On 2016-05-11 11:18:53, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:47:58PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > > - "Binary Package: libprotobuf-lite9v5: Package is optional and has a
> > > Conflicts on libprotobuf-lite9 which is optional"; the problem is that
> > > it libprotobuf-lite9v5 not only
On 2016-05-11 12:47:58, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Iustin Pop , 2016-05-09, 22:29:
> > I'm looking at
> > https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=protobuf, and
> > both issues I see listed seem false positives:
> >
> > - "Package has a Depends on python:any (>= 2.7.5-5~) which cannot b
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 check-all-the-things devscripts
Bug #824912 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.d.o: add an API for action items
Added indication that 824912 affects check-all-the-things and devscripts
--
824912: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824912
Debian B
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Control: affects -1 check-all-the-things devscripts
X-Debbugs-CC: check-all-the-thi...@packages.debian.org,
devscri...@packages.debian.org
User: check-all-the-thi...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: new-check
It would be nice to have an API for tracker.
Hello,
Are there any updates on this? I was just about to report this same
issue and found the ticket existing already. It looks like a patch was
made and there are no objections to the idea. This would make it much
easier to scan for backports that need updating.
Many thanks for your work on DDPO
5 matches
Mail list logo
