Re: Bug#507189: asterisk: Depends on libc-client2007b which is not in unstable

2008-11-30 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 11:06:37AM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote: On Saturday 29 November 2008 10:28:44 Ben Hutchings wrote: libc-client2007b has been replaced by libc-client2007d in unstable. Thanks Ben. As you state this only effects sid, not lenny

Bug#254208: Still valid!

2008-11-30 Thread Eric Valette
Just checked today. I will no more test : I purged the system from this packages given the time without fix. Any gparted looks nicer. Why not orphan this package? -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#507288: mails to $pkg@p.d.o should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 29/11/08 at 20:27 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: package: package.qa.debian.org severity: wishlist Hi, currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address listed in maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS. IMO they also should be send to the addresses in

Bug#507288: mails to $pkg@p.d.o should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 30/11/08 at 10:49 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 29/11/08 at 20:27 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: package: package.qa.debian.org severity: wishlist Hi, currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address

Bug#507288: mails to $pkg@p.d.o should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 29/11/08 at 20:27 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: package: package.qa.debian.org severity: wishlist Hi, currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address listed in maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS.

Bug#507288: mails to $pkg@p.d.o should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-30 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Sunday 30 November 2008 10:49, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Holger your request is not really acceptable in the current situation but I also think that Uploaders/Maintainers should be auto-subscribed and that we should simplify the situation by having all services mail directly the PTS. And

Bug#507288: mails to $pkg@p.d.o should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-30 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 08:27:19PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address listed in Just to be sure: did you really mean [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? They are two different things. AFAICT the latter is handled by the

Bug#507288: mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-30 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address listed in maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS. IMO they also should be send to the addresses in Uploaders:.

Bug#507288: mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Hutchings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 13:50 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: currently, mails send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are only send to the address listed in maintainers and to those subscribed to the PTS. IMO they also should be

Bug#507288: mails to $pkg@p.d.o should also be send to Uploaders:

2008-11-30 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Holger Levsen wrote: On Sunday 30 November 2008 10:49, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Holger your request is not really acceptable in the current situation but I also think that Uploaders/Maintainers should be auto-subscribed and that we should simplify the situation by