Hello,
Sorry for the delay...
Filippo Giunchedi a écrit :
Hi,
TULIP uses qemu to run automatic upgrades on 'virtual' installations;
this way, you can test the dist-upgrade of several environments. The
cons is that it is quite slow.
There is more information about TULIP on:
http://www.edos
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:53:34AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > >
> > > I've been rebuilding the GNOME stack with a couple of interesting QA
> > > tests:
> > > - -Os in CFLAGS
> > > - -Wl,-O1 in LDFLAGS
> > > - -Wl,-z,defs in LDFLAGS
> > > - -j2 in MAKEFLAGS
> > > - use differents director
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 05:23:13PM +0100, François Déchelle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm in the edos project, and there are I think 2 set of tools which can
> be usefull:
> - dependencies management tools, probably anla, but I don't know the
> dependencies management tools enough in depth to giv
Filippo Giunchedi a écrit :
[opening a new thread, since it was the original idea]
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:59:59PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I'm more worried about how you choose the environment you want to
dist-upgrade. Various criteria that come to my mind (braindump):
- base system
* Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070303 06:50]:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 10:41 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Well, what I'm looking for is:
> >
> > [A] People with good ideas of tests that would improve Debian's
> > quality, or Free Software's quality in general
>
> One idea: double pack
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 10:41 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Well, what I'm looking for is:
>
> [A] People with good ideas of tests that would improve Debian's
> quality, or Free Software's quality in general
One idea: double package rebuilds, second rebuild in the same
non-cleaned chroot. The
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:59:59PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm more worried about how you choose the environment you want to
> dist-upgrade. Various criteria that come to my mind (braindump):
> - base system only (pro: easy to set up, cons: tests a too small set of
> package)
> - \fora
[opening a new thread, since it was the original idea]
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:59:59PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm more worried about how you choose the environment you want to
> dist-upgrade. Various criteria that come to my mind (braindump):
> - base system only (pro: easy to set u
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:27:54PM +0100, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> how about testing automatic dist-upgrades like stable->testing?
I love this idea: as a maintainer is quite a burden to take care of
this, a massive testing effort would help a lot of DDs out there!
> of course this is not trivia
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Well, what I'm looking for is:
>
> [A] People with good ideas of tests that would improve Debian's
> quality, or Free Software's quality in general
>
> [B] People willing to help with providing code for the tests, and
> pro
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 10:41 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Well, what I'm looking for is:
>
> [A] People with good ideas of tests that would improve Debian's
> quality, or Free Software's quality in general
>
> [B] People willing to help with providing code for the tests, and
> providing
On 27/02/07 at 10:53 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> (We had a small exchange via private email with Lucas and he suggested
> we continue the discussion on debian-qa@, hence full text included
> below.)
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 24/02/07 at 16:34
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Just one thought: Why not test "-Wl,--as-needed" too? It should greatly
> reduce the number of dependencies for most packages without the tedious
> and error-prone task to re-libtoolize the package for every new release.
--as-needed would also be a t
Just one thought: Why not test "-Wl,--as-needed" too? It should greatly
reduce the number of dependencies for most packages without the tedious
and error-prone task to re-libtoolize the package for every new release.
I'd also like to know how many percent of our packages which could be
re-libtooli
Hi there,
(We had a small exchange via private email with Lucas and he suggested
we continue the discussion on debian-qa@, hence full text included
below.)
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 24/02/07 at 16:34 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been r
15 matches
Mail list logo
