On Sun, 27 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 06:21:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > targetfile = "%s/%s.0.txt" % (dir, info['timestamp'])
> > At least it'll fix the sorting order...
>
> Yes, but it will add the ".0" to all files. While not using it we will
> have
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 06:21:16PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> targetfile = "%s/%s.0.txt" % (dir, info['timestamp'])
> At least it'll fix the sorting order...
Yes, but it will add the ".0" to all files. While not using it we will
have the extra digit only when needed, which I hope are exceptio
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Note that this behaviour should be fixed. It happens that dak send several
> > Accepted mails during the same second for example when the package gets
> > out of NEW and when severa
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 02:17:19PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Note that this behaviour should be fixed. It happens that dak send several
> Accepted mails during the same second for example when the package gets
> out of NEW and when several upload happened while the package was sitting
> in NE
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Moreover, and that's the main point of this report, it seems that the
> > last time the clash happened was January 2006, no other clashes in 2007
> > nor 2008. Is it possible tha
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Moreover, and that's the main point of this report, it seems that the
> last time the clash happened was January 2006, no other clashes in 2007
> nor 2008. Is it possible that the issue has been solved elsewhere and
> the clash n
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> If so we can just run a script to check whether the affected files are
> duplicates or not, get rid of all the duplicates ... and hope nothing
> else remains in the bucket :-)
Just for fun I've actually searched for duplicated.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 08:48:05PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Just for fun I've actually searched for duplicated. Attached there's a
> list, 106 out of 386 "weird sorted" news dirs are duplicated, the
Ehm ... forgot attachment.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ..
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 12:39 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> There are more packages effected, the reason is that now the PTS cannot
> have multiple entries of exactly the same second, and that during
> conversion, rathern than deleting clashing entries, I left them for now
> pending looking a
The same issue seem to affect masqmail,
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/masqmail.html >.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 12:39 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> There are more packages effected, the reason is that now the PTS cannot
> have multiple entries of exactly the same second, and that during
> conversion, rathern than deleting clashing entries, I left them for now
> pending looking a
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 01:40:50AM +0100, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: minor
>
> Hi,
>
> I discovered that http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydns.html shows the
> acceptance of mydns 0.11.0-8 in unstable out of order on top of the list
> of latest news. Since it's the fir
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hi,
I discovered that http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mydns.html shows the
acceptance of mydns 0.11.0-8 in unstable out of order on top of the list
of latest news. Since it's the first line I got at a first glance the
impression that the newest uploaded pack
13 matches
Mail list logo
