Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 540969 python-wxgtk2.8 2.8.7.1-2
Bug #540969 [wammu] wammu: Symbol not defined in file libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so
Bug reassigned from package 'wammu' to 'python-wxgtk2.8'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions wammu/0.30.1-2.
Bug #540969
Richtig abnehmen muesste heut zutage problem1os
sein und weiterhin sch0n Spass machen.
Testen sie djese aktuelle Herangehensweise und erfahren Sie, wie kinder
leicht es sein kann neun K-i-l-o in nur einem Monat abzunehmen.
Hier erfaahren Sie Sie jede Information, um einfach viel abzunehmen
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 419431 libvigraimpex
Bug #419431 [libvigraimpex2] libvigraimpex2: New upstream release
Bug reassigned from package 'libvigraimpex2' to 'libvigraimpex'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions libvigraimpex/1.4.0-1.
forcemerge 540242
Found this patch in Launchpad forum. Sorry, can't test this with Debian,
but worked with Ubuntu Jaunty.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/skencil/+bug/361636/comments/4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
e2tools_0.0.16-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
e2tools_0.0.16-5.dsc
e2tools_0.0.16-5.diff.gz
e2tools_0.0.16-5_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
FYI: The status of the pysnmp-se source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 3.5.2-4
Current version: 3.5.2-5
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Accepted:
e2tools_0.0.16-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/e/e2tools/e2tools_0.0.16-5.diff.gz
e2tools_0.0.16-5.dsc
to pool/main/e/e2tools/e2tools_0.0.16-5.dsc
e2tools_0.0.16-5_i386.deb
to pool/main/e/e2tools/e2tools_0.0.16-5_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
e2tools_0.0.16-5.dsc - source
Schl-ank werden solllte heut zutage unkompliziert
sein und genau so schon Spass machen.
Probieren sie djese nagelneue Schlankheitsmethode und erfahren Sie, wie
problem-los es jetzt sein kann 11 K-i-l-o in nur einem Monat ab-zunehmen.
Hier er-fahren Sie Sie alles, um leicht duenner zu werden
Your message dated Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:24:12 +0100
with message-id 1250022252.605862.7738.nullmai...@kmos.homeip.net
and subject line Package f-prot-installer has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #514325,
regarding f-prot-installer: check-updates script won't work anymore
Package: sun-java5-plugin
Version: 1.5.0-20-1
Severity: minor
When I purged, I got lots of messages like
update-alternatives: warning: alternative
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun/bin/HtmlConverter (part of link group
HtmlConverter) doesn't exist. Removing from list of alternatives.
I think
Package: sun-java6-plugin
Version: 6-15-1
Severity: wishlist
This is definitely a user error, but since it frustrated me, I thought
you could mention it in the documentation (eg README.Debian). If in
your iceweasel Edit/Preferences, under Content, you have Enable Java
unchecked, the java plug-in
Hi,
I had some discussion with Christoph Haas and he was wondering how
his nice service from screenshots.debian.net might become available
at packages.debian.org. I have no idea who maintains the code but
perhaps somebody might enlighten me (or Christoph) who can implement
a three lines patch
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
alexan...@schmehl.info wrote:
Anyone interested in co maintaining that? Upstream is non existent,
there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority
standard. Doesn't sound like a package someone should adopt all alone.
Hi all,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:48, Sandro Tosimo...@debian.org wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The current maintainer of at, Ryan Murray rmur...@debian.org,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info (11/08/2009):
Anyone interested in co maintaining that? Upstream is non existent,
there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority
standard. Doesn't sound like a package someone should adopt all alone.
If time permits, yes.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 511303 521048 540863
Bug#511303: ddpo: invalid link built for multiple package versions in NEW
Bug#521048: qa.debian.org: multiple version of packages in NEW handled
incorrectly
Bug#540863: ddpo: multiple versions in NEW break links
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
please take a look at [1], specifically the dbus row.
The website displays incorrect information, like
a dbus_1.0.2-1+etch3 version in NEW for testing and unstable, or
a dbus_1.2.1-5+lenny1 for p-u-new in Stable.
Nedless to say, that there is no
tag 541081 + patch
thanks
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:29:32PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
please take a look at [1], specifically the dbus row.
The website displays incorrect information, like
a dbus_1.0.2-1+etch3 version in NEW for testing and unstable, or
a dbus_1.2.1-5+lenny1 for p-u-new in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 541081 + patch
Bug #541081 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org displays non-existing versions of dbus
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 17:29 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
please take a look at [1], specifically the dbus row.
The website displays incorrect information, like
a dbus_1.0.2-1+etch3 version in NEW for testing and unstable, or
a dbus_1.2.1-5+lenny1 for p-u-new in Stable.
Nedless to say, that
20 matches
Mail list logo
