Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#grepmail (5.3033-5) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * debian/patches/midnight.patch: Added, thanks to Manuel Prinz
#(Closes: #559588)
# * debian/patches/fix_nonexistent_mailbox_test.patch: Fix FTBFS with
#libmail-mbox-messageparser-perl
grepmail_5.3033-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grepmail_5.3033-5.dsc
grepmail_5.3033-5.debian.tar.gz
grepmail_5.3033-5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
grepmail_5.3033-5.debian.tar.gz
to main/g/grepmail/grepmail_5.3033-5.debian.tar.gz
grepmail_5.3033-5.dsc
to main/g/grepmail/grepmail_5.3033-5.dsc
grepmail_5.3033-5_all.deb
to main/g/grepmail/grepmail_5.3033-5_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
grepmail_5.3033-5.dsc -
Your message dated Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:17:08 +
with message-id e1o76cs-0005ob...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#559588: fixed in grepmail 5.3033-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #559588,
regarding grepmail: Complains about invalid config variable 'todayismidnight'
to be marked as done.
Package: fig2sty
Version: 1:0.1-12
Severity: minor
POD of Xfig.pm writes in the synopsys:
# Parse a Fig file
$fig-parsefile($figname);
die Can't read file $figname if ($fig-{'object'} 0);
However $fig-{'object'} is numeric (i.e. -1) in case of error only.
Otherwise it may be one of
FYI: The status of the knoda source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.8.3-3
Current version: 0.8.3-4
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
gob2_2.0.16-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gob2_2.0.16-4.dsc
gob2_2.0.16-4.debian.tar.gz
gob2_2.0.16-4_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
gob2_2.0.16-4.debian.tar.gz
to main/g/gob2/gob2_2.0.16-4.debian.tar.gz
gob2_2.0.16-4.dsc
to main/g/gob2/gob2_2.0.16-4.dsc
gob2_2.0.16-4_amd64.deb
to main/g/gob2/gob2_2.0.16-4_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
gob2_2.0.16-4.dsc - source devel
gob2_2.0.16-4_amd64.deb
Your message dated Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:18:42 +
with message-id e1o7gwg-0005qv...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#578004: fixed in spline 1.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #578004,
regarding aspline includes duplicate points in output
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 577377 pending
Bug #577377 [src:xdx] xdx: FTBFS: gui.c:844: undefined reference to
`GTK_WIDGET_HAS_FOCUS'
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 577377 - pending
Bug #577377 [src:xdx] xdx: FTBFS: gui.c:844: undefined reference to
`GTK_WIDGET_HAS_FOCUS'
Removed tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 08:11:06PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
From the changelog:
* Orphan package.
Right, but orphaned packages are _not_ set to this discussion ML.
Thanks for your helpful response!
Even running lintian on the package you uploaded points you to the right
Mark Brown broo...@sirena.org.uk (28/04/2010):
I'm orphaning the package. What part of that makes you think I'm
going to be interested in fixing random lintian warnings?
Random lintian warnings (and errors) like the ones you're generating
by orphaning the package in an improper manner? If
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:01:22PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Mark Brown broo...@sirena.org.uk (28/04/2010):
I'm orphaning the package. What part of that makes you think I'm
going to be interested in fixing random lintian warnings?
Random lintian warnings (and errors) like the ones
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:29:20AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 12:01:22PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Mark Brown broo...@sirena.org.uk (28/04/2010):
I'm orphaning the package. What part of that makes you think I'm
going to be interested in fixing random lintian
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
patch-tracker.debian.org is a great tool to see quickly which patches
are applied to some package. If would be very nice to add link to
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/source_package
in the links box.
Index:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 03:10:34PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:29:20AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
*sigh* Lintian just isn't the right tool for this job, the sort of
random things that lintian identifies just aren't interesting for an
upload like this.
An upload
Mark Brown wrote:
Look, I'm not saying that there's no problem with the upload here. What
I'm saying is that an e-mail such as that which was sent originally sent
tended rather to the hostile and appears to have unrealistic expectation
as to the sort of work that a maintainer is going to do
18 matches
Mail list logo
