kiosktool_1.0-2~etch+1_i386.changes INSTALLED into stable

Installing: kiosktool_1.0-2~etch+1.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kiosktool/kiosktool_1.0-2~etch+1.diff.gz kiosktool_1.0-2~etch+1.dsc to pool/main/k/kiosktool/kiosktool_1.0-2~etch+1.dsc kiosktool_1.0-2~etch+1_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kiosktool/kiosktool_1.0-2~etch+1_i386.deb Override entries for

Processing of rman_3.2-4_i386.changes

rman_3.2-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rman_3.2-4.dsc rman_3.2-4.diff.gz rman_3.2-4_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Processing of sdr_3.0-7_i386.changes

sdr_3.0-7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: sdr_3.0-7.dsc sdr_3.0-7.diff.gz sdr_3.0-7_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

licq_1.3.4-2etch1_i386.changes INSTALLED into stable

Installing: licq-dev_1.3.4-2etch1_all.deb to pool/main/l/licq/licq-dev_1.3.4-2etch1_all.deb licq-plugin-autoreply_1.3.4-2etch1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/licq/licq-plugin-autoreply_1.3.4-2etch1_i386.deb licq-plugin-console_1.3.4-2etch1_i386.deb to

Bug#488934: marked as done (licq: ICQ Protocal Changes: Unknown sign on error: 0x1C.)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:40:50 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#488934: fixed in licq 1.3.4-2etch1 has caused the Debian Bug report #488934, regarding licq: ICQ Protocal Changes: Unknown sign on error: 0x1C. to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#488887: marked as done (licq: can't login, error 0x1c)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:40:50 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#47: fixed in licq 1.3.4-2etch1 has caused the Debian Bug report #47, regarding licq: can't login, error 0x1c to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

libtk-img_1.3-15etch2_i386.changes INSTALLED into stable

Installing: libtk-img_1.3-15etch2.diff.gz to pool/main/libt/libtk-img/libtk-img_1.3-15etch2.diff.gz libtk-img_1.3-15etch2.dsc to pool/main/libt/libtk-img/libtk-img_1.3-15etch2.dsc libtk-img_1.3-15etch2_i386.deb to pool/main/libt/libtk-img/libtk-img_1.3-15etch2_i386.deb Override entries

Processed: setting package to gnochm, tagging 485300

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 # via tagpending # # gnochm (0.9.11-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * debian/control #- replaced Depends on python-gnome2-extras with python-gtkhtml2; thanks to #

Bug#485300: setting package to gnochm, tagging 485300

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 # via tagpending # # gnochm (0.9.11-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low # # * debian/control #- replaced Depends on python-gnome2-extras with python-gtkhtml2; thanks to # Josselin Mouette for the report; Closes: #485300 #

Processing of wmaker-usersguide_0.20.2-3_i386.changes

wmaker-usersguide_0.20.2-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: wmaker-usersguide_0.20.2-3.dsc wmaker-usersguide_0.20.2-3.diff.gz wmaker-usersguide-ps_0.20.2-3_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#393339: reproducible segfault in nstxd

retitle 393339 segfault in nstxd thanks On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 09:33:26AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: Package: nstx Version: 1.1-beta6-2.1 Severity: important I can reproduce this segfault: nstxd[15095]: segfault at rip +00402a1e rsp 7f8c6390

Processed: Re: Bug#393339: reproducible segfault in nstxd

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 393339 segfault in nstxd Bug#393339: reproducible segfault in nstxd Changed Bug title to `segfault in nstxd' from `reproducible segfault in nstxd'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#317786: nstx: init script doesn't report daemon start failure

On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 06:34:54AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: Package: nstx Version:1.1-beta6-2.1 The init script for nstxcd (and maybe nstxd?) fail to report if a start action is unsuccessful. The one repeatable case I've discovered to test this is that if there is no network interface up

Bug#405797: marked as done (gnochm: can't start)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:53:51 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: gnochm: can't start has caused the Debian Bug report #405797, regarding gnochm: can't start to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#430938: gnochm - crashes on loading CHM file

Hello, may you please try to replicate this bug with the version currently in sid/testing, 0.9.11-1? I tried it with some chm file and it works great (and I don't know where to find the problematic file you're referring to). Thanks, Sandro -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) My

Processed: found 491256 in 0.9.11-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 found 491256 0.9.11-1 Bug#491256: libchm1: some chm files sections are not rendered Bug marked as found in version 0.9.11-1. End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#425690: marked as done (gnochm: Files rendered with huge fonts)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:29:44 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: gnochm: Files rendered with huge fonts has caused the Debian Bug report #425690, regarding gnochm: Files rendered with huge fonts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

sdr_3.0-7_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: sdr_3.0-7.diff.gz to pool/main/s/sdr/sdr_3.0-7.diff.gz sdr_3.0-7.dsc to pool/main/s/sdr/sdr_3.0-7.dsc sdr_3.0-7_i386.deb to pool/main/s/sdr/sdr_3.0-7_i386.deb Override entries for your package: sdr_3.0-7.dsc - source net sdr_3.0-7_i386.deb - extra net Announcing to [EMAIL

wmaker-usersguide_0.20.2-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: wmaker-usersguide-ps_0.20.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/w/wmaker-usersguide/wmaker-usersguide-ps_0.20.2-3_all.deb wmaker-usersguide_0.20.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/w/wmaker-usersguide/wmaker-usersguide_0.20.2-3.diff.gz wmaker-usersguide_0.20.2-3.dsc to

rman_3.2-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: rman_3.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rman/rman_3.2-4.diff.gz rman_3.2-4.dsc to pool/main/r/rman/rman_3.2-4.dsc rman_3.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rman/rman_3.2-4_i386.deb Override entries for your package: rman_3.2-4.dsc - source text rman_3.2-4_i386.deb - optional text Announcing

Processing of gnochm_0.9.11-2_amd64.changes

gnochm_0.9.11-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnochm_0.9.11-2.dsc gnochm_0.9.11-2.diff.gz gnochm_0.9.11-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

gnochm_0.9.11-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: gnochm_0.9.11-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnochm/gnochm_0.9.11-2.diff.gz gnochm_0.9.11-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gnochm/gnochm_0.9.11-2.dsc gnochm_0.9.11-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnochm/gnochm_0.9.11-2_all.deb Override entries for your package: gnochm_0.9.11-2.dsc - source gnome

Bug#485300: marked as done (Please depend on python-gtkhtml instead of python-gnome2-extras)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:17:08 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#485300: fixed in gnochm 0.9.11-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #485300, regarding Please depend on python-gtkhtml instead of python-gnome2-extras to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#492481: gnochm: build-depend on autotools-dev

Package: gnochm Version: 0.9.11-2 Severity: minor Hello, please build-depend on autotools-dev so to remove lintian errors: E: gnochm source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.guess 2003-06-17 E: gnochm source: outdated-autotools-helper-file config.sub 2003-06-18 Thanks, Sandro -- System

Processing of adesklets_0.6.1-3_i386.changes

adesklets_0.6.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: adesklets_0.6.1-3.dsc adesklets_0.6.1-3.diff.gz adesklets_0.6.1-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

adesklets_0.6.1-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: adesklets_0.6.1-3.diff.gz to pool/main/a/adesklets/adesklets_0.6.1-3.diff.gz adesklets_0.6.1-3.dsc to pool/main/a/adesklets/adesklets_0.6.1-3.dsc adesklets_0.6.1-3_i386.deb to pool/main/a/adesklets/adesklets_0.6.1-3_i386.deb Override entries for your package:

Processing of cmatrix_1.2a-3_i386.changes

cmatrix_1.2a-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cmatrix_1.2a-3.dsc cmatrix_1.2a-3.diff.gz cmatrix-xfont_1.2a-3_all.deb cmatrix_1.2a-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#430938: gnochm - crashes on loading CHM file

It is more than year since I reported original bug. I don't have access to that CHM file anymore, so I can't reproduce this bug. Consider closed due to lack of evidence. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of cmatrix_1.2a-3_i386.changes

cmatrix_1.2a-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cmatrix_1.2a-3.dsc cmatrix_1.2a-3.diff.gz cmatrix-xfont_1.2a-3_all.deb cmatrix_1.2a-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Bug#430938: marked as done (gnochm - crashes on loading CHM file)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:06:27 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: Bug#430938: gnochm - crashes on loading CHM file has caused the Debian Bug report #430938, regarding gnochm - crashes on loading CHM file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

cmatrix_1.2a-3_i386.changes REJECTED

Rejected: cmatrix_1.2a-3_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in the Accepted directory. Rejected: cmatrix-xfont_1.2a-3_all.deb file already exists in the Accepted directory. Rejected: cmatrix_1.2a-3.diff.gz file already exists in the Accepted directory. Rejected:

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: pyblosxom: minimize number of items on front space to stop planet-spamming

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 373658 tags - patch Unknown tag/s: tags, -. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream

Processed (with 1 errors): your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 373658 tags -patch Unknown tag/s: tags, -patch. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 373658 - patch Bug#373658: pyblosxom: minimize number of items on front space to stop planet-spamming Tags were: patch fixed-upstream upstream Tags removed: patch kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#373658: pyblosxom: minimize number of items on front space to stop planet-spamming

Removed the 'patch' tag (after several attempts) as this patch has been included upstream and so no longer needs to be considered for inclusion in the packaging. -- Daniel Watkins (Odd_Bloke) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Processing of secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4_i386.changes

secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4.dsc secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4.diff.gz secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4.diff.gz secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4.dsc to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4.dsc secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4_all.deb to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-4_all.deb Override entries for your package:

Bug#489658: marked as done (secpanel: bashism in /bin/sh script)

Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:17:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#489658: fixed in secpanel 0.41+0.4.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #489658, regarding secpanel: bashism in /bin/sh script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processing of secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5_i386.changes

secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5.dsc secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5.diff.gz secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5.diff.gz to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5.diff.gz secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5.dsc to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5.dsc secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5_all.deb to pool/main/s/secpanel/secpanel_0.41+0.4.2-5_all.deb Override entries for your package:

RFS: gnochm (updated package, QA upload)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.11-2 (QA Upload) of package gnochm. It builds these binary packages: gnochm - CHM file viewer for GNOME The upload would fix these bugs: 485300 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

Re: RFS: gnochm (updated package, QA upload)

OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du samedi 26 juillet 2008, vers 15:34, Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait : Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.11-2 (QA Upload) of package gnochm. Uploaded. Thanks. You might want to fix this in a future upload: E:

Re: RFS: gnochm (updated package, QA upload)

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 16:14, Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OoO En ce début d'après-midi ensoleillé du samedi 26 juillet 2008, vers 15:34, Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait : Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.11-2 (QA Upload) of package gnochm.

RFS: cmatrix (updated package, QA upload)

Dear mentors/QA Team, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2a-3 (QA upload) of package cmatrix. It builds these binary packages: cmatrix- simulates the display from The Matrix cmatrix-xfont - X11 font for cmatrix The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix

Re: RFS: gnochm (updated package, QA upload)

OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du samedi 26 juillet 2008, vers 16:17, Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait : With CDBS, I think that you just need to depend on autotools-dev. Ah, thanks! I read in the build log that CDBS automatically replace them with the ones in /usr/share/misc/ so I

Re: RFS: gnochm (updated package, QA upload)

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 16:58, Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du samedi 26 juillet 2008, vers 16:17, Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] disait : With CDBS, I think that you just need to depend on autotools-dev. Ah, thanks! I read in the build log that

RFS: audio-cd (updated package, QA upload, RC bugfix)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.05-7 (QA Upload) of package audio-cd. It builds these binary packages: libaudio-cd-perl - library to handle CDDB and low-level cd io calls The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 486073 The

[DONE] Re: RFS: cmatrix (updated package, QA upload)

Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (26/07/2008): I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2a-3 (QA upload) of package cmatrix. Uploaded, thanks. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [DONE] Re: RFS: cmatrix (updated package, QA upload)

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 17:56, Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] (26/07/2008): I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2a-3 (QA upload) of package cmatrix. Uploaded, thanks. Thanks! -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu) My website:

Re: RFS: audio-cd (updated package, QA upload, RC bugfix)

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 05:50:33PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.05-7 (QA Upload) of package audio-cd. It builds these binary packages: libaudio-cd-perl - library to handle CDDB and low-level cd io calls The package appears to be lintian clean.

adopting maxima

The maxima package has an unacknowledged RC bug from early April, and an unacknowledged NMU from January. I have some (ever slimmer) hope of better version of maxima in Lenny, and I would be willing to adopt the package to make that happen. I would be happy to turn the package back over to Camm

Re: RFS: audio-cd (updated package, QA upload, RC bugfix)

On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:49:26 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Maybe someone in the Pkg-Perl group has an interest in adopting this into the group instead? Sounds like a good idea. I'll take a closer look at the package tomorrow.

I want to help

To Whom It May Concern, I would like to help..in any way you need it Fix orphaned packages, Fix orphaned packages to the maintainers I am also talking to developer to become a developer..I have been coding for 11 years and scripting making web pages and lots of other items.. I was a developer for