Re: debian/upstream/metadata: next steps

2020-08-14 Thread Charles Plessy
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:37 PM Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > Would it make sense to standardize the current proposal as DEP-12, perhaps > > with > > a limited set of uncontroversial and widely used fields? Le Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:04:35AM +, Paul Wise a écrit : > > I wonder if storing

Re: debian/upstream/metadata: next steps

2020-08-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 4:37 PM Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > Would it make sense to standardize the current proposal as DEP-12, perhaps > with > a limited set of uncontroversial and widely used fields? I wonder if storing metadata (including Homepage, debian/watch, debian/upstream/*) about the

debian/upstream/metadata: next steps

2020-08-14 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Hi Charles, Andreas, DEP-12 appears to have been stalled for a while in the draft phase; I'd be keen to see if it can be moved forward - and would really appreciate any suggestions on how to help do so. Adoption It looks like there are already close to 5000 debian/upstream/metadata

Re: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty

2020-08-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lucas, On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 11:24:42PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Well, why don't you look at the code? No idea whether it is sensible to answer rhetorical questions. Since you asked despite you probably know that I'm doing even more than usual for Debian Med since COVID-19 here