-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF
Anthony> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Anthony> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Anthony> Hello world,
Anthony> I'm experimenting with
Hi.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Anthony Towns writes:
> I'm experimenting with a script to work out whether packages are
> installable or not. I figured the world at large might be interested in
> some of the results.
Thank you for your nice work.
> The following packages are not installab
> > I'm experimenting with a script to work out whether packages are
> > installable or not. I figured the world at large might be interested in
> > some of the results.
Aj.. You do know that APT has included such a function for quite some time
now,
apt-cache unmet -i
will print out all package
On Thu, 07 Oct 1999, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> secure-su is also uninstallable.
As far as I can see, secure-su is no longer available in potato. It
is replaced by the login package (including /bin/su) which is now
linked with PAM and this behaves like the secure-su if you activate
the line
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 07:27:38PM +0200, Thomas Schoepf wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:29:34AM -0400, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> > secure-su is also uninstallable.
> >
> > Depends: login >=970502-1
> > Current: login 19990827-5
> >
> > Does anybody else think it's kind o
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:29:34AM -0400, Kurt D. Starsinic wrote:
> secure-su is also uninstallable.
>
> Depends: login >=970502-1
> Current: login 19990827-5
>
> Does anybody else think it's kind of nutty that 19990827-5 is less
> than 970502-1?
It's not less:
asterix:~$ d
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:13:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> I'm experimenting with a script to work out whether packages are
> installable or not. I figured the world at large might be interested in
> some of the results.
>
> The following packages are not installable (ie, t
Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:13:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> >
> > Depends: libgl1 ; which doesn't exist
>
> This exists in CVS. libGL.so.1 is what is used by the latest versions of
> GLX and Mesa. I think the problem was coming up with a sane way to make
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:13:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Packages with unknown dependencies:
>
> clanlib0-display-fbdev-dev
> clanlib0-display-ggi-dev
> clanlib0-display-glx
> clanlib0-display-glx-dev
> clanlib0-display-svgalib-dev
> clanlib0-display-x11-dev
>
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 10:13:51PM +1000 , Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> I'm experimenting with a script to work out whether packages are
> installable or not. I figured the world at large might be interested in
> some of the results.
>
> The following packages are not installable (ie,
10 matches
Mail list logo
