dict-jargon_4.4.4-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dict-jargon_4.4.4-7.dsc
dict-jargon_4.4.4-7.diff.gz
dict-jargon_4.4.4-7_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Accepted:
dict-jargon_4.4.4-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dict-jargon/dict-jargon_4.4.4-7.diff.gz
dict-jargon_4.4.4-7.dsc
to pool/main/d/dict-jargon/dict-jargon_4.4.4-7.dsc
dict-jargon_4.4.4-7_all.deb
to pool/main/d/dict-jargon/dict-jargon_4.4.4-7_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4.dsc
ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4.diff.gz
ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
libggigcp_1.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libggigcp_1.0.1+dfsg1-1.dsc
libggigcp_1.0.1+dfsg1.orig.tar.gz
libggigcp_1.0.1+dfsg1-1.diff.gz
libggigcp1_1.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb
libggigcp1-dev_1.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your
Accepted:
ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/ggi-doc/ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4.diff.gz
ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4.dsc
to pool/main/g/ggi-doc/ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4.dsc
ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4_all.deb
to pool/main/g/ggi-doc/ggi-doc_0.0.20040308-4_all.deb
Override entries for your
Accepted:
libggigcp1-dev_1.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libggigcp/libggigcp1-dev_1.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb
libggigcp1_1.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libggigcp/libggigcp1_1.0.1+dfsg1-1_i386.deb
libggigcp_1.0.1+dfsg1-1.diff.gz
to
libggimisc_2.2.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libggimisc_2.2.1-3.dsc
libggimisc_2.2.1-3.diff.gz
libggimisc2_2.2.1-3_i386.deb
libggimisc2-dev_2.2.1-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
libggiwmh_0.3.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libggiwmh_0.3.1-3.dsc
libggiwmh_0.3.1-3.diff.gz
libggiwmh0_0.3.1-3_i386.deb
libggiwmh0-dev_0.3.1-3_i386.deb
libggiwmh0-target-x_0.3.1-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
Accepted:
libggimisc2-dev_2.2.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libggimisc/libggimisc2-dev_2.2.1-3_i386.deb
libggimisc2_2.2.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libggimisc/libggimisc2_2.2.1-3_i386.deb
libggimisc_2.2.1-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/libg/libggimisc/libggimisc_2.2.1-3.diff.gz
Accepted:
libggiwmh0-dev_0.3.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libggiwmh/libggiwmh0-dev_0.3.1-3_i386.deb
libggiwmh0-target-x_0.3.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libggiwmh/libggiwmh0-target-x_0.3.1-3_i386.deb
libggiwmh0_0.3.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libg/libggiwmh/libggiwmh0_0.3.1-3_i386.deb
Your email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject
Spam:**, We caught you naked jjkson has been
blocked by the Friends system. [EMAIL PROTECTED] only accepts email from
people on a list of approved senders to minimize spam, you are not currently on
Bitte nicht mehr an diese Adresse schreiben!
Die neuen Adresse finden Sie auf meiner Internetpräsenz!
www.go4go.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message that you sent to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has not yet been delivered:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Your Coupon #WqTPr. Cyalsi , Vyarga nad eLvytra
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:20:29 +
I am now using Vanquish to avoid spam. This automated message
is an optional feature of that
takBBS ResTypeお知らせメールです。
貴方の投稿は以下の理由により正常に処理されませんでした。お手数ですがエラー内容をご確認の上再度送信してください。
理由:
添付ファイルの取得に失敗しました。添付されたfileの形式は対応していない可能性があります
-
takumi
http://www.wtakumi.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sqlrelay_0.39.4-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
sqlrelay_0.39.4-2.dsc
sqlrelay_0.39.4-2.diff.gz
sqlrelay-doc_0.39.4-2_all.deb
zope-sqlrelayda_0.39.4-2_all.deb
libdbd-sqlrelay-perl_0.39.4-2_all.deb
sqlrelay_0.39.4-2_amd64.deb
Accepted:
libdbd-sqlrelay-perl_0.39.4-2_all.deb
to pool/main/s/sqlrelay/libdbd-sqlrelay-perl_0.39.4-2_all.deb
libfirstworks-sqlr-perl_0.39.4-2_amd64.deb
to pool/main/s/sqlrelay/libfirstworks-sqlr-perl_0.39.4-2_amd64.deb
libsqlrelay-0.39_0.39.4-2_amd64.deb
to
Je serai absent(e) du Ven 14/03/2008 au Lun 01/12/2008.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. En cas d'urgence, n'hésitez pas à
appeler l'agence au 01.60.42.11.00 ou à tranférer votre message à Keren
PARTOUCHE ou Denis RAVEYRE
Cordialement
Ensemble adoptons des gestes responsables :
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 472988 UTF-8 Web pages result in strange characters, recode
Bug#472988: (no subject)
Changed Bug title to `UTF-8 Web pages result in strange characters, recode'
from `(no subject)'.
to latin1 works
Unknown command or malformed arguments to
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 03:40:32AM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
Chris Lamb wrote:
The attached file is the diff for my oleo 1.99.16-11 QA upload.
I just realised I missed bug #477575 (copyright incomplete, any license for
afm/* files?, filed yesterday) which should be fixed before any upload
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:56:47AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Yes, I think so, but it's not clear when debcheck or edos-debcheck
should be the recommended tool.
FWIW, I don't know if debcheck has a main page, but the various EDOS
tools have one (http://edos.debian.net) and a few days ago I
In case someone it looking for an easy QA task, here is some suggestion:
Search for packages that are configured or built twice in the buildds.
Theory: The buildds first build the software my telling the debian/rules
makefile to create the target build (hopefully in some future
build-arch) and
On 26/04/08 at 13:36 +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
In case someone it looking for an easy QA task, here is some suggestion:
Search for packages that are configured or built twice in the buildds.
Theory: The buildds first build the software my telling the debian/rules
makefile to create the
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
Hi all,
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:07:11 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
I've asked an upstream author how he thinks of this issue
and if I get any response, I'll report it here.
I got a reply from the upstream author today. He said
that he updated dvi2ps so
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mmh, wouldn't it be possible to analyze build logs and search for two
(or more) occurences of the same text? I can provide build logs for
all packages in Debian if someone is interested. Is there a tool doing
this
On 26/04/08 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In december, I worked a bit on the QA website[1]. I did some more work
on that, using the CSS already used for the PTS and for
release.debian.org.
I'd like to see
On 26/04/08 at 17:48 +0800, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:56:47AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Yes, I think so, but it's not clear when debcheck or edos-debcheck
should be the recommended tool.
FWIW, I don't know if debcheck has a main page, but the various EDOS
On 25/04/08 at 14:35 +0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
http://qa.debian.org/~lucas/bapase/bugs_rm_pkgs.txt (updated every 6 hours).
This script lists bugs that:
- are not marked as done
- don't affect testing, unstable or experimental
- don't belong to a package in testing, unstable or
On 25/04/08 at 15:07 +0700, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-16 14:31]:
In december, I worked a bit on the QA website[1]. I did some more
work on that, using the CSS already used for the PTS and for
release.debian.org. The result can be viewed on
On 26/04/08 at 11:42 +0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
One more question: there's a currently an email alias which receives a
message for each package that is removed from Debian. Are you
interested in receiving these emails, or should we get rid of it?
The email alias should probably be kept.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:23:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/04/08 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In december, I worked a bit on the QA website[1]. I did some more work
on that, using the CSS
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The gain is not worth the poorer appearance to me.
Perhaps a different colour would be better? Something like this maybe:
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=mancala
If not, no big deal, I'll add
* Lucas Nussbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-26 19:17]:
Do you think you could add one optional step to bugs_rm_pkgs.rb:
exclude all bugs from packages that are listed in the removals.txt
file. You could generate a file bugs_unknown_pkgs.txt and then I
could go through them.
Is there a
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:53:22PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The gain is not worth the poorer appearance to me.
Perhaps a different colour would be better? Something like this maybe:
On 26/04/08 at 11:43 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:23:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/04/08 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In december, I worked a bit on the QA
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 08:33:55PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/04/08 at 11:43 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 07:23:38PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/04/08 at 10:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
[EMAIL
Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
Hi,
just annoyed by repeated cron files output from removed packages I
implemented a
new test for packages: no output from cron files of removed packages.
The interesting bit is here:
http://qa.debian.org/~filippo/crontest/20070801-crontest.log
the log format
On 26/04/08 at 12:28 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:53:22PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The gain is not worth the poorer appearance to me.
Perhaps a different colour would be
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:06:34PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The problem with such style changes is that when people are used to
something, the new style always look ugly. I even considered the new PTS
layout ugly in the beginning.
For this change, I think that collapsed borders look
On 11367 March 1977, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Do you think you could add one optional step to bugs_rm_pkgs.rb:
exclude all bugs from packages that are listed in the removals.txt
file. You could generate a file bugs_unknown_pkgs.txt and then I
could go through them.
Is there a
Hi, all.
From: Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dvi2ps
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 10:59:41 -0400
OK folks I have built a package with the 4.1j version on the site. I'm
not super familiar with dvi2ps so any chance I could get some testers?
It would also be nice if Ohura could
40 matches
Mail list logo
