguide 2.0.17+svn7549-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Уроки aнглийского. (в Москве)
Уроки ведет автор методики.
Научим Вас не только говорить, но и думать на английском языке.
Грамматика станет для Вас ясной и понятной.
Даже, если Вы боитесь, что Вы - это тяжелый случай, - позвоните и просто
попробуйте.
Возможен выезд к Вам.
Стоимость 1
Уроки aнглийского. (в Москве)
Уроки ведет автор методики.
Научим Вас не только говорить, но и думать на английском языке.
Грамматика станет ясной и понятной.
Даже, если Вы боитесь, что Вы - это тяжелый случай, - позвоните и просто
попробуйте.
Выезд возможен.
Стоимость 1 ак. час (45 минут)
Package: klineakconfig
Version: 0.9-6
Severity: grave
I just tried to configure my Compaq notebook with
klineakconfig. Starting it the first time I get a message about creating an
initial configuration on my terminal but no window appears. When I stop
it with Ctrl+C a small Window appears, asking
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
So, should the bug be closed?
No, the bug report is against the debian package. It was specifically
encountered in the mailping 0.0.4-1 package from lenny, but also appears
to affects etch (0.0.4-0.1) package as well.I've attached a patch
that seems to address
!!!Хорватия без посредников!!!
Квартиры, Участки,Дома. Побережье от 90 OOO. Внутренние районы от 30 00O евро.
Бизнес под ключ - 16OO евро.
ВНЖ. ПМЖ. Конфиденциальность. Гарантии.
Внимание! С 2009 года граждане ЕС получат преимущество и смогут покупать
недвижимость в Хорватии как физические
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 02:54:43PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
It looks like the PTS is replacing - with _, which is breaking some
lintian links. See zoneminder, for example.
I've just fixed the XSL to avoid escaping '-' as a quick fix. I haven't
yet regenerated the pages though.
The list of
retitle 373218 naming convention for lintian URLs is not in sync with
lintian.d.o
thanks
With the new lintian.d.o naming convention [1], this bug should be way
better now, since now URLs are email based and way less characters that
need escaping are present there.
Instead of closing the bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 373218 naming convention for lintian URLs is not in sync with
lintian.d.o
Bug#373218: PTS: wrong link to lintian page
Changed Bug title to `naming convention for lintian URLs is not in sync with
lintian.d.o' from `PTS: wrong link to lintian
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 07:35:48PM +, tim hall wrote:
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Its in no way important, not even near to it. Its priority extra, so
lowest possible priority.
Sorry, wrong terminology. It's a very useful multimedia application, which
many people use and would expect to find
Hi,
Sorry, wrong terminology. It's a very useful multimedia application,
which many people use and would expect to find in Debian. Therefore it
is worth making the extra effort to keep it well maintained IMO. The
point being that debian-multimedia should deal with it if group
maintenance is
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: pts
Dear PTS maintainers,
Please consider displaying a swirl in the PTS webpages, along with the
Debian logo. In fact, itd do fine even if you forget about the word
Debian and just put a logo there.
I tried my best to find
On 2007-12-23, Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, wrong terminology. It's a very useful multimedia application,
which many people use and would expect to find in Debian. Therefore it
is worth making the extra effort to keep it well maintained IMO. The
point being that
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hope this helps. Also, in case you do file oldlib transition bugs,
please try to adhere to the usertags I have used, or tell me the bug
numbers, and I can usertag them.
Half a year ago I filed bugs against packages still using freetype1.
20 matches
Mail list logo