Re: Bug#541013: O: at -- Delayed job execution and batch processing

2009-08-11 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (11/08/2009): > Anyone interested in co maintaining that? Upstream is non existent, > there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority > standard. Doesn't sound like a package someone should adopt all alone. If time permits, yes. Mraw, KiBi. signatur

Re: Bug#541013: O: at -- Delayed job execution and batch processing

2009-08-11 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi all, On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:48, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > The current maintainer of at, Ryan Murray , > is apparently not active anymore.  Therefore, I orphan this package now. > > Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this > packa

Re: Bug#541013: O: at -- Delayed job execution and batch processing

2009-08-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Anyone interested in co maintaining that?  Upstream is non existent, > there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority > standard.  Doesn't sound like a package someone should adopt all alone. It is worth noting

Re: Bug#541013: O: at -- Delayed job execution and batch processing

2009-08-11 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Sandro Tosi schrieb: > Package: at > Binary: at > Version: 3.1.10.2 > Priority: standard > Section: admin [..] Anyone interested in co maintaining that? Upstream is non existent, there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority standard. Doesn't sound like a package someone