Package: masqmail
Version: 0.2.21-6
Tags: l10n patch
Severity: wishlist
The updated Vietnamese translation for the debconf file: masqmail
completely reviewed, translated and submitted by:
Clytie Siddall
Vietnamese Free-Software Translation Team
softbeep_0.3-19_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
softbeep_0.3-19.dsc
softbeep_0.3-19.diff.gz
softbeep_0.3-19_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Accepted:
softbeep_0.3-19.diff.gz
to pool/main/s/softbeep/softbeep_0.3-19.diff.gz
softbeep_0.3-19.dsc
to pool/main/s/softbeep/softbeep_0.3-19.dsc
softbeep_0.3-19_amd64.deb
to pool/main/s/softbeep/softbeep_0.3-19_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
softbeep_0.3-19.dsc - source
Package: nedit
Version: 1:5.5-3
Severity: minor
Whenever I paste into nedit, the following is dumped to the shell.
Interestingly enough, the paste is successful.
Please let me know if I can provide any other information. From what
I can tell, this is distinct from the other copy and paste
Loïc Minier wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote:
it is also with ideas like this that i regret that our policy process
won't allow for a top-down flow of recommendations. imho this would be a
nice use for it, once consensus was be reached that this is a good idea.
The good
Raphael Geissert wrote:
[...]
Comments? suggestions? complains? volunteers to run wnpp-maintenance?
anything?
ping
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Raphael Geissert atomo64+deb...@gmail.com (28/01/2009):
So, what exactly should be checked? and what's the status of this
proposal?
Dunno for others, but I for one am busy processing NMs and fixing RC
bugs, I don't think any immediate action is needed at this point.
(But moving on would be
7 matches
Mail list logo
