Processing of postman_2.1-5_i386.changes

postman_2.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: postman_2.1-5.dsc postman_2.1-5.diff.gz postman_2.1-5_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

postman_2.1-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: postman_2.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/p/postman/postman_2.1-5.diff.gz postman_2.1-5.dsc to pool/main/p/postman/postman_2.1-5.dsc postman_2.1-5_i386.deb to pool/main/p/postman/postman_2.1-5_i386.deb Override entries for your package: postman_2.1-5.dsc - source web

emifreq-applet_0.18-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: emifreq-applet_0.18-4.diff.gz to pool/main/e/emifreq-applet/emifreq-applet_0.18-4.diff.gz emifreq-applet_0.18-4.dsc to pool/main/e/emifreq-applet/emifreq-applet_0.18-4.dsc emifreq-applet_0.18-4_i386.deb to pool/main/e/emifreq-applet/emifreq-applet_0.18-4_i386.deb Override

Processed: severity of 462280 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13 severity 462280 important Bug#462280: newbiedoc: should this package be removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processing of sn_0.3.8-7_i386.changes

sn_0.3.8-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sn_0.3.8-7.dsc sn_0.3.8-7.diff.gz sn_0.3.8-7_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Processing of kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2_i386.changes

kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2.dsc kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2.diff.gz kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

sn_0.3.8-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: sn_0.3.8-7.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sn/sn_0.3.8-7.diff.gz sn_0.3.8-7.dsc to pool/main/s/sn/sn_0.3.8-7.dsc sn_0.3.8-7_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sn/sn_0.3.8-7_i386.deb Override entries for your package: sn_0.3.8-7.dsc - source news sn_0.3.8-7_i386.deb - optional news Announcing to

kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kxgenerator/kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2.diff.gz kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2.dsc to pool/main/k/kxgenerator/kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2.dsc kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kxgenerator/kxgenerator_0.3.7+dfsg-2_i386.deb

Processing of gtkpbbuttons_0.6.9-2_powerpc.changes

gtkpbbuttons_0.6.9-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gtkpbbuttons_0.6.9-2.dsc gtkpbbuttons_0.6.9-2.diff.gz gtkpbbuttons-common_0.6.9-2_all.deb gtkpbbuttons_0.6.9-2_powerpc.deb gtkpbbuttons-gnome_0.6.9-2_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian

Processing of powerprefs_0.5.1-2_powerpc.changes

powerprefs_0.5.1-2_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: powerprefs_0.5.1-2.dsc powerprefs_0.5.1-2.diff.gz powerprefs_0.5.1-2_powerpc.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

powerprefs_0.5.1-2_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: powerprefs_0.5.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/powerprefs/powerprefs_0.5.1-2.diff.gz powerprefs_0.5.1-2.dsc to pool/main/p/powerprefs/powerprefs_0.5.1-2.dsc powerprefs_0.5.1-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/p/powerprefs/powerprefs_0.5.1-2_powerpc.deb Override entries for your package:

gtkpbbuttons_0.6.9-2_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gtkpbbuttons-common_0.6.9-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gtkpbbuttons/gtkpbbuttons-common_0.6.9-2_all.deb gtkpbbuttons-gnome_0.6.9-2_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gtkpbbuttons/gtkpbbuttons-gnome_0.6.9-2_powerpc.deb gtkpbbuttons_0.6.9-2.diff.gz to

Processing of opensched_0.4.4-6_i386.changes

opensched_0.4.4-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: opensched_0.4.4-6.dsc opensched_0.4.4-6.diff.gz opensched_0.4.4-6_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

opensched_0.4.4-6_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: opensched_0.4.4-6.diff.gz to pool/main/o/opensched/opensched_0.4.4-6.diff.gz opensched_0.4.4-6.dsc to pool/main/o/opensched/opensched_0.4.4-6.dsc opensched_0.4.4-6_i386.deb to pool/main/o/opensched/opensched_0.4.4-6_i386.deb Override entries for your package:

Bug#417463: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:17:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#417463: fixed in opensched 0.4.4-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Processing of libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3_i386.changes

libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.diff.gz libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.diff.gz libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc to pool/main/liba/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3_i386.deb to

libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2 override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3_i386.deb: package says section is web, override says net. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and

Bug#462684: [INTL:fi] Finnish translation of the debconf templates

Package: htdig Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Please include attached translation fi.po to the package. Regards, Esko Arajärvi msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: htdig\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] POT-Creation-Date: 2008-01-20 14:11+0100\n PO-Revision-Date: 2008-01-26

cynthiune.app 0.9.5-7 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the cynthiune.app source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.9.5-7 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more

updating debian's tDOM package

Hi, The (orphaned) tDOM package in debian is pretty old, so I've built an updated version for my own use and that of others in the OpenACS (http://openacs.org/) community. What's the process for getting this accepted into the debian archives? cheers Russell Muetzelfeldt [EMAIL

Processing of libgtk-perl_0.7009-14_i386.changes

libgtk-perl_0.7009-14_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libgtk-perl_0.7009-14.dsc libgtk-perl_0.7009-14.diff.gz libgtk-perl_0.7009-14_i386.deb libgtk-imlib-perl_0.7009-14_i386.deb libgdk-pixbuf-perl_0.7009-14_i386.deb libgnome-perl_0.7009-14_i386.deb

libgtk-perl_0.7009-14_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libgdk-pixbuf-perl_0.7009-14_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgtk-perl/libgdk-pixbuf-perl_0.7009-14_i386.deb libgladexml-perl_0.7009-14_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgtk-perl/libgladexml-perl_0.7009-14_i386.deb libgnome-perl_0.7009-14_i386.deb to

Re: simpleparse

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:47:50PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: Hi ! python-simpleparse has two annoying bugs: http://bugs.debian.org/426429 http://bugs.debian.org/357537 Both of them is solved by a new upstream version. The last upload by the maintainer is from 2005?[1]. This is

Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Moreover, and that's the main point of this report, it seems that the last time the clash happened was January 2006, no other clashes in 2007 nor 2008. Is it possible that the issue has been solved elsewhere and the clash no

Bug#462627: PTS: don't show empty uploaders field

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Please don't show the Uploaders field when it is empty. Examples: http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers.html http://packages.qa.debian.org/n/nsis.html -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is

Re: simpleparse

OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du samedi 26 janvier 2008, vers 05:23, Seo Sanghyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait: Therefore, I'd like to request to orphan this package. I would then adopt it and maintain it inside Debian Python Modules Team. You are right. I am sorry. Consider

Bug#462627: PTS: don't show empty uploaders field

user [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertag 462627 + pts thanks On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 06:46:32PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: Please don't show the Uploaders field when it is empty. I think in the beginning this was intentional (see the markup for the None string to convince yourself of this :-) ). However

Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Moreover, and that's the main point of this report, it seems that the last time the clash happened was January 2006, no other clashes in 2007 nor 2008. Is it possible that the

Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news

On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Note that this behaviour should be fixed. It happens that dak send several Accepted mails during the same second for example when the package gets out of NEW and when several upload happened while the package was sitting in NEW.

Re: RFS: QA Uploads

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:57:12PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: I think I finally got it right. At least it display OK for me and lintian is happy now. I've put a new one on mentors. Uploaded Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: RFS: QA Uploads

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 09:37:17PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: New one one mentors. Uploaded Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: QA Uploads

On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc Fairly intrusive but makes it build and fixes 2 important bugs. debdiff between the old and new binary: File lists identical

Re: RFS: QA Uploads

On 26/01/2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:01:22PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2/libapache2-mod-xmlrpc2_2.2.1-3.dsc Fairly intrusive but makes it build and fixes 2 important bugs. debdiff between the

Bug#457152: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Accurately represent Bugs/Patches available in the Todo section of PTS page)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:05:23 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line qa.debian.org: Accurately represent Bugs/Patches available in the Todo has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#457759: PTS: bug summary counts bugs that are assigned to two or more packages more than once

On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:13:56 +0100, Frank S. Thomas wrote: If one bug is assigned to two or more binary packages of the same source package, the PTS' Bugs count summary counts this bug more than once. This summary should only count bugs in the source package. The DDPO does this right, compare

Bug#356776: marked as done (PTS: lingering new upstream version todo)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:34:26 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line PTS: lingering new upstream version todo has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#367098: marked as done (PTS: bug summary should not count merged bugs twice)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:40:10 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line invalid, would induce a different meaning of summary than bts has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#433933: marked as done (should not complain about ITPs of packages which are only in experimental)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:46:36 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line should not complain about ITPs of packages which are only in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#457759: PTS: bug summary counts bugs that are assigned to two or more packages more than once

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:13:56 +0100, Frank S. Thomas wrote: If one bug is assigned to two or more binary packages of the same source package, the PTS' Bugs count summary counts this bug more than once. This summary should only count bugs in the

Bug#354307: packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydsn.html has weird sorted news

On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Note that this behaviour should be fixed. It happens that dak send several Accepted mails during the same second for example when the package gets out of NEW and when several