Bug#1042409: python3-distorm3,libdistorm3-3: undeclared file conflict /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdistorm3.so.3

Hi Helmut, > Package: python3-distorm3,libdistorm3-3 > Version: 3.5.2b-1 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > both libdistorm3-3 and python3-distorm3 contain > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdistorm3.so.3. When coinstalling these > packages, an unpack error results. I suspect that the python one >

Bug#1033190: libvisual-plugins: [INTL:de] Updated German Translation

> please find attached the newest German translation. Hi Chris, Your translation, sent in 2023-03-19 is for 0.4.0+dfsg1-17 revision. I uploaded a new upstream version (0.4.1) to experimental in 2023-03-12 and the version 0.4.2, also to experimental, today (some minutes ago). Could you check the

Bug#1021448: apt-venv: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr

Package: apt-venv Version: 1.0.0-4 Severity: serious Dear maintainer, A recent upload of apt-venv introduced CI tests that fail over some architectures. See below an example for arm64. [...] Ign:37 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/multiverse arm64 Packages Err:19

Bug#1021445: apt-venv: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr

Package: apt-venv Version: 1.0.0-4 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: Braulio Henrique Marques Souto Dear maintainer, A recent upload of apt-venv introduced CI tests that fail over some architectures. See below an example for arm64. [...] Ign:37 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

Bug#1021441: apt-venv: autopkgtest regression: output on stderr

Package: apt-venv Version: 1.0.0-4 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: Braulio Henrique Marques Souto Dear maintainer, A recent upload of apt-venv introduced CI tests that fail over some architectures. See below an example for arm64. [...] Ign:37 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

Bug#1016557: xfonts-cronyx: Non-DFSG file

Source: xfonts-cronyx Version: 2.3.8 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.2.1 X-Debbugs-Cc: eribe...@debian.org The license for tryfont/ISO8859-5 says: --- Copyright (c) 1991-1995 Unicode, Inc. All Rights reserved. This file is provided as-is by Unicode, Inc. (The

Bug#437301: ldap2dns: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1)

Em sex., 15 de jul. de 2022 às 13:10, Eriberto Mota escreveu: > > The bug #940607 provides a solution for this issue. However, I noticed that migrating debian/rules to dh sequence (debian/rules in reduced format) also will fix this bug. Eriberto

Bug#437301: ldap2dns: not handling nostrip build option (policy 10.1)

Control: tags 437301 patch The bug #940607 provides a solution for this issue. Regards, Eriberto

Bug#1006198: docbook: Packaging license incompatible with the upstream

Package: docbook Version: 4.5-9 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: Mark W. Eichin , Adam Di Carlo , J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) , Yann Dirson , Steve Langasek , Daniel Leidert (dale) , Jakub Wilk , Mathieu Malaterre , Helmut Grohne The current packaging license (GPL-2+) is incompatible with upstream

Bug#1004891: delta: Packaging licensing incompatible with the upstream

Package: delta Version: 2006.08.03-9 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: jw...@debian.org, b...@brad-smith.co.uk The current packaging licensing (GPL-3+) is incompatible with upstream licensing (BSD-3-Clause). It is a hampering condition to submit patches from Debian to the upstream. I would like

Bug#984434: id3ren: Wrong homepage

> I think that the homepage is now: > https://github.com/sebcode/id3ren This seems like a fork for a specific change only, not a new homepage. Regards, Eriberto

Re: upload_history not updated (Was: UDD mirror not up to date)

Hi guys, Today I noticed an issue in my report[1] at the end of the first section (called "Sources in Debian Sid including orphan, by upload dates"). Some packages don't have an upload date. This is very common for packages uploaded a few hours ago. However, I can see some packages not updated

Bug#992461: qa.debian.org: [udd] upload_date and date stalled

Em qui., 19 de ago. de 2021 às 01:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg escreveu: > > On 8/18/21 11:40 PM, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: > > The last registered date in 'upload_date' from 'bapase' is 2021-08-13. In my > > tests I can see the same problem in 'date' from 'upload_history'

Bug#992461: qa.debian.org: [udd] upload_date and date stalled

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: nil...@debian.org Dear UDD admin, The last registered date in 'upload_date' from 'bapase' is 2021-08-13. In my tests I can see the same problem in 'date' from 'upload_history'. Can you check, please? Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto

Bug#257095: MAXPATHLEN

Hi Edward, Where is the version 2.5.1? Regards, Eriberto

Bug#966649: Unfortunately there are several Uploads missing (Was: upload_history is back)

Em qua., 26 de ago. de 2020 às 06:45, Andreas Tille escreveu: > > Control: reopen -1 > > Hi Asheesh, > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:52:56PM -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > > Test yourself with e.g. this command (which queries the public UDD mirror, > > but you can use the real UDD if you can

Bug#966649: [UDD] Upload_history table is currently empty

Hi guys, I would like to say this bug revives #922546. I hope that in the short-term a solution to it will be found. Thanks for all efforts to fix it. Regards, Eriberto

Bug#962065: rdist: Non-free license

Package: rdist Version: 6.1.5 Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.1 The current version of rdist in Debian says in Copyright file and in every headers: /* * Copyright (c) 1992-1998 Michael A. Cooper. * This software may be freely used and distributed provided it is not *

Bug#956927: wav2cdr: Regression in arm64 CI: wav2cdr.c:281: main: Assertion `sizeof(UINT32) == 4' failed.

Package: wav2cdr Version: 2.3.4-3 Severity: important The new and first CI test[1] for wav2cdr fails in arm64[2]. Consequently, the revision 2.3.4-3 will not migrate to testing. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wav2cdr/-/blob/debian/master/debian/tests/control [2]

Bug#956140: xtail: wrong licensing for packaging

) but the packaging license was also changed, now for GPL-2+[3] without any asking for permission for previous holders (Roderick Schertler and Joao Eriberto Mota Filho). Other consideration is that GPL-2+ is incompatible with the upstream licensing (BSD and public domain). [3] https://salsa.debian.org/debian

Bug#956010: zpb-ttf: Packaging licensing should be changed

Source: zpb-ttf Severity: normal The zpb-ttf is under BSD-2-Clause but the packaging is under GPL-2+ license. GPL-2 in packaging is incompatible with the upstream development if needed send patches to the author. I am opening this bug with a CC to previous maintainer in Debian to ask if someone

Bug#878231: Upstream Seems Alive

Thanks a lot for your help. The first link is down but the last URL is alive. Regards, Eriberto

Bug#941391: rdate: New upstream release and homepage

Package: rdate Severity: wishlist Dear maintainer, The OpenRdate Project has a new homepage[1] and version (1.10). Please, consider packaging it. [1] https://github.com/resurrecting-open-source-projects/openrdate Thanks! Regards, Eriberto

Bug#523513: rdate: should not set time if network delay is too big

Control: fixed 523513 upstream/1.10 Dear maintainer, The suggested patch was applied in 1.10 version[1]. [1] https://github.com/resurrecting-open-source-projects/openrdate/commit/45f494e9edcd2c78ea8bbe62e5f3daeff67c457e Please, consider closing this bug in next Debian revision. Regards,

Bug#934046: mrename: Homepage field arrives to Linkedin

Package: mrename Version: 1.2-14 Severity: normal The Homepage field points to http://alfalinux.sourceforge.net/mrename.php3. This URL redirects to a Linkedin personal page. Eriberto

Bug#932796: Non-DFSG license in dyndns.pl file

Package: dyndns Version: 2016.1021-3 Severity: serious Tags: upstream When searching for a license inside dyndns.pl, I found the information shown below: #!/usr/bin/perl # # Copyright # # Copyright (C) 1999-2016 Jari Aalto # # License # # This program is free

Bug#829985: imagination: Uses deprecated gnome-common macros/variables

Hi all, For this specific package, I found: autogen.sh:if [ -n "$GNOME2_DIR" ]; then autogen.sh: ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I $GNOME2_DIR/share/aclocal $ACLOCAL_FLAGS" autogen.sh: LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$GNOME2_DIR/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" autogen.sh: PATH="$GNOME2_DIR/bin:$PATH" All issues are inside

Bug#922556: gimp-texturize: New upstream homepage

Package: gimp-texturize Version: 2.1-5 Severity: normal There is a new upstream homepage here[1]. [1] https://lmanul.github.io/gimp-texturize/index.html Regards, Eriberto

Bug#922546: qa.debian.org: [udd] upload_history table not updating

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Hi all, When using the following command against official and public UDD servers, the dates are missing: SELECT source, upload_date::date FROM bapase ORDER BY upload_date DESC limit 30; The last registered date is 2019-01-16. It can be confirmed

Bug#919850: python3-link-grammar: broken symlink: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/linkgrammar/_clinkgrammar.so -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1

Hi, After dh_install: python3-link-grammar └── usr └── lib └── python3.7 └── site-packages ├── linkgrammar │ ├── clinkgrammar.py │ ├── _clinkgrammar.so -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1 │ ├── _clinkgrammar.so.5

Bug#842882: jp2a 1.0.7 has been removed from experimental

Thanks Adrian! I will keep this bug opened to alert all future packagers, considering the upstream did some commits but don't released a new version. So, the current jp2a version is 1.0.7. Regards, Eriberto

Bug#877542: mmorph FTBFS on most architectures: test1 failed

2017-10-02 13:48 GMT-03:00 Adrian Bunk : > Source: mmorph > Version: 2.3.4.2-13 > Severity: serious > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=mmorph=sid > > ... > make -j4 test VERBOSE=1 > make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' > LC_CTYPE=C ./mmorph -n -m data/example -l

Bug#805370: mpage licensing

On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 21:13:47 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote: > Ping... > > As a QA maintained package which is not going into the upcoming release > with a license issue open for 1.5 years, shouldn't this package be > removed from Debian? > > Paul > Hi Paul, The upstream released a

Bug#845324: FTBFS: /bin/sh: 1: emacs: not found

Package: bhl Version: 1.7.3-3 Severity: serious Tags: newcomer Justification: fails to build from source Hi, The package is 'all' and always was sent already built. It needs emacs to build from source. Please, add 'emacs' as build dependency. Regards, Eriberto

Bug#340734: bhl: there is a new version available

Hi, Now, there is the 1.9 version available. The current upstream homepage is http://www.nongnu.org/bhl/ Regards, Eriberto

Bug#828537: samdump2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Control: tags 828537 patch Hi, I believe that the attached patch will solve the issue. Regards, Eriberto Description: fix a FTBFS, making the source code compatible with new OpenSSL 1.1.0. (Closes: #828537) Author: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eribe...@debian.org> Last-Update

Bug#841831: people.debian.org: provide psql command for UDD users

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Please, provide psql command to allow users insert UDD data in their pages. Currently, I have some UDD reports[1] and I need to process my queries in my personal website and, after this, pull from people.debian.org/~eriberto/ [1]

Bug#840296: [udd] upload_history table has stopped updating

Control: severity 840296 important > From: Chris Lamb > (#debian-qa) > > 11:04 < mapreri> lucas: upload_history seems to have stopped a month ago :( > > > > https://paste.debian.net/hidden/8cef723c/ > > I use this table a fair amount in various scripts, so

Bug in UDD?

Hi, I have a little doubt about UDD: why the bapase.upload_date is not updated or why can take a long time to be updated? Is it a bug? As an example, the following query will have the upoad_date empty. The last register is 2016-09-04. SELECT source, upload_date::date FROM bapase ORDER BY

Bug#840573: unicon: DFSG-incompatible license

Hi, 2016-10-13 6:58 GMT-03:00 Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es>: > On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote: > >> Source: unicon >> Severity: serious >> Tags: upstream >> Justification: Policy 2.2.1 >> [...] >> >> There is a restr

Bug#840573: unicon: DFSG-incompatible license

Source: unicon Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Dear Maintainer, The file unicon/ImmModules/cxterm/utils/HZtable.h has the following license: Copyright 1994,1995 by Yongguang Zhang. All Rights Reserved Permission to retain, use, modify, copy, and distribute CXTERM

Bug#824470: DDPO: add last-upload and Standards-Version columns

Hi, I created a report[1] based in UDD that provides the requested information. [1] https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/help_a_package.html Regards, Eriberto

Bug#805370: mpage licensing

Hi, I am a Debian community member. In my last revision over the mpage packaged in Debian[1], I detected that the licensing used[2] does not say explicitely about rights to modify the source code. It can break the liberty to make changes in source code. This issue was debated here[3] and

Bug#805370: Any answer from mpage upstream regarding the copyright situation?

Hi Adrian, I think that I forgot this issue. I will try contact the upstream. Thanks for your poke. Regards, Eriberto 2016-09-18 5:23 GMT-03:00 Adrian Bunk : > Hi Eriberto, > > in [1] you wrote that you will contact mpage upstream regarding the > copyright situation. > > Did

Bug#809830: Please, allow licensing change (was: wtop: dubious packaging license change)

Thanks Mauro! Regards, Eriberto 2016-08-30 20:34 GMT-03:00 Mauro : > Hi Eriberto, > > I'm no longer a Debian Developer (that's why you might received a > bounced-mail) so, I'm not sure about taking a position in this matter. > FWIW, I think it's a positive change so for

Bug#809830: Fwd: Please, allow licensing change (was: wtop: dubious packaging license change)

Hi Mauro, Forwarding a message about licensing. Regards, Eriberto -- Forwarded message -- From: Eriberto Mota <eribe...@debian.org> Date: 2016-08-28 10:44 GMT-03:00 Subject: Re: Please, allow licensing change (was: wtop: dubious packaging license change) T

Bug#809830: Please, allow licensing change (was: wtop: dubious packaging license change)

Hi Mauro, Luca and Jakub, I am writing this message to try solve the #809830 bug. The wtop (orphan and in experimental), originally, uses BSD-3-Clause license. The packaging uses GPL (GPL-3, I can supose, considering that it isn't clear in debian/copyright). I would like to change the packaging

Bug#824470: DDPO: add last-upload and Standards-Version columns

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Please, add last-upload and Standards-Version columns. These columns will provide an easiest mode to find and help very old packages, discover visually MIA maintainers, predict future problems, etc. For Standards-Version my suggestion

Bug#813352: iroffer: FTBFS when using -pie and -Werror=format-security

Package: iroffer Version: 1.4.b03 Severity: important Tags: upstream Dear Maintainer, The iroffer does not build when using the -pie and -Werror=format-security flags. To verify this issue, do the following changes in debian/rules file:

Bug#645161: gramofile: 'copyright' file upstream URL outdated

Hi, Thanks for your suggestions. I am doing a QA uploading that will close this bug. However, this file[1] shouldn't changed, because the webpage in 1.1 version was this[2]. [1] /usr/share/doc/gramofile/changelog.gz [2] http://cardit.et.tudelft.nl/~card06 Regards, Eriberto

Bug#805370: mpage: non-free license

Package: mpage Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The main license used by mpage says: * Permission is granted to anyone to make or distribute verbatim * copies of this document as received, in any medium, provided * that this copyright notice is

Bug#775292: qa.debian.org: popcon showing several wrong information for Ruby packages in experimental

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important Dear Maintainer, These NEW packages were accepted in 'experimental' recently: cewl (Jan 10, 2015) ruby-mime (Dec 29, 2014) ruby-mini-exiftool (Dec 29, 2014) ruby-spider (Dec 29, 2014) The facts: 1. The popcon for cewl, ruby-mini-exiftool and

Bug#761697: DDPO: showing package adopted by third-party as being mine

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I orphaned the package pacman4console in 2014-07-25. The package was adopted by Alexandre Dantas in 2014-08-12 and I was the sponsor. Currently, the package is shown in both DDPO[1][2]. I reviewed the package again and I can't see errors.

Bug#759027: DDPO: showing old BPO package version

reopen 759027 thanks Hi! Reopening this bug because I think the problem came back. I uploaded the lime-forensics_1.3~svn.r21-1~bpo70+1 on 2014-08-27 (05:00 UTC). Today, my DDPO is showing the old version yet. Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#759027: qa.debian.org: DDPO shows old BPO package version

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, In my QA page I can't see the versions of my BPO packages. An example is the 'core-network' package. DDPO shows the 4.6-5~bpo70+1 version, when PTS shows 4.7-1~bpo70+1 (uploaded to BPO on 2014-08-17). Thanks in advance. Regards,

Bug#759030: DDPO: showing a sponsored package as NEW and unstable/testing

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, My QA page is showing the package 'buildnotify' as NEW and testing at the same time. I uploaded this package to NEW (as sponsor) on 2014-08-03 and it was accepted in unstable on 2014-08-04. Thanks in advance. Regards, Eriberto -- To