Small update on those packages:
On 2021/01/17 09:53 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:43:20PM +0100, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> > While discussing on #debian-qa how to handle those bugs on packages
> > without reachable maintainer, Mattia suggested to simply
Hi
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 09:53:04PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
gustavo panizzo
numad (U)
That's a DD: g...@debian.org - just ask forward the bug to him.
I assume my name end up here because I'm listed as Uploader in numad,
but above's email address is still valid and works
Hello,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:43:20PM +0100, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> While discussing on #debian-qa how to handle those bugs on packages
> without reachable maintainer, Mattia suggested to simply orphan those,
> without the need of going through the MIA process. Just to be sure of
> what
On 1/13/21 1:17 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:43:20PM +0100, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following Holger's no-change source-only uploads to have all binaries
>> built on buildd [1], a couple of RC bugs have been opened because
>> Maintainers email's are
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:43:20PM +0100, Baptiste Beauplat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following Holger's no-change source-only uploads to have all binaries
> built on buildd [1], a couple of RC bugs have been opened because
> Maintainers email's are unreachable.
>
> While discussing on #debian-qa how to
Hi,
Following Holger's no-change source-only uploads to have all binaries
built on buildd [1], a couple of RC bugs have been opened because
Maintainers email's are unreachable.
While discussing on #debian-qa how to handle those bugs on packages
without reachable maintainer, Mattia suggested to
6 matches
Mail list logo
