Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages

2008-02-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:07:56AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: I'd also like to see the PTS using jeroen's buildd status page instead of igloo's buildd status page since it is more useful. URL please Anyhow the current ports link points to

Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages

2008-02-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 13:50 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: URL please Sorry, should have repeated the URLs from the original bug report: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/ http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=packagesuite=unstable Anyhow the current ports link

Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages

2008-02-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 07/02/2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: URL please Random examples: http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=ecj http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?packages=ecj notice the “for” column, the links to the build logs, the display of the failed builds, P-a-s entries (if

Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages

2008-02-07 Thread Riku Voipio
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:50:40PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:07:56AM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: I'd also like to see the PTS using jeroen's buildd status page instead of igloo's buildd status page since it is more useful. URL please Anyhow the current

Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages

2008-02-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:08:01PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: Sorry, should have repeated the URLs from the original bug report: Thanks to all who provided the links. Frankly I'd like to see it replace some of the official buildd interface, but getting the PTS/DDPO to use it for the More link is

Bug#443189: PTS: 443189: please use jeroen's buildd pages

2008-02-06 Thread Paul Wise
Package: qa.debian.org Followup-For: Bug # I'd also like to see the PTS using jeroen's buildd status page instead of igloo's buildd status page since it is more useful. Is there any reason not to make this change or anything holding it up? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise