diald_0.99.4-9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
diald_0.99.4-9.dsc
diald_0.99.4-9.diff.gz
diald_0.99.4-9_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
diald_0.99.4-9.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/diald/diald_0.99.4-9.diff.gz
diald_0.99.4-9.dsc
to pool/main/d/diald/diald_0.99.4-9.dsc
diald_0.99.4-9_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/diald/diald_0.99.4-9_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
diald_0.99.4-9.dsc - source net
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#490616: fixed in diald 0.99.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #490616,
regarding diald: [INTL:fi] Finnish translation of the debconf templates
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#452949: fixed in diald 0.99.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #452949,
regarding [INTL:nl] Dutch po-debconf translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#490197: fixed in diald 0.99.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #490197,
regarding [INTL:eu] Basque translation for diald debconf template
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#489878: fixed in diald 0.99.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #489878,
regarding diald: [INTL:vi] Vietnamese debconf templates translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#490342: fixed in diald 0.99.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #490342,
regarding diald: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#487597: fixed in diald 0.99.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #487597,
regarding [INTL:sv] Swedish translation of debconf templates
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Why let bad potence spoil your nights. http://minf.doctorgoodsite.eu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: licq
Version: 1.3.4-2
Followup-For: Bug #488934
Hello,
this bug should be reopened, because bug 47 fixes only testnig and
not stable. I think the severity of this bug is high enough to be fixed
in proposed-updates and in the next point release of Etch.
-- System Information:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080713 03:09]:
Isn't just the first a special case, not all the rest?
Therefore all options should apply to all images and there should be
no -forall.
Each option only applied to the first image after the option.
So things like the following are
Hello good day ?!
I want to know, if KDE 4.0 already works with debian ?
For this cmake is necessary.
What should I do, and how should I obtain and install cmake ?
It is not included in debian-dvds ???
What should I do next to install KDE 4.0 ???
About what should I take care of by that ???
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:05:36PM +0200, Vladislav Kurz wrote:
Package: licq
Version: 1.3.4-2
Followup-For: Bug #488934
Hello,
this bug should be reopened, because bug 47 fixes only testnig and
not stable. I think the severity of this bug is high enough to be fixed
in
Sie brauchen Arbeit?
Wir helfen Ihnen: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 13:44:33 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: PTS: bug summary counts bugs that are assigned to two or
more packages more than once
has caused the Debian Bug report #457759,
regarding PTS: bug summary counts bugs that are assigned to
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
the page http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ktechlab
states two wrong assertions, which I present below. Please take the time
to check the status of this package, and fix the wrong excuse items.
Here are the two wrong assertions:
1-
Georges Khaznadar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (13/07/2008):
Here are the two wrong assertions:
1- ktechlab (source, i386, alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, ia64, mips,
mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc) has new bugs!
The link points to
Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 18:17:58 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Re: Bug#490683: qa.debian.org: package ktechlab has no new bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #490683,
regarding qa.debian.org: package ktechlab has no new bugs
to be marked as done.
This
Package: gnus
Version: 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3
Severity: serious
This package should be orphaned, currently it has a two year old version of
the gnus development series (No Gnus). If the package goes to lenny it should
atleast have the latest No Gnus version.
I have not had any problems with No Gnus,
Mika Tiainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: gnus
Version: 5.11+v0.5.dfsg-3
Severity: serious
This package should be orphaned, currently it has a two year old version
of the gnus development series (No Gnus). If the package goes to lenny
it should atleast have the latest No Gnus
On 13 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
Mika Tiainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have not had any problems with No Gnus, but they are still
declared alpha versions, and maybe should be completely kept out of
stable. Both emacs and xemacs have the latest stable Gnus already
included.
This
Mika Tiainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 13 Jul 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
This package is useful for emacs21 users, as it's considerably newer
than what was included in emacs21. I agree that it's not useful for
emacs22 users (and indeed isn't installable if you only have emacs22
installed)
22 matches
Mail list logo
