Re: How to re-upload a removed package?

2009-12-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:52 AM, Alejandro Rios wrote: > 1. Should I upload it to unstable or to proposed-updates? That depends on your intention. At the minimum, the security issue should be fixed in oldstable even though security support for it expires in February. For that you need to follow

Re: How to re-upload a removed package?

2009-12-15 Thread Alejandro Rios
Hello Holger OK, that's the same Anibal Monsalve told me, but when I was about to do it, two questions came up: 1. Should I upload it to unstable or to proposed-updates? 2. If uploading to unstable, should I make other changes different from those that are related to the security bugs (i.e. for

Re: How long does debtag information need to propagate to UDD

2009-12-15 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > So my question is: How to track the path the information on the public > DebTags interface to UDD?  I might try and read the code of the debtags > importer but my hope is somebody is able to give a quick answer and has > an idea who is real

How long does debtag information need to propagate to UDD

2009-12-15 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, as you might know I use UDD to display package information for Debian Pure Blends. I tried to get a reasonable tool to set DebTags for a set of packages which are used in a certain workfield (so called task). This is implemented by providing a yellow button for not yet tagged on pages like th

Bug#561228: VCS-CVS are converted to bogus hyperlinks

2009-12-15 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Lines of the form │Vcs-CVS: :ext:_anon...@anoncvs.mirbsd.org:/cvs contrib/hosted/tg/deb/makefs are converted to bogus hyperlinks of the form │http://packages.qa.debian.org/libb/:ext:_anoncvs%40anoncvs.mirbsd.org:/cvs%20contrib/hosted/tg/deb/libbsd-arc4rand

Re: How to re-upload a removed package?

2009-12-15 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Alejandro, On Montag, 14. Dezember 2009, Alejandro Rios wrote: > But I'm not sure of what to do with this package anymore, specially after > it was already removed from unstable and testing, but not from (old)stable, > so some advice on this would be appreciated. Just bring the package back in

Re: Bug#496490: Please investigate removal of adolc

2009-12-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Barak A. Pearlmutter (15/12/2009): > > even though Neil Williams tried to give him a hand. > > He did? I'd be happy to have a co-maintainer. He did: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496490#8 Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature